this post was submitted on 01 May 2026
358 points (96.4% liked)

Mildly Infuriating

46101 readers
593 users here now

Home to all things "Mildly Infuriating" Not infuriating, not enraging. Mildly Infuriating. All posts should reflect that. Please post actually infuriating posts to !actually_infuriating@lemmy.world

I want my day mildly ruined, not completely ruined. Please remember to refrain from reposting old content. If you post a post from reddit it is good practice to include a link and credit the OP. I'm not about stealing content!

It's just good to get something in this website for casual viewing whilst refreshing original content is added overtime.


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means: -No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...


7. Content should match the theme of this community.


-Content should be Mildly infuriating. If your post better fits !Actually_Infuriating put it there.

-The Community !actuallyinfuriating has been born so that's where you should post the big stuff.

...


8. Reposting of Reddit content is permitted, but attribution is not required in any way. No links to Reddit in post body


-If you would like to provide a source link, do so in the comments but not in the post body.

...

...


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Lemmy Review

2.Lemmy Be Wholesome

3.Lemmy Shitpost

4.No Stupid Questions

5.You Should Know

6.Credible Defense


Reach out to LillianVS for inclusion on the sidebar.

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Sorry for the shit image quality but here's another ad by the same company for a better idea of it

Flew over the may day rally in San Francisco.

They're dabbing on us

/- Matt christman

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Bonesince1997@lemmy.world 133 points 3 weeks ago (26 children)

Flown in a plane by a human.

[–] fahfahfahfah@lemmy.billiam.net 38 points 3 weeks ago

Give it time, soon enough they’ll be AI planes crashing all around us and it will be considered “progress”

[–] sanguinepar@lemmy.world 5 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Can't speak for this specific instance of course, but in the UK you occasionally get people flying messages over football ⚽ grounds or whatever, and I have read more than once that the company doing the flying don't actually know what message they are pulling - they just get the packaged up message and fly it where the customer asks them to.

Don't know if that's true, though and it's arguable whether that absolves them completely of responsibility for the message being shown.

EDIT - that being said, the first example I found contradicts me - here, the message was known by everyone, including the pilot!

https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/26783751

EDIT 2 - a particularly nasty example here, where someone mentions banners not being checked. They definitely should have been.

https://news.sky.com/story/outraged-airport-bans-banner-flights-after-white-lives-matter-burnley-stunt-12013293

"Due to the nature of the activity, banners are not checked before take-off and the content is at the operator's discretion."

load more comments (24 replies)
[–] AmbitiousProcess@piefed.social 118 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

This company is known for this. To clarify, I mean known for making deliberately inflammatory ads, then showing them as obtrusively or carelessly as possible, because it gets people to post about it.

The only reason their company got popular in the first place was when they put these ads everywhere to piss people off and generate engagement.

https://startupsmagazine.co.uk/article-clickbait-stop-hiring-humans-marketing-campaign-made-artisan-go-viral

"The goal of the campaign was always to rage bait"

This guerrilla marketing approach, combined with traditional media coverage and tactics, led to significant success. Artisan saw a remarkable +197% growth in brand search traffic, quickly establishing itself as the most well-known AI employee creator.

[–] mimavox@piefed.social 17 points 3 weeks ago

Yeah, it's just a cringey PR-stunt.

[–] Not_mikey@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 3 weeks ago

Damn, while I fell for it. Hopefully this won't give them any business

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 12 points 3 weeks ago

Oh yeah, rage sells even better than pornography.

Meta and Google etc realised this years ago already and tuned their algorithms for this. Get people enraged, they'll scroll more and see more ads, more revenue! It'll enrage people, divide people, get them to vote for the worst candidates, like Trump.

Tech companies have ruined and continue to ruin the world and right bros are full on aiming to end it for all of us so that they can live in some utopia whole the rest of us are dead or suffering

Sounds super conspiratorial? Thiel, Musk, as a few good examples

[–] reddig33@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago

Wow we paid for all this search traffic! Didn’t get many new customers, but just think of all the brand engagement!

[–] Maerman@lemmy.world 51 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

I am irreplacable. I'd like to see AI drink 12 beers and disappoint my girlfriend sexually.

[–] ceenote@lemmy.world 17 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Just because AI can't do that doesn't mean I couldn't replace you.

[–] Maerman@lemmy.world 16 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

Fair point. But can you spend 4 hours not getting sound to work on a Linux distro?

[–] ceenote@lemmy.world 14 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I've spent my whole life doing that.

[–] Maerman@lemmy.world 7 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I seem to have met my match. We are both telepathetic, it seems.

[–] WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 9 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Gentlemen, gentlemen, please! One at a time! We can ALL disappoint this guys girlfriend TOGETHER! Just everybody take a number! I believe I'm third...

[–] Maerman@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago

That's the spirit. With cooperation and a little bit of luck, we can reach unthinkable levels of disappointment.

[–] A_norny_mousse@piefed.zip 39 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Ragebait. It'll sell like hot cakes.

[–] Emotional_Engi@lemmy.zip 22 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

And I'm falling for it. Promoting such thing is outrageous.

[–] A_norny_mousse@piefed.zip 4 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Agreed. What I meant is the target group: they probably love the idea that this is offensive and inhuman.

It's also bullshit. A lie, a boundless exaggeration.

edit: "piss people off and generate engagement", see @ambitiousprocess@piefed.social's comment.

[–] SubArcticTundra@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 weeks ago

Yup. VC works on creating (bad) hype

[–] NecroticEuphoria@lemmy.ml 16 points 3 weeks ago
[–] Jaysyn@lemmy.world 15 points 3 weeks ago

AI can't do your job, but some saleman will convince your idiot boss that it can.

[–] jtrek@startrek.website 13 points 3 weeks ago

I see a lot of ads for ai slop on the subway and I refuse to engage with them. I don't look them up. Fuck 'em.

Sometimes people vandalize them and if I saw someone doing so, I don't know what you're talking about.

[–] pewgar_seemsimandroid@lemmy.blahaj.zone 13 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

how much does a lazer cost?

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 6 points 3 weeks ago

Depends how big. The one I want is like almost a thousand dollars.

[–] Amberskin@europe.pub 2 points 3 weeks ago

What about a Stinger missile?

[–] finallymadeanaccount@lemmy.world 13 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

All right. But AI is gonna have a tough time expressing my fox terrior's anal glands!

[–] ivanafterall@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago

Soon AI will be touching your dog in ways you could never.

[–] hark@lemmy.world 10 points 3 weeks ago

Why would you hire humans when you can spend a lot of money on a totally incompetent, yet incredibly arrogant chatbot instead?

[–] vinceman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Whoever thought of this should have to breath solely from the exhaust port of a data center.

[–] WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today 8 points 3 weeks ago

Well, the goal was always to turn the universe into a dead soup that a handful of sick fucks play god in.

[–] moseschrute@lemmy.world 8 points 3 weeks ago
[–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world 7 points 3 weeks ago

If that plane has a human pilot...

[–] Sunflier@lemmy.world 6 points 3 weeks ago
[–] CanadaPlus@futurology.today 6 points 3 weeks ago

Flew over the may day rally in San Francisco.

Don't take the bait.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 3 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (10 children)

At least they are finally saying it out loud - AI and Automation is here to totally replace human workers. None of this "Your job won't be replaced by AI, it will be replaced by someone who knows AI," because that ONE person who knows AI is going to replace THOUSANDS of jobs.

I've been saying since before Covid that unregulated AI is going to cause a permanent double-digit unemployment rate of 20%, 30%, 40%, very possibly higher, and I've been savaged for it. Yet last night, ABC reported that within 10 years, there will be 170,000 autonomous trucks on the road. That's 170,000 permanently unemployed truck drivers. What are they going to do make an alternative living and match that income? Uber says on their website that they intend to replace their fleet with autonomous cars, and has a partnership with Waymo, with a plan to roll out on Atlanta soon. That's been a job that LOTS of unemployed, or underemployed people can do, and now that's going away.

And it's just the start. I just read how the tech leaders in SF are quietly worrying about the giant looming unemployment class that AI is going to produce. It's already happening with GPT-1, what's it going to be like when it's evolved to GPT-7, and it can do most jobs better than humans?

‘Catastrophe in the making,’ tech expert warns about AI

After replacing half his workforce with AI, the Salesforce CEO brought in an Elon Robot to stagger around the office and be less helpful than a toddler, then:

Salesforce’s CEO gave the robot a glowing review. “Elon’s Tesla Optimus is here! Dawn of the physical Agentforce revolution, tackling human work for $200K–$500K. Productivity game-changer!” he wrote on X.

He's so GIDDY about his dumb robot, that he can't hide his glee in replacing every single disgusting human who works for him.

Tech experts are finally voicing extreme worry about what our country will look like when there are millions of permanently unemployed people, and a government who treats them like it's their fault. The government should already be discussing this issue, and they simply won't. AI policy for BOTH parties right now is to do absolutely NOTHING. Don't even hint at any kind of regulatory policies, job protections, robot taxes, UBI, etc. And that includes DEMOCRATS.

And why are they worried? Because hungry, hopeless people will do seriously desperate things for their children, and if they band together, every single rich person will die a gruesome death. And there are a lot of rich people in Silicon valley, and beyond. When the floodgates finally open, there will be no stopping it.

The question is: How will The Government handle the excess unemployed workers? Will they have UBI, and encourage them to create innovative products and businesses? Will they create great great art? Will they recognize that by giving people a satisfying life it makes a safer America for everyone?

Or will they just decide that they want to keep those profits for themselves, and they don't want to pay for those increasingly dangerous people, and eliminate them?

Which party will choose which strategy?

load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›