thebestaquaman

joined 3 years ago

I get it, I'm not saying this is something everyone does or should be doing, I think it's just one of many things that underscores how messed up US cops are.

Fair enough.. you guys have a pretty severe cop problem :/

[–] thebestaquaman@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I'm not very familiar with the US, but I've driven borrowed cars through several countries over here in Europe without any other documentation that "Trust me bro, I'm borrowing this car" on plenty of occasions. In that regard it seems pretty strange that you would need more documentation to bring a car across state lines in the US.

Also, it's pretty common here in Europe for people living near the border to shop on the other side (groceries or whatever). I can't imagine it's any less common in the US for people to have nearby shops in the next state.

[–] thebestaquaman@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (6 children)

"I'm going to head over to the store"

"One sec, let me just write you a note saying that I allowed you to borrow my car"

An interaction dreamed up by the utterly deranged.

Just to be clear, I'm not criticising your explanation here. I just think it's kind of absurd how US cops seem to act. Just the idea that you could be suspected of stealing a car if you don't own the car you're driving just seems crazy to me.

[–] thebestaquaman@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago (10 children)

Wat? That makes no sense?

"This car is registered to someone else."

"Yes, I'm borrowing it"

"..."

"You must be a criminal?"

[–] thebestaquaman@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Pavement? Path? Footpath? Biking path?

In my language we use the literal translation of "road" also for paved surfaces not meant for cars. We use "walking-road" to emphasise the fact when it's in a place where it might be confused for a car-road. We also have "bike-roads" that are paved/marked like a road but dedicated for bikes only.

I think I just immediately associated "trail" with "hiking trail" or "bike trail" which I associate with more rugged terrain and not paved paths.

[–] thebestaquaman@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

This appears to be a cultural/language thing (I’m not from the Anglosphere), I just didn’t have any concept of a “paved trail”, it immediately seemed like an oxymoron to me.

I've come across trails with priority markings, but in my country most trails don't really have any kind of marked "trail head" at all (apart from the ones very near major cities) like you commonly have in the US.

[–] thebestaquaman@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago (3 children)

This appears to be a cultural/language thing (I'm not from the Anglosphere), I just didn't have any concept of a "paved trail", it immediately seemed like an oxymoron to me.

[–] thebestaquaman@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago (8 children)

Pavement markings

WTH kind of "trails" do you have over there? I thought we were talking about like trails in the woods/mountains, maybe a gravel road at best..?

[–] thebestaquaman@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

I'll only ever say "on your " if I'm moving significantly faster than a person (e.g. I'm biking or running), there's little space, and I have some reason to think they may not be aware that I'm coming up behind them and could move unexpectedly to the side.

[–] thebestaquaman@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

I am a firm believer that anyone that unsuccessfully sues a first aid responder should automatically be sentenced to paying the person double what they sued for. No counter-suit required: A loss just automatically means you have to pay up.

[–] thebestaquaman@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago

There’s a huge difference between a firm hold and chokehold.

So much this! I think it's under-communicated that you have this whole spectrum from "placing hand lightly on neck" to "actual strangulation", and there's a whole lot of fun to be had without getting close to the dangerous side of that spectrum at all.

 

Normally, I use YouTube very little (watch a couple videos a month). However, I've been in bed with an injury for some time now, which has led me to watch quite a bit of YouTube. The thing is, I subscribe to a small handfull of channels that I enjoy content from, but after a relatively short time I had watched pretty much all the new content from those channels.

Now, I would expect that the YouTube algorithm, which is supposedly designed by competent people to get me to stick around, would be able to suggest some decent content to me based on my subscriptions. However, the past week, I've opened YouTube only to find the same old videos being suggested over and over. Even worse: Whenever there's something interesting-looking from a channel I don't recognise, it always turns out to be some shitty AI voice over some generic animations or footage.

I know for a fact that thousands of hours of content are created on YouTube daily, but it genuinely feels like there are maybe five creators out there that are making anything worth watching. It's either that, or the YouTube algorithm is just complete crap at suggesting creators that are in any way similar to what I'm already subscribing to.

What's going on here? Why does it seem like there's no real content out there?

As a "funny" side note: What's with the "aggressively American" AI narrator-voice? I've heard it before, but thought it was some dude until I realised it's the same voice in a bunch of unrelated videos. It reminds me of the Discovery-channel "action-narrator"-voice from back in the day, but now it's showing up in all kinds of crap videos.

 

Inspired by the linked XKCD. Using 60% instead of 50% because that's an easy filter to apply on rottentomatoes.

I'll go first: I think "Sherlock Holmes: A game of Shadows" was awesome, from the plot to the characters ,and especially how they used screen-play to highlight how Sherlocks head works in these absurd ways.

view more: next ›