this post was submitted on 29 Apr 2026
742 points (98.7% liked)

Technology

84277 readers
3361 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The Price of Free Google Report.

Proton analyzed over 54,000 demographic profiles using 2025 ad auction data to estimate what advertisers pay to reach different types of Americans. The range is much wider than you might expect.

The average American generates about $1,605 a year in advertising value. A 35- to 44-year-old man in Bozeman, MT, without children, using a desktop and making high-value corporate searches, generates an estimated $17,929.30. An 18- to 24-year-old father in Fort Smith, AR, using an Android phone and making low-value searches, generates $31.05.

That’s a 577x difference between two people using the same free service.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] bstix@feddit.dk 8 points 11 hours ago

It would be interesting to calculate the user's value of the time wasted on this shit.

My guess is that online advertising has a negative return for society as a whole. It should be illegal.

[–] arcine@jlai.lu 13 points 1 day ago

I wonder how much money people have wasted buying my data. I have ad blockers everywhere, I never see a single ad or sponsored message, if their system actually works it should be marked worthless.

[–] Etterra@discuss.online 21 points 1 day ago (2 children)

You can't generate ad revenue from me if I have ad blockers.

[–] uenticx@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago

Until you log into gmail and give them a fingerprint to share around. They still track you unfortunately.

[–] Aussiemandeus@aussie.zone 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Then how do you support our corporate overloads?

[–] Etterra@discuss.online 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

They'll just have to eat the money they already have.

[–] Aussiemandeus@aussie.zone 5 points 1 day ago

Let them eat cash,

[–] Evotech@lemmy.world 55 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You use an android because you like it

I use an android to drive advertising revenue down

We are not the same

[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 17 points 1 day ago (4 children)

I use an android because Apple has been insufferable about allowing users to run that they want to run and customize their phone how they want to customize their phone.

Google is now showing signs that they want to do the same.

I will move to a linux tablet, watch and a cellular wifi AP if I have to

[–] FG_3479@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago (2 children)

You should try GrapheneOS. It has no Google crap installed by default, and if you install Play Services for apps that need it, it will be sandboxed so it can't track you or limit sideloading.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Epzillon@lemmy.world 58 points 1 day ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (7 children)

This feels like a good post to mention AdNauseam! For anyone who wants an adblocker that helps more than just you! It basically blocks ads but also sends a click request to every ad that should have been loaded. The data being sent with this request contains spoofed garbage data that makes the tracking data sets lose value. It also keeps a funny metric on how much the estimated cost for your clicks is :)

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 24 points 1 day ago

The top 10% of profiles: heavy desktop users — generate 43% of all advertiser value

Helps explain why Microsoft has started injecting ads into the OS so aggressively.

[–] UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 day ago

Im priceless. Or worthless.

[–] Tattorack@lemmy.world 72 points 1 day ago (8 children)

Well let's see...

  • I've used Firefox with uBlock Origins pretty much as soon as uBlock Origins came out. I'm now using Librewolf.
  • Im using a YouTube extention that automatically skips sponsers and adreads.
  • I don't use Google for my searches. Haven't for over 10 years.
  • I use Spotify on my PC, with the Bash Spot X patch.
  • My OS is also Linux, so no built-in ads.
  • On my phone I have AdAway installed.
  • I patched my YouTube app with ReVanced Manager, giving me block against ads, sponsers, and adreads.
  • I don't use Spotify on my phone, instead opting to download music I bought from artists (typically Bandcam) or get through Soulseek.
  • I use Firefox on my phone too, with uBlock Origins. Did that for nearly as long as my PC.
  • I also don't use Google for my searches there.

I'm very curious about what my value to Google is, considering all that.

[–] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 34 points 1 day ago

It's crazy that we have to go to that much effort just to have a reasonably pleasant online experience.

[–] Epzillon@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

Basically same,

  • Linux and Graphene
  • IronFox/Zen Browser with Adnauseam, Sponsorblock, DeArrow and ClearURLs
  • Mullvad VPN with AdBlock (off because of Adnauseam).
  • GrayJay instead of YouTube.
  • SimpMusic + Locally downloaded songs for music.
  • Local media server for movies

Only places i have yet to tighten privacy (AFAIK) is email and chats (did make a burner acc on Discord and deleted the old one though). I dont use social media apart from the fediverse. All those accounts are deleted.

Update:

I do use K9 Mail and Thunderbird for email clients and F-droid and Aurora Store as an app store replacement.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Squizzy@lemmy.world 17 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Your location data. You help with traffic notifications, harveating of networks in relation to your location. Even if you dont use maps.

What is bash x spot?

[–] Tattorack@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago

I got it reversed, it's spot x bash. But it's bash script that modifies the spotify client to remove all ads. Doesn't give you premium features, only removes ads. The script must also be run every time spotify updates.

Check it out.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] hansolo@lemmy.today 7 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Since Feb 2025 Google started using browser fingerprinting to track users. While you don't see the ads, they're still building a profile on you.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] InFerNo@lemmy.ml 16 points 1 day ago (1 children)

High-value, low-value

😑

[–] SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

Google is a femcel

[–] KatherinaReichelt@feddit.org 35 points 1 day ago (2 children)

The average American generates about $1,605 a year in advertising value. A 35- to 44-year-old man in Bozeman, MT, without children, using a desktop and making high-value corporate searches, generates an estimated $17,929.30. An 18- to 24-year-old father in Fort Smith, AR, using an Android phone and making low-value searches, generates $31.05.

Just imagine how much people have to buy through ads to justify this amount of ad spending.

[–] BlackLaZoR@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (6 children)

It's just Americans. Very vulnerable to suggestions and very wealthy at the same time.

[–] FlyingCircus@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Everyone is susceptible to advertising — the principles rely on fundamental human psychology, just the same as propaganda. However, Americans simultaneously are served more ads in their day-to-day than most other places, and also have a captured education system that is designed to create more unthinking consumers.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 162 points 1 day ago (8 children)

Imagine if humanity would spend all this energy and effort into things that would actually benefit humanity world wide. Medicine and medical personnel, food research and production, education, housing, care for the elderly....

Oh man, this world could be so nice...

[–] Debs@lemmy.zip 14 points 1 day ago

I think about this all the time. Tech company spends $19 billion more in ai, etc. Meanwhile, my local school system is firing teachers over a $500,000 shortfall.

[–] Alpha71@lemmy.world 64 points 1 day ago (2 children)

We're still basically monkeys with nukes.

[–] toiletobserver@lemmy.world 31 points 1 day ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] MithranArkanere@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago (2 children)

And the assholes only give me back like 2 bucks.

Tax them and turn that into a UBI.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] osanna@lemmy.vg 52 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I've made it as hard as i can to track me. And I will continue to do so. Fuck advertisers.

[–] FatVegan@leminal.space 15 points 1 day ago (2 children)

At this point it has become my hobby

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] flop_leash_973@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That might be what they pay Google to advertise to those groups. But do they manage to get that much profit out of those advertisements from those groups?

I know it is not true to say that "advertising doesn't work on me" but I wonder if the revenue the advertisers are getting out of that professional man in MT adds up to anywhere close to $17,929/yr worth of sales of their products/services.

[–] belochka@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

Some people might think it's nonsense to pay more to reach some group than it gives directly, but there might be a degree of diffusion such that it's not.

Suppose, that computer-savvy woman is the source of advice for her many friends after trying some things out or whatever.

Suppose, that professional man uses occasionally a free tool for their task, that seems to be "first page in Google", but is in fact the most familiar from 8 things listed on that first page.

Then they use it again or their coworkers or friends know that the tool exists. Then eventually they might buy it.

It's all probabilities, but those that spread.

Why did I even write this, it's obvious.

[–] vogi@piefed.social 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Don't wanna see you slacking doing low-value searches! Brb writing a a script generating some high-level net traffic, so they waste more money on me.

[–] hansolo@lemmy.today 12 points 1 day ago (4 children)

That's not wasting money, that's literally generating money for them.

Buying local and obscuring your searches are how you starve the beast.

[–] vogi@piefed.social 7 points 1 day ago

Oh wait, i forgot i was stupid 😭

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] yaroto98@lemmy.world 38 points 1 day ago (5 children)

I need to start poisioning my data more and make it stupid expensive to advertise to me.

[–] REDACTED@infosec.pub 31 points 1 day ago (4 children)

I just got this ad which just felt hilarious as I've no connections to Ghana

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] arc99@lemmy.world 17 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

I expect my price is through the floor. Living in Ireland with ad blocker enabled and Google set to disable ad tracking and personalized ad delivery. Even when I use their YouTube app and am compelled to see ads, many of them are bottom of the barrel garbage for pay to win games / casinos and outright scams because Google can't match a more lucrative campaign against me.

It's funny because I also listen to podcasts on Spotify and the podcasts are so bereft of matching campaigns the ad break starts and stops almost instantly. The only one that doesn't is Behind the Bastards which repeatedly inflicts 2 minutes of plugs for other Cool Zone Media podcasts that I'm habituated to auto skip through.

load more comments (2 replies)

Wild that one of the most desirable regions, Durham NC, is within 1 hr of one of the least, Greensboro NC.

[–] Crystalbound@lemmy.world 65 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (27 children)

What defines advertising value to calculate this?

I dont buy anything online, Amazon or otherwise. And I dont engage with any ads unless by mistake. I suppose there is value in market research itself but nobody is making any sales revenue off somebody like me.

[–] TheTechnician27@lemmy.world 139 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (13 children)

but nobody is making any sales revenue off somebody like me.

Everybody who thinks this is definitely having sales revenue made off of them. It needs to be restated forever in discussions like this that the metric for success in online advertising is not largely "oh shit, I could go for one of those right now".

Those are what stick out in our mind because we remember them. I really did see an ad for Roblox as a kid and immediately go start playing. But sooooo much of advertising is subconscious to a point that we couldn't possibly measure its true effect except by statistics.

Even beyond what we purchase: I've been bombarded with sponsorships for Raycons for years. Even with SponsorBlock on YouTube, sometimes they leak through. I will never buy a Raycon product. But I still occasionally talk about them, inadvertently advertising them, simply because they're a good punching bag. I watched a whole video reviewing what pieces of shit Raycons are. Fuck it: I'm talking about Raycon right now. And that's still among the worst-case scenarios for the advertiser. So much of advertising isn't "I want this product now" or even "this product looks desirable"; it's headspace.

The idea that advertisers' psychological manipulation just doesn't work on certain people needs to die and stay dead. If you saw it, it had an effect on you, and any effect is a better effect than nothing. If you realize an advertisement worked on you, the advertisement has failed part of its job.

[–] morto@piefed.social 53 points 2 days ago

People think they're not targets because they don't do certain things, but not being part of a group also says a lot about you! User blocking ads? This is information about you. User doesn't buy online? Also information about you. Everything is information and everything together is a valuable consumer profile

load more comments (12 replies)
load more comments (26 replies)
[–] RabbitBBQ@lemmy.world 32 points 1 day ago (4 children)

What's really crazy is that other than the fact all of this data is collected about you and freely sold among all these companies while it's nearly impossible to see your own information or try to correct inaccuracies. It's like a social credit score and online systems are very good at following people between devices.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] fiat_lux@lemmy.zip 40 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Link is to a shit pdf on a proton drive. It's a basic description of the Google auction house. The prices they list are largely driven by the bids advertisers place, but that's not to say Google doesn't charge a bigger minimum for different demographic segments, they very much do. As does Facebook etc.

For example, one reason that parents are worth less is because of the products they listed. Diapers cost less than business lawyers, so the margins are much slimmer, so advertisers aren't going to bid as much for an ad placement.

It does miss one thing that is, in my opinion, one of the more revolting aspects of their auction house. As a bidder your dollar is worth less than a big company's dollar, even as little as one tenth. You could bid a million dollars on an ad space that Apple only bid $100001 on and you'd lose. That gap is dynamically calculated (at least in part) based on comparative search rankings.

Here's the text without their ad at the end:

The Price of Free Google

What the Ad Industry Pays to Target Americans

A Proton Mail analysis of 54,216 advertiser-defined profiles across the U.S.

The price of your attention

Every user has a price

Every Google search triggers an invisible, real-time auction where advertisers bid for access to your attention. These bids are calculated in milliseconds based on how likely you are to spend. This is how the system decides what you are worth to advertisers.

Proton analyzed 54,216 advertiser-defined profiles across 251 U.S. cities using real ad-market pricing.

● Highest-value user: $17,929/year
● Lowest-value user: $31/year

That’s a 577x difference. This disparity is not an anomaly — it is the business model.

“Google doesn’t just build a profile from the information you knowingly provide. If you sign up for services, click ads, or ignore others, that creates signals the system can use to infer much more than you realize. It can start with age or interests, then expand into assumptions about income, family status, political leanings, or religion.
When the system isn’t sure, it tests those assumptions by serving different ads, links, or recommendations and watching how you respond. It doesn’t just tracking who you are. It’s constantly learning, so it can price access to you more precisely.”
— Eamonn Maguire, Director of Engineering, Machine Learning & AI

Who the system values most — and least These two profiles illustrate how the same system assigns radically different value.

$17,929/year
● 35–44, male
● Bozeman, MT
● Not a parent
● Desktop, heavy user

High-intent, high-margin services:
● business lawyer
● home renovation
● golf courses

$31/year
● 18–24, male
● Fort Smith, AR
● Parent
● Android, casual user

Price-sensitive, lower-margin searches:
● cheap diapers
● family apartments
● toddler clothes

Same system. Same country. 577x difference.

Value is not distributed equally
The gap between the average and the median shows that a small number of high-value users disproportionately influence the system.

The top 10% of users generate 43% of total value.

● Average value: $1,605/year
● Median value: $760/year

Most users are worth far less than the system’s top performers.

How your value is calculated

Your value is constantly recalculated

Your value is not fixed. It is continuously recalculated based on signals that predict the likelihood of a commercially valuable action.

These signals include:
● What you search
● When you search
● What device you use
● Who you are inferred to be

High-intent searches — such as legal services, insurance, or financial products — command significantly higher prices than general browsing or informational queries. Your value can change from one moment to the next depending on what you do. In this system, behavior matters more than time spent

The signals behind the price

Your device changes your value

Device usage has a measurable impact on how users are valued.
● Desktop: $2,894/year
● iPhone: $1,338/year
● Android: $585/year

Desktop users are worth nearly 5x more than Android users — even when everything else is the same.

These differences reflect observed behavior — including conversion rates and commercial intent — not the cost of the device itself. Your device becomes a proxy for purchasing behavior.

Parents are systematically valued less

Parental status affects how users are priced within the system.

Non-parents are worth ~17% more on average.

The gap increases during peak earning years:
● 25–34: +24%
● 35–44: +34.5%

Having children reduces your perceived commercial value.

Same age — same location — same device. Different value.

Value peaks in midlife

User value is highest between the ages of 25 and 44.

This period corresponds with:
● Major financial decisions
● High-value purchases
● Career-related services

As users age, overall value declines — but does not disappear. For users 65+, approximately 75% of value is concentrated in:

● Health
● Real estate
● Financial planning

The system adapts by narrowing focus rather than reducing targeting.

Gender is not a primary driver of value

Gender has a measurable but limited impact on how users are priced within the ad ecosystem.

Average values across genders are broadly similar — with differences in the single digits.

Differences in value are driven primarily by how advertisers price categories of demand — not by gender alone. Higher-value industries — such as finance, legal services, and B2B technology — tend to influence outcomes more strongly than identity itself.

As a result, gender can affect value indirectly, but it is not a consistent or defining factor.

Where you live affects what you’re worth

Local economies shape how much advertisers are willing to pay for access to users.

Location alone can dramatically change what you’re worth.

Highest-value markets include:

  1. Edmond, OK
  2. Bozeman, MT
  3. Naperville, IL
  4. Santa Fe, NM
  5. Durham, NC

Lowest-value markets include:
247. Greensboro, NC
248. Gulfport, MS
249. Fort Smith, AR
250. Lowell, MA
251. West Valley City, UT

More usage means more value

Frequency of use acts as a multiplier on user value.

● Heavy users: $3,611/year
● Average users: $843/year
● Casual users: $362/year

Heavy users generate nearly 10x more value than casual users. More usage doesn’t just increase your value — it multiplies it.

This creates strong incentives to maximize engagement.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›