this post was submitted on 04 May 2026
80 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

6696 readers
1509 users here now

Which posts fit here?

Any news that are at least tangentially connected to the technology, social media platforms, informational technologies or tech policy.


Post guidelines

[Opinion] prefixOpinion (op-ed) articles must use [Opinion] prefix before the title.


Rules

1. English onlyTitle and associated content has to be in English.
2. Use original linkPost URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
3. Respectful communicationAll communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. InclusivityEveryone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacksAny kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangentsStay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may applyIf something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.


Companion communities

!globalnews@lemmy.zip
!interestingshare@lemmy.zip


Icon attribution | Banner attribution


If someone is interested in moderating this community, message @brikox@lemmy.zip.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Full Report(PDF).

top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] MNByChoice@midwest.social 2 points 2 hours ago

The kids are gonna be alright.

(Lie to the government and big brother in every way you can without being shot.)

[–] mfed1122@discuss.tchncs.de 16 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

Depressing seeing so many of the parents and children alike saying that they support it when all of them are basically acknowledging that it doesn't even work.

The majority of people truly don't see these laws for what they are, and they just take the name at face value. I can forgive it coming from a 13 year old, lmao, but their parents? Embarrassing

[–] UnfortunateShort@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago

I'm not a parent, but I'm sceptical about anonymity on major social platforms, because enables things that I don't like about these platforms. I favor anonymity*, with the * being the ability of the legal system to break it if necessary, for example using multi-key, asymmetric cryptography.

I know this isn't what's happening here. These are my two cents on how I would totally like to somewhat kill the anonymity for some parts of the internet.

[–] TommySoda@lemmy.world 12 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

It was the strategy of calling it "age verification" as a trojan horse for surveillance. I should be called "identity verification." If people were being told that you needed to verify your identity to watch porn I'm sure the vast majority of people would be against this in an instant.

[–] anna@retrofed.com 8 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Welcome back, 2007, close enough!

[–] rockSlayer@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

I moustache you a question

[–] mfed1122@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

MOO-stache!! 🥸 🦖