this post was submitted on 29 Apr 2026
55 points (96.6% liked)

science

26799 readers
1279 users here now

A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.

dart board;; science bs

rule #1: be kind

lemmy.world rules

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 5 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] MagnificentSteiner@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Researchers from King’s College London studied 498 infants born in St Thomas’ Hospital, central London, between 2015 and 2020. Of those, 125 were born prematurely, 54 at less than 32 weeks – classifying them as “very and extremely preterm”.

Using their mothers’ home postcodes, the researchers estimated the amount of pollution – including nitrogen dioxide and PM10 and PM2.5 particulate matter – they were exposed to during each trimester of pregnancy. Then, once the infants reached 18 months old, the researchers gave them a standard clinical test to measure cognitive, language and motor skills.

Those infants exposed to high pollution in the first trimester scored on average five to seven points lower on language tests, compared with babies exposed to low pollution. Premature babies exposed to the highest pollution levels in the womb across all of pregnancy scored on average 11 points less for motor skills than those exposed to low levels.

There's absolutely nothing scientific about that at all.

[–] pageflight@piefed.social 2 points 1 hour ago

So many potential confounding factors.

[–] Successful_Try543@feddit.org 2 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)
[–] alienzx@feddit.nl 5 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Babies shouldn't be getting pregnant...

[–] amateurcrastinator@lemmy.world 1 points 29 minutes ago

That is exactly how I read this cursed title!