That's comforting that they could be that way and be running silent from ATC and other aircraft anywhere. What could go wrong?
Rhaedas
Nothing will happen because it's US military, but shame on those pilots because you know THEY saw the JetBlue coming their way, knew the route they'd take, and didn't give a shit. They didn't even have to say anything, just change course.
If it's slow, then it's the central backup and you use anything else for regular use. Just having it as a fallback for recovery would be huge.
"A picture of" is implied in the title.
The actual selfie was a live feed to Putin where Zelenskyy was shouting, "I don't see no damn soldiers here, bro!", followed by "If you want it, come and claim it!". Then he unsheathed a big sword.
Still doesn't top the video years ago of him doing a similar thing after Russian claims of hits, with Zelenskyy revealing he was sitting at the desk in the same location.
Yes, it's on the list too at 33 MJ/L. Lower than conventional, but still higher than ethanol. The usual mix for drop in use with typical diesel engines is 10% bio/90% conventional. It's a good use of recycled material vs. just disposal.
Than gasoline or diesel? No, they don't. Wikipedia has a large chart on their article for energy density of various sources. Some things are harder to directly compare with each other, but diesel has 38 MJ/L, with jet fuel/kerosene and gasoline at 36/35. Adding ethanol dilutes the energy output some, while pure ethanol is 24. It's still a potent source (but with its own costs and effects that need to be included in the net equation). Chemically petroleum simply has more bonds to break and get energy from.
I'm sure Republicans will honor their promises. Oh, look at the price of this bridge...
They're all code names "Al".
I know, I see that all the time, people apologizing for their English second language use, while being far clearer in imparting their meaning (which is the only important thing in the end) than so many single use American posters.
we can go higher than 1000, he can afford it. Let's multiple it by 420 and then 69. He'd probably go for it just because of how he is with stupid things like that.
That has its own slope of discrimination from data due to being able to pay or not. If we determine a certain thing is okay ethically to screen for, anyone should be able to get it. Bad enough to have one gray area, we don't need a gradient of gray everywhere.
Right. I actually don't have an issue with them not having a transponder on. That was the least of the problems. But not being aware of standard traffic around an airport... come on.