But Linux is just kennel we need to look at all the gnu components that make Linux a complete os.... Wait maybe not https://drewdevault.com/2023/11/25/2023-11-26-RMS-on-sex.html
this post was submitted on 02 Feb 2026
13 points (100.0% liked)
Linux
66004 readers
399 users here now
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).
Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.
Rules
- Posts must be relevant to operating systems running the Linux kernel. GNU/Linux or otherwise.
- No misinformation
- No NSFW content
- No hate speech, bigotry, etc
Related Communities
Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0
founded 7 years ago
MODERATORS
Something that the society achieved in the last 150 years are two dogmas:
- 5/7 8 hours workweek is a maximum
- people before 18 should not have sex with people after 18
I'm kinda glad that questioning these puts one into a category of weirdos.
He's right that we shouldn't infantilise teenagers by calling them 'children', lumping them in with prepubescent children as if there's no difference between them.
By this logic, anyone who doesn't believe in Marxist Leninism shouldn't use Lemmy. I don't like Windows for other reasons, but the personal life of the person who made it should not be a factor at all. You would in fact be severely limited if you only used products made entirely by people who are 'perfect' in every way.
Did you just put someone wanting to better people's lives through his critic of capitalism as the same as being a billionaire pedophile.
To be fair, Marxism has killed a fuckload of people.
Edit oh no people down voting who don't like the truth
Nowhere in marxism does it say murder x group of people. But in a lot of capitalist ideologies like nazism or zionism it is the norm.
It doesn't have to say to do it when it just consistently happens. It's what we call the quiet part. Sometimes the quiet part gets said out loud but not always. We do get little peeks here and there even when people aren't being mass murdered. Like when anti marxists get murdered and their deaths are widely celebrated amongst marxists.
You also say the quiet part for capitalisms deaths? Or do just go with the flow. Millions of people die from hunger, not because we can't feed them, just because its not profitable to do so. Same with vaccines, no profit from saving people so let them die. Its the most selfish system. At least the communists didn't starve people on purpose.
If he's in the files it's strictly to tear Jeffers apart for submitting a shit code patch and wasting his time.
He'll probably be associated with Satoshi that way, he tried to fund the bitcoin reference client with the intent to use it for untraceable transactions. Bitcoin has always been traceable though.
Bitcoin was probably created for Putin to hide his money. There's suspicious stuff about it in the Epstein files.
That would be a coincidence since Bitcoin was created by a single college kid.
But I've seen SN's website a few years before 2022 when I figured out his identity and Putin knowing his identity would not be surprising considering what was on his main page.
What stuff is being said about in the Epstein files?
Basically, Epstein was the manager of Putin's wealth.
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2010/EFTA01683874.pdf
https://techcrunch.com/2026/01/30/informant-told-fbi-that-jeffrey-epstein-had-a-personal-hacker/
Epstein had some connection to REDACTED from MIT Media Lab and I think that’s Joi Ito.
Epstein tried repeatedly to set up a meeting to sell Putin on the idea of bitcoin in 2014.
That particular meeting fell apart, because Epstein realized it would look terrible to visit Putin so soon after the shootdown of MH17. But I wouldn't be shocked if they did successfully meet sometime later.
Some people have joked that the only practical use case for bitcoin is to make financial crimes much easier. But what if that's not a bug, but a feature? Perhaps the whole objective of bitcoin's invention was to make financial crimes easier for Putin and the Russian mob.
Ito introduced Epstein to Jeremy Rubin (core bitcoin dev), which turned into Epstein directly funding Rubin. Search for "Jeremy Rubin" in the files and you'll find checks to him, docs about the formation of "Deploy Capital LLC", potentially backed with Peter Thiel who was trying to invest in Level One and Bitmain. Iozzo was involved in that stuff too: https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%209/EFTA01005773.pdf
So if that's all true, is bitcoin just a bunch of Putin's money? Nothing here is conclusive, but it isn't so far fetched anymore, either.
But suddenly, this bizzare email exchange makes some sense. Epstein and Ito were panicking about the feds tracking down Putin's wealth, because they knew following the money would lead right back to them.
Also, now we might know where Epstein got his mystery billions! Because they weren't his billions, they were Putin's.
I'm genuinely baffled how many oligarchs had contact with Epstein. I do believe their primary job qualification is a lack of morals, but there's so many ways to be amoral, you don't have to all be friends with the guy that offers pedophilia.
Just oligarchs? Oligarchs don't suprise me at all. The more surprising aspect is so many artists, scientists etc. I guess humans have a weakness for someone who makes them feel like a privileged member of a boy's club.
Noam Chomsky, that's what broke my faith in humanity. His work in linguistics is why I'm a computer scientist, his work in political activism was my introduction to leftist theory, so much of what I do and think every day is directly influenced by his work.
Turns out at the end of the day he's a neo-liberal apartheid supporting hypocrite and possibly a pedophile.
I'm kinda surprised that him proposing that the US should throw Ukraine to the wolves (Russia) didn't completely tank his career. In hindsight, for the past 20 years he's kinda just turned into a tankie (or at least tankie-adjacent) due the the US's misdeeds in Vietnam, Cambodia, Iraq, and Afghanistan.
While the US has done wrong, that doesn't automatically make its adversaries right.
He's also not a billionaire. Him and Jimmy Wales are true heroes of our time. Their work has shaped the modern world yet their fortunes are nowhere near even a single billion. It seems almost absurd and dumb on their part that they didn't even make 1 billion in decades given their impact, but turns out that's just the normal rate of accumulation when you don't just sell out or steal the work of others.
Considering his lack of public statements and actual support for Israel and zionism I'd argue your wrong.
Conservatively moderating a shit show that is Israeli subject matter is one thing (and I've been banned from reddit for pointing out how bat shit insane zionism is) but actively supporting the regime is a completely different thing.