no. like, the term "working class" can be interpreted in two ways: (1) people who are inherently workers, (2) people who are forced to work to survive.
which one is being replaced?
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
no. like, the term "working class" can be interpreted in two ways: (1) people who are inherently workers, (2) people who are forced to work to survive.
which one is being replaced?
Neither & both. Currently, the entire deck is being reshuffled. It's a Schrodinger moment for humans.
The current state of everything could easily be avoided if we didn't exist at all, or at least (in theory) never did to begin with.
It’s a Schrodinger moment for humans.
who you truly are, you can only find out, if you look inside!
Exactly, gold star for this one!!!
heh, somebody gets my references ^^
I don't mean to lead you to ~~friedrich~~ fret, but sometimes references can be a bit ~~Nietzsche~~ niche. Not everyone has the capacity to Pavlov a mint reference.
Anyone got a mirror of the post? I'm getting this error message:
Sorry, a potential security risk was detected in your submitted request. The Webmaster has been alerted.
Reference ID: 18.a104d217.1777692249.4596f77
You can proceed to www.senate.gov.
If this problem persists, please contact the Office of the Secretary Webmaster at webmaster@sec.senate.gov.
Clicking the www.senate.gov link gives the same error message.
Sanders is currently obsessed with this idea that AI will take everyone’s jobs. It’s all he posts about on social media.
I think it’s unfortunate that he is so laser focused on this, because AI doesn’t really work as well as it’s being hyped. And it’s turning out to be more expensive than using human beings in a lot of contexts. A lot of businesses are using it as a cover story for layoffs, so they don’t have to blame their own poor decisions and leaderships. “Oh, it wasn’t my fault profits were down, it was the AI!” But instead of digging deeper, he’s just buying into and repeating the hype.
LLMs and current generative AI won't. But there will be better AI systems in the future.
And consider the scale of the datacenters they're building: New AI data center in Utah will generate and consume more than twice the amount of power the entire state uses. They're installing 9GW of natural gas turbines on site. They're planning for better AI that will be much different from the current batch.
While we all know that current AI is much worse than human work, consider that they might just use it anyway, and not care that their product is shit.
Sadly, Bernie is - and always has been - just a politician. One of the few good ones, but still out there playing the popular angles. AI taking everyone's job is the popular angle of the moment.
He got sold a bad narrative about AI by a guy who runs an AI doom cult in the Bay Area. (The cult leader also got funded by the same industry. Go figure.)
With that in mind, what he took away from those meetings isn't great, but it's the best possible result of them.
I think its more about "meet the people where they are at". "AI" is in the zeitgeist and is useful as a focal point for the fact that its a really small club and you ain't in it.
Eliezer Yudkowsky is not the people. He is a cult leader. He is less a meeting of "the people" as Ron Hubbard himself.
Someday, history will look back at Sanders as an evil evil man. Not because he was/is an evil man, but because his messages flies in the face of what billionaires want. So when they falsely write how evil Sanders was, it will be just as false as how the south tries to paint John Brown in a villainous attire.