this post was submitted on 02 May 2026
847 points (98.7% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

39625 readers
3957 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] StarvingMartist@sh.itjust.works 5 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

Whelp, looks like PCs will become a thing of the past at this rate, no use denying it

[–] NeonNight@lemmy.world 1 points 5 minutes ago

They’re already trying to price consumers out of the computer/parts market so that we have to rent them. It’s not helping that so much tech is going to data centers instead of the consumer market

[–] ssfckdt@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 5 hours ago

Already there. Ask any major website what their user agent stats are. Amazon is something like 90% mobile. I can't even fathom doing any serious shopping via app.

[–] ssfckdt@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 5 hours ago

Millennials helped tech destroy the personal computer and computer literacy because they insisted on flocking to these stupid iphones and shiny apps instead of doing anything real and with their own ability.

[–] Washedupcynic@lemmy.ca 4 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

Gen alpha grew up using tablets/smartphones pretty early, while they may not have had access to a PC. Seems like a failure of the educational system. Boomers just refuse to learn new shit.

[–] mosspiglet@lemmy.world 5 points 6 hours ago

My kid has "tech class", where I (wrongly) assumed they would learn about computers and the internet, how they work and how to use them. Nope, they just learned how to use Microsoft Teams.

[–] NikkiDimes@lemmy.world 2 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

Learning new shit gets genuinely harder as you age. With how fast technology changes, I don't think you can really blame them for it.

I'd like to think I'd keep up with technology in my old age, but who knows. I'm not even old and I'm already so damn jaded.

[–] ponypuncher@lemmy.world 2 points 10 hours ago

Trends are cyclical

[–] Jankatarch@lemmy.world 9 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

See I don't entirely blame young people here. I downloaded a linux distro from their torrent mirror last year and my ISP started emailing me literal threats about piracy laws. It's the corporations.

(Tho I am pretty young myself for lemmy standards tbf)

[–] adam_y@lemmy.world 3 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Hey, if only we could blame the generation in charge of raising Alpha and making sure they knew how to tech?

Fuck. Us? Really?

[–] mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca 3 points 9 hours ago

my mom made sure that we learned how to type effectively, and goddamn was she ever right about that. it amazes me how many people cannot type quickly on a keyboard.

[–] radiowaffle@lemmy.blahaj.zone 24 points 1 day ago

I watched a gen alpha iPad kid play a Nintendo DS recently. He held it on his lap and only mashed his thumbs on all the controls, fingers splayed wide. Raged like hell at it. A piece of me died.

[–] Zombie@feddit.uk 95 points 1 day ago
[–] postnataldrip@lemmy.world 107 points 2 days ago (7 children)

Joking aside I do actually worry about how superficial technical knowledge is becoming.

[–] djdarren@piefed.social 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)

To play devil's advocate, I imagine your view isn't too far removed from folks who know to work on their cars being aghast that no one knows how to fix their own any more.

Computers are tools, and the more complex they become the harder it is to learn how to use and repair them.

[–] postnataldrip@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I guess my point was more about it being an issue in professional settings as well, where the people should be technical.

One of technology's biggest achievements is making it such that someone who doesn't care how something works doesn't need to worry about that in order to use it.

[–] djdarren@piefed.social 6 points 1 day ago

Oh aye, I do get where you're coming from.

The company I work for is run by a guy who wishes it was the '70s still, so it's been an uphill battle to introduce some level of technology into our workflows. We're getting there bit by bit, but I still get regularly blindsided by people who just don't know how certain technologies work, and worse; don't really care to learn. I'm talking about people who don't know how to scan a QR code to access a form we need them to input data into, that kind of thing.

That shit keeps me honest, and helps me to remember that while I might know to use SSH to run tasks on a little server I have at work, most people barely know more than how to access Facebook. But that's fine, because some of those guys in the workshop can do things with an engine that mystifies me.

[–] slaacaa@lemmy.world 27 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

We just need to integrate conversational AI into everything, so people never have to understand tech or learn to use it

Tap for spoiler/s

[–] krashmo@lemmy.world 37 points 2 days ago (2 children)

It's always been that way. Even most people who used the internet "way back when" have no clue how it actually functions. Terms like DNS and IPv4 are vaguely familiar concepts at best outside of professional or hobbyist circles.

There's nothing inherently wrong with that either. There's too much stuff for any one person to know. You learn the stuff that interests you and ignore the rest, which hopefully means somebody is interested in all of it. That's why it's good that there's all different kinds of people out there.

Yup. It’s the old “you don’t need to be a baker to enjoy eating bread” thing. The tricky part is that technology has been shoehorned into basically every aspect of life, so there are comparatively a lot of people who don’t know how to “bake” it. If someone doesn’t like bread, they simply won’t eat it. But that’s not really possible with modern technology, outside of near complete rejection of modernity like the Amish.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Zombie@feddit.uk 13 points 1 day ago

Aye, we've almost all learned digital skills. And as time passes the skills required to perform digital tasks reduces as user interfaces and automation improve. What many of us don't have however is digital understanding.

This is from a speech by the founder of lastminute.com and now member of the UK's House of Lords

We have let these things come upon us, but it is not too late to wake up. If we want to change this dynamic and shape the future, we need to recapture some of the internet’s original promise and more of its positive transformative power. That means we need to understand – at all levels of society – what our digital world really is. We need to address the challenges that already exist and preempt the ones we don’t know about.

We live our digital lives this way because we have the skills to do so. 91% of us in the UK have the ability to use the internet. This is a remarkable achievement – and it’s important to continue the work to close the remaining gap and include those who are still without the skills or the access to use the internet.

But we also need to move beyond skills to understanding. Nearly all UK internet users have the digital skills to use a search engine, but only half know how to distinguish between search results and adverts. Around two-thirds of our digitally skilled population can shop and bank online – but a third don’t make any checks before entering their personal or financial information online. More than 1.4 million of us work in tech-related jobs – but, as the recent WannaCry attack showed us, hardly anyone is investing the time, resources or expertise to keep our systems safe. The list goes on.

Becoming a nation of people with digital understanding will be different and more complicated than becoming a nation of people with digital skills. For starters, digital skills are tangible and teachable: download this app, program this device. They also reinforce the idea that digital is something we do – time-bound and transactional.

But in a world where we spend more time online than we do asleep and where everything from our televisions to our kettles can connect to the internet, digital is something we are. Understanding is not a race to be run and won. It is a lifelong process of learning, one unique to each of us.

The full speech is available here. It was given in the House of Lords and is obviously directed towards UK parliamentarians but the concepts apply globally. I recommend reading the whole thing.

[–] dream_weasel@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 day ago

People these days couldnt even manually resolve an IRQ conflict!

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] DmMacniel@feddit.org 109 points 2 days ago (1 children)

But both know how to use apps. What more can Corpos ask for?

[–] Gullible@sh.itjust.works 83 points 2 days ago (11 children)

I hate how true this is. Watching teens flail and panic at the library as they have to spontaneously learn how to use a non-chromeOS computer has been an upsettingly nostalgic reminder of one of my first jobs

[–] HexesofVexes@lemmy.world 61 points 2 days ago (3 children)

The key concept conflict is they think files are inside apps (I teach some basic IT in one of my modules).

When asked to locate an excel file on their computer they point at excel and say the file is in excel. If you show them a .txt file, they'll claim it's in notepad.

The idea that a file is like a book, and the program is the glasses you use to read it, and their computer is the bookshelf seems to resonate well though. Then you just have to fight the clusterfuck that is Apple's file storage, since most bring an apple device to uni.

[–] thebestaquaman@lemmy.world 3 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (1 children)

the clusterfuck that is Apple's file storage

Out of genuine curiosity: What makes this so bad? I've been in similar teaching situations myself, and find that Finder in column-view is pretty helpful for helping people learn to navigate their file system. One of the first things I do is drop a link to the root folder in their favourites-menu in Finder, then tell them to try to navigate to whatever they need from there, and open it with "Open with". Usually, they start understanding the concept of a file system pretty quickly after that.

Edit: The fuckery that is "iCloud trying to trick you into thinking that files on the cloud are actually stored locally" can go fuck itself though. I've had way too many cases of people suddenly discovering that they have exactly zero files on their computer, because "Desktop" and "Documents" turned out to be links to iCloud...

[–] HexesofVexes@lemmy.world 1 points 17 hours ago

Yeah, it's the iCloud-local issue. I swear, almost all of them default to that.

It plays fine with R 90% of the time, but when it borks it takes FOREVER to troubleshoot!

[–] Gullible@sh.itjust.works 40 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

It can be even more fundamental than that. I’ve seen people cocking their heads at the existence of multiple windows and programs running simultaneously. As in, “whoa, where’d my assignment go?” after they click on the browser. They’re used to everything running through a single window due to school computers offering everything through the browser. It’s terrifying to me.

[–] HexesofVexes@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

Honestly, I've not had that one but I've seen something close. Some students are unaware they need to manually save sometimes, they just assume autosave is always there.

For Microsoft office this tends to be ok (OneDrive default doing something good for once), but once they step out (into SPSS/minitab/R) there is always some lost work in the first two weeks.

[–] MeatPilot@sh.itjust.works 25 points 2 days ago

they point at excel and say the file is in excel.

load more comments (10 replies)

On a side note, I would regularly get my silent generation grandmother to fix something on my smartphone when they first started getting popular. I miss her.

[–] lugal@sopuli.xyz 52 points 2 days ago (3 children)

In Because Internet, Gretchen McCulloch argues that there are three waves of "internet people". The first was "before it was cool", the second when it became mainstream (give or take the turn of the millennium) and the third when internet was already a thing. The third are young people, too young to remember the 1900s and therefore the time before internet, and old people who go online because it's unavoidable and also more intuitive and easy than ever before.

Despite the generation gap, they have things in common and in contrast to the first and second wave (which she also subdivides but that's beside the point). For example they never used mail as primary communication and they have smartphones as first device and most often second hand from a family member.

Thanks for listening to my Ted Talk and sorry if I took your shitpost too serious but there's truth and science behind it and I couldn't not share it.

[–] orbituary@lemmy.dbzer0.com 46 points 2 days ago (3 children)

I wish we'd refer to early internet era as something other than the 1900s. WWW ostensibly started in 95. Maybe we just call it "The 90s" and be good with it?

When we start referring to the "turn of the century" as the early 2000s, I may just outright die.

[–] elephantium@lemmy.world 1 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Eh, WWW started in '91. What milestone happened in '95? Only thing I can think of is Windows 95, but that was a general computer thing, not an Internet thing.

As for early Internet era...to me that's the mid to late 70s up through '91. TCP/IP dates back to '74, so that's a workable starting point (or maybe ARPANET, ha).

[–] orbituary@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Eh, I got my dates wrong from memory. My point is still the same.

[–] elephantium@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Fair enough! I'm also Old Enough that hearing about my childhood as "the 1900s" kinda hurts. Just feels wrong somehow, y'know?

[–] orbituary@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

I mean, that was the point of the comment you initially responded to.

[–] elephantium@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago

I know, I thought I'd expand on it

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Blackout@fedia.io 28 points 2 days ago (8 children)

I feel so powerful. I can develop in JavaScript, PHP and actionscript. All the hottest languages of the year 2000

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›