this post was submitted on 14 Dec 2025
422 points (99.1% liked)

World News

51300 readers
2609 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A JetBlue flight from the small Caribbean nation of Curaçao halted its ascent to avoid colliding with a US air force refueling tanker on Friday, and the pilot blamed the military plane for crossing his path.

“We almost had a midair collision up here,” the JetBlue pilot said, according to a recording of his conversation with air traffic control. “They passed directly in our flight path ... They don’t have their transponder turned on, it’s outrageous.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 74 points 1 day ago (12 children)

Nothing will happen because it's US military, but shame on those pilots because you know THEY saw the JetBlue coming their way, knew the route they'd take, and didn't give a shit. They didn't even have to say anything, just change course.

[–] logicbomb@lemmy.world 90 points 1 day ago (11 children)

The US military has had many incidents where it was sloppy as shit. I wouldn't completely write off the idea that they might just be a lot more incompetent than most people think.

[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 26 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That's comforting that they could be that way and be running silent from ATC and other aircraft anywhere. What could go wrong?

[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 20 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

It's not just US aircraft. Most military aircraft have the ability to turn off their transponders. That's kinda SOP when flying a mission.

The main difference with many US military aircraft is that they have a tiny radar cross sections, so ATC can't "see" them, not just can't "hear" them. That refuling plane should have shown on radar, transponder or not. That thing is literally about the size of three barns, not the nuclear physics kind, and literally can't have much in the way of radar stealth the way the plane it was refueling probably had.

The other main difference here is that normally our joint chiefs, and secretary of defense ~~war~~ don't have their head up their asses about OPSEC. Normally such an operation would have not come anywhere near civilian flight paths, but these assholes literally said that the troops should be "drawing fire."

[–] freeman@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 day ago

Civilian aircraft can also turn off their transponders, not that it's relevant.

ATC not having radar is not an issue, the US military most certainly had multiple radars in range. They could tell the tanker to divert way earlier. They wanted an incident.

As for normalcy, the US is part of a small group of countries that has shot down civilian airliners.

[–] theyoyomaster@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago

Most of the world doesn’t have decent primary radar, especially out over international waters like where this occurred. Likely just a low frequency radar that can say “yup, there’s something out there” but not “he is right there.” The world works on transponders.

[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 7 points 1 day ago

Right. I actually don't have an issue with them not having a transponder on. That was the least of the problems. But not being aware of standard traffic around an airport... come on.

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)