this post was submitted on 03 May 2026
126 points (98.5% liked)

Technology

84302 readers
4123 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] OpenHammer6677@lemmy.world 60 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

$375 million

That fine's a slap on the wrist with a kiss on the forehead

[–] unitedwithme@lemmy.today 31 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Right?! Meta's valued at 1.5T... So 0.025%

If someone makes $100k, that's an equivalent of a $25 fine.

[–] dan@upvote.au 4 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (2 children)

I get your point, but those are two different values. The first is total value of the company (which you could probably compare to someone's net worth) while the second is yearly income.

Meta's annual profit is $60.46 billion.

[–] AbsolutelyNotAVelociraptor@piefed.social 14 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

So, if maths on a sunday morning don't fail me, for a person making 100k yearly, that's a $625 fine more or less. A slap in the wrist and a kiss in the forehead.

[–] testaccount372920@piefed.zip 6 points 10 hours ago

No no no, a person having 100k left after expenses. They mentioned profit, not revenue. So a really soft, tiny slap on the wrist, barely noticable.

[–] dan@upvote.au 3 points 9 hours ago

Right. I don't disagree with you.

[–] Rothe@piefed.social 2 points 11 hours ago

So 375 million will still only be a slap on the wrist.

[–] toothbrush@lemmy.blahaj.zone 38 points 17 hours ago (4 children)

Those changes include adding age verification for New Mexico users, prohibiting end-to-end encryption for users under 18 and capping their use to 90 hours per month, limiting engagement-boosting features like infinite scroll and autoplay, and requiring Meta to detect 99 percent of new child sexual abuse material (CSAM).

Prohibiting end to end encryption for users under 18 years old, meaning without verified goverment id? Were just going full mask off now, are we?

[–] FaceDeer@fedia.io 18 points 15 hours ago

We must protect the children by removing protections from children!

[–] fluffykittycat@slrpnk.net 5 points 12 hours ago

Yes indeed. That's why I'm not excited about these lawsuits

[–] favoredponcho@lemmy.zip 4 points 13 hours ago

Yeah hate that New Mexico seems to be stupid and tech illiterate about this, meta sucks so when a government fails to punish them in the right way it just gives meta valid ground to stand on in fighting back.

[–] General_Effort@lemmy.world -1 points 7 hours ago

Mask off would mean that you know where they stand. But I can never tell if lemmings are fashy or just idiots. Probably both, I think. They go over the cliff either way.

[–] dan@upvote.au 4 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)
[–] core@leminal.space 6 points 14 hours ago

Thats a rounding error for them