this post was submitted on 28 Apr 2026
72 points (98.6% liked)

Europe

11061 readers
593 users here now

News and information from Europe πŸ‡ͺπŸ‡Ί

(Current banner: La Mancha, Spain. Feel free to post submissions for banner images.)

Rules (2024-08-30)

  1. This is an English-language community. Comments should be in English. Posts can link to non-English news sources when providing a full-text translation in the post description. Automated translations are fine, as long as they don't overly distort the content.
  2. No links to misinformation or commercial advertising. When you post outdated/historic articles, add the year of publication to the post title. Infographics must include a source and a year of creation; if possible, also provide a link to the source.
  3. Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. Don't post direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments. Don't troll nor incite hatred. Don't look for novel argumentation strategies at Wikipedia's List of fallacies.
  4. No bigotry, sexism, racism, antisemitism, islamophobia, dehumanization of minorities, or glorification of National Socialism. We follow German law; don't question the statehood of Israel.
  5. Be the signal, not the noise: Strive to post insightful comments. Add "/s" when you're being sarcastic (and don't use it to break rule no. 3).
  6. If you link to paywalled information, please provide also a link to a freely available archived version. Alternatively, try to find a different source.
  7. Light-hearted content, memes, and posts about your European everyday belong in other communities.
  8. Don't evade bans. If we notice ban evasion, that will result in a permanent ban for all the accounts we can associate with you.
  9. No posts linking to speculative reporting about ongoing events with unclear backgrounds. Please wait at least 12 hours. (E.g., do not post breathless reporting on an ongoing terror attack.)
  10. Always provide context with posts: Don't post uncontextualized images or videos, and don't start discussions without giving some context first.

(This list may get expanded as necessary.)

Posts that link to the following sources will be removed

Unless they're the only sources, please also avoid The Sun, Daily Mail, any "thinktank" type organization, and non-Lemmy social media (incl. Substack). Don't link to Twitter directly, instead use xcancel.com. For Reddit, use old:reddit:com

(Lists may get expanded as necessary.)

Ban lengths, etc.

We will use some leeway to decide whether to remove a comment.

If need be, there are also bans: 3 days for lighter offenses, 7 or 14 days for bigger offenses, and permanent bans for people who don't show any willingness to participate productively. If we think the ban reason is obvious, we may not specifically write to you.

If you want to protest a removal or ban, feel free to write privately to the admin that applied the rule (check modlog first to find who was it.)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

"The major problem behind anonymity is toxicity," argues digital governance minister

all 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SorteKanin@feddit.dk 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Have these people actually ever compared the anonymous internet with the named internet? Facebook is flooded with bigots and idiots that readily spout racist and hateful words, with their full name in plain sight. Meanwhile, anonymous places like Reddit are far better moderated (yes, I know we hate on reddit here but it is much better moderated than Facebook). Same applies to most of the fediverse.

I suspect these people haven't actually used these anonymous places on the internet much. I guess I shouldn't be surprised.

[–] limonfiesta@lemmy.world 27 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Best case scenario is this provides the hard data showing how dangerous this is and it serves as a real deterrent against adoption elsewhere.

Worst case, is that it's so effective at chilling public discussion that it becomes a blueprint for everywhere.

[–] KatherinaReichelt@feddit.org 7 points 1 day ago (2 children)

And this is so problematic. First of all, there's really a chilling effect going on with putting your real identity to your online posts. I'm not sure if I would be posting on here if everybody could link my profile here to my real name. There is a reason why people are not discussing depression, drug use, or marital problems with their work colleagues or neighbors. And people really would not like if prospective employers could see everything they are writing online.

There's also a chilling effect on political debate. You really do not want your home address being available to violent Neo-Nazis, Hamas supporters, Covid-deniers and other idiots. That will lead to harassment and this will lead to people stopping discussing certain topics.

[–] natecox@programming.dev 3 points 1 day ago

Even for people who might use their real name, it's probably only because they belong to a class of people who don't need to worry about the vitriolic bullshit bigotry that so many others deal with on a regular basis.

I'm willing to accept that dropping anonymity might cool down some toxicity. But if the cost is removing a very necessary layer of protection for those who absolutely need it, it's too high a cost to pay.

[–] gian@lemmy.grys.it -1 points 1 day ago (2 children)

And this is so problematic. First of all, there’s really a chilling effect going on with putting your real identity to your online posts. I’m not sure if I would be posting on here if everybody could link my profile here to my real name. There is a reason why people are not discussing depression, drug use, or marital problems with their work colleagues or neighbors. And people really would not like if prospective employers could see everything they are writing online.

I think that the big problem is that more than putting your real identity to your post there should be a way to identify you in case it is needed, anonymity cannot be a free pass to commit any kind of crime.
Online you are not really anonymous anyway, your provider know where and when you go to a site, it would not be difficult to trace back to you if someone is willing to do it.

I don't know how this problem could be solved btw.

There’s also a chilling effect on political debate. You really do not want your home address being available to violent Neo-Nazis, Hamas supporters, Covid-deniers and other idiots. That will lead to harassment and this will lead to people stopping discussing certain topics.

Well, if anonymity is removed also the violent Neo-Nazis (or whatever) is exposed, maybe he would think twice before doing/saying something stupid knowing that nothing stop someone else to make him the victim of harassment or to be treated like an idiot or ignored at work (or any other real life situation) because people find his social accounts and simply decide to not interact with (if not totally boycott) him.
Yes, maybe not the first time, but in the end people like these will return where they belong, in their small circle of idiots.

[–] Ardyvee@europe.pub 2 points 1 day ago

Experience (see Facebook, in general, and the real name experiment) says that no, your last point does not hold. As it turns out, people are more than happy to be assholes with their names attached, never mind the many others who don't want to make drama and are more than happy to keep hanging out with them.

If you roam around the internet for long enough, in the right public areas, you are bound to find plenty of tales of families choosing to keep hanging out with abusers over the victims, never mind people who are just "being mean on the internet".

[–] VeloRama@feddit.org 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Well, if anonymity is removed also the violent Neo-Nazis (or whatever) is exposed, maybe he would think twice before doing/saying something stupid knowing that nothing stop someone else to make him the victim of harassment or to be treated like an idiot or ignored at work (or any other real life situation) because people find his social accounts and simply decide to not interact with (if not totally boycott) him.

how naive.

a violent neonazi will show up at 3 am at your address with a balaclava. throw a molotov cocktail through your bedroom window and leave before the police arrives.

[–] gian@lemmy.grys.it 1 points 19 hours ago

a violent neonazi will show up at 3 am at your address with a balaclava. throw a molotov cocktail through your bedroom window and leave before the police arrives.

A balaclava don't save you if I know who you are.

The point is that all these supposed "violent neonazi" are what they are because they think that they are "anonimous" on Internet but they have not the balls to do it in the real life, else there would be way more attacks you describe, after all there are a lot of people who already expose themself against them in the real life.

[–] Noja@sopuli.xyz 18 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Should this become reality, hate groups won't even need to doxx people anymore. The law will do it for them.

[–] dubak@feddit.org 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Pavlos Marinakis, the deputy prime minister, clarified that the intention is not to abolish pseudonyms but to ensure that every profile corresponds to a real person.

[–] Darthcapi@lemmy.ml 21 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Greece can eat shit -anonymous social media user

[–] ZkhqrD5o@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Public discourse: made in China.

[–] Octagon9561@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 day ago

Every accusation against China is a confession and in no way related to what's actually going on in China.

[–] saltesc@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)