this post was submitted on 05 May 2026
88 points (94.9% liked)

Ye Power Trippin' Bastards

1827 readers
44 users here now

This is a community in the spirit of "Am I The Asshole" where people can post their own bans from lemmy or reddit or whatever and get some feedback from others whether the ban was justified or not.

Sometimes one just wants to be able to challenge the arguments some mod made and this could be the place for that.


Posting Guidelines

All posts should follow this basic structure:

  1. Which mods/admins were being Power Tripping Bastards?
  2. What sanction did they impose (e.g. community ban, instance ban, removed comment)?
  3. Provide a screenshot of the relevant modlog entry (don’t de-obfuscate mod names).
  4. Provide a screenshot and explanation of the cause of the sanction (e.g. the post/comment that was removed, or got you banned).
  5. Explain why you think its unfair and how you would like the situation to be remedied.

Rules


Expect to receive feedback about your posts, they might even be negative.

Make sure you follow this instance's code of conduct. In other words we won't allow bellyaching about being sanctioned for hate speech or bigotry.

YPTB matrix channel: For real-time discussions about bastards or to appeal mod actions in YPTB itself.


Some acronyms you might see.


Relevant comms

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Rimu published yet another hit piece against the /0 instance and this time posted it in his own instance comms as well. One of his mods jumped in, admitted they don't know anything about anything, but nevertheless felt confident enough to state their opinion as fact and in the process insult all of us collectively, then stickied his opinion for good measure.

So I decided to reply sarcastically, at which point that mod insulted me and locked the thread, which is apparently a feature in piefed which simply hides/deletes further replies in that thread, but since it's not a feature in lemmy, it appears to function like a shadow delete.

This is what my last reply would have been.

(Yes I'm being snarky, but that "I'm so mature" bullshit just rubs me the wrong way.)

In my opinion, using mod powers to get the last insult in, is just bastard behaviour.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Vicinus@piefed.zip 14 points 1 day ago (3 children)

As an added facit to this PTB discussion, it looks like Rimu deleted the .world post that had a negate score while keeping the piefed.social one up (which has a positive score).

[–] mrdown@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 17 hours ago

I believe the world post was removed by the mod of the community

[–] davel@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Rimu didn’t delete it; a .world mod removed it (finally).

[–] Goferking0@ttrpg.network 5 points 18 hours ago

But didn't do anything about the other thread about it

[–] Grainne@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 1 day ago

Same result, now Rimu can edit the database all he wants to delete critical posts without them going into the mod log.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

do these people have control over the piefed instances ones like they do on lemmy. it is starting to make sense why the staments person account had a disagreement with some of the piefed people/admins, maybe it has something to do with allowing this to go on for so long.

[–] MysticMushroom1776@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

PTB, Rimu has been crashing out big time over this for a while and I don't see it ending well for him. This was all because I called him a Zionist, and I think I was correct because he immediately defended Zionists getting banned from dbzer0.

[–] Aspis@lemy.lol 22 points 1 day ago (7 children)

Hi. Admin of Lemy.lol here.

This does not surprise me. When I joined the Lemy.lol team, I was informed that Rimu had pre-emptively defederated from us sometime ago due to our logo. Pepe the frog. His claim was that it was a symbol of alt-right hatred. There is a debate/discussion to be had around that, especially due to the fact the original creator vehemently stands against the bastardization of his creation, but Rimu refused to engage. His mind had been made up. This situation appears to be no different. He is searching for 'proof' to validate his claim of abuse by the administration team of Dbzer0. I suspect this extends from his similarly rabid reaction over the Lemmy.World admin abuse of Anarchist.nexus and its users.

Learning all of this, as well as his added tools to silence people critical of him, I find it both obscenely hypocritical and obscenely suspicious of his behavior here. This accusation appears to be some level of projection, more so than an actual rational conclusion. As we have all learned recently, people who frequently scream one specific conclusion are often guilty of helping come to this conclusion themselves.

Rimu has already been proven to be using a piefed feature to silence dissenting voices.

What else is he doing with Piefed?

Not merely a PTB, but a dangerous one. The developer of Piefed taking these stances deeply shakes all credibility of Piefed as a platform for myself. It appears to be a rebuilding of reddit from the ground up with Spez as its head. It is for this reason that I have fully recommended for Lemy.lol to not have a Piefed instance. Or, at the very least, not a basic piefed instance. We will gladly wait for a fork that has been sanitized.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] mathemachristian@lemmy.blahaj.zone 28 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

PTB. I'm gonna admit rimu's crashout and meltdown has been quite the spectacle. And running roughshod in the lemmy.world threads knowing he can't do shit or reply back because he banned me without cause has been kinda fun (and probably is the reason he crossposted to a comm that's on less neutral grounds), just sucks it comes at the expense of all you fine folks.

And replying right before locking a thread to make sure one gets the last word is absolute pissbaby behaviour. These people actually think they're being "the adults", confounding.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] codexarcanum@lemmy.dbzer0.com 31 points 1 day ago (99 children)

That "shadow lock" thing sounds like a terrible feature. I'm so annoyed too because I posted a real tear of a rant at that one dude suggesting everyone read Proudhon. Buddy, I have got opinions on that kind of thing.

Real talk here though, wtf is going on? Every day there's some new assault on our instance and every time the thread is dogpiled with crypto-fascists and Zionists.

I've been on the net a very long time. I know what a Nazi infiltration looks like. It looks like the temperature on the board suddenly spiking, with huge arguments constantly breaking out that, somehow, magically, always start to turn towards topics that were "just asking questions" in ways to start etching and eroding the community standards. It starts by claiming everyone doing good moderation is a Zionist or a nazi, so they get kicked out and replaced by actual fascists.

I'm not worried about dbzer0 falling. I'm afraid that piefed already has. It did appear rather quickly, offering a slew of features to get folks off Lemmy. Would it be so strange if a state actor was promoting (and developing) it in order to gradually EEE their way into control here?

[–] MysticMushroom1776@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Would it be so strange if a state actor was promoting (and developing) it in order to gradually EEE their way into control here?

Not at all. Also wouldn't surprise me if the people promoting piefed heavily weren't doing it organically.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 3 points 1 day ago

a state actor would likely spam propaganda as well, or spam alot of triggering posts. it would be quite obvious too.

load more comments (98 replies)
[–] Luminous5481@anarchist.nexus 34 points 1 day ago (1 children)

when I calmly explained that the tool I created did not, in fact, automagically upload a users entire history to ChatGPT, @Rimu@piefed.social just straight up said he wasn't interested in anything I had to say. he would rather stick to the egregious ignorance he displayed in his post than accept that he was wrong. he keeps making new threads about it and getting ratio'd by his own users because he would rather refuse to listen to the literal dozens of people telling him he's making a huge fuss about nothing, than admit he was wrong or overreacted.

of course we've seen how well that's gone for him.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›