db0

joined 2 years ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 27 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (1 children)

I don't understand your logic mate, you put everyone critical of the piefed.social team in the same camp and assigning direct responsibility for anything anyone critical of piefed.social (or piefed itself) does, to all in that camp. It doesn't work that way. People are responsible for their own actions. Yogthos actions do not represent Sunshine. Sunshine's actions do not represent myself, and so on.

As far as "killing the threadiverse" is concerned, all you got to do to stop this is...stop escalating. The more you ban people, especially on flimsy or faulty reasoning, the more they're going to want to talk about it, especially since piefed.social presented itself as an alternative "neutral" instance, making a lot of people migrate their communities and accounts there, and is now taking radical actions disconnecting people from their communities, based on nothing more than vibes.

I can't believe that every day I have to see a new drama thread about piefed or rimu or piefed.social. I can honestly say I've never seen such a level of crash-out before. Do you not see how this works? The more you push people, the more they'll push back.

[–] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (5 children)

That's honestly the only explanation for that build at just 1.5k. More likely they're just a stinking liar 😅

[–] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 44 points 12 hours ago (12 children)

I don't understand the piefed.Social people at all. Are they just making up reality as they go along?

[–] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 13 hours ago (8 children)

32g vram gpu for less than 2k is unlikely. A 4090 itself would be close to 2k

[–] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (1 children)

I guess that says something about the groups/places you're in. Also make sure you're not confusing me with my instance. Sadly a ton of people say db0 when they mean the instance lemmy.dbzer0.com

[–] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 22 hours ago (3 children)

I think I was quite polite to someone calling us liars to our face

[–] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 day ago

Banned admins can still see instance users from the instance that banned them, but in lemmy at least our moderation actions get silently dropped. I don't know if that's true of piefed, but if it is, it means that any malicious users from other instances we handle won't be moderated when viewed by piefed. E.g a spammer's posts would still remain visible on their side

[–] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Not upplaying != downplaying it.

[–] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

What's the significance of using a Jo-Jo reference for this?

[–] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 2 days ago

This stuff is super disheartening

[–] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 2 days ago (1 children)

There is. It's filled to the brim with nazis, cryptobros and spam

 

A random awful.systems user posted the recent disinfo about the FAF using LLMs for moderation. I went in and tried to clarify the situation, and I admit I got kinda upset when they kept ignoring my statements in order to be snarky. Eventually I believed we reached an understanding but I was sadly mistaken which I should have imagine as awful.systems residents kept downvoting all my replies.

As I finished writing a post to explain our official instance policy, I noticed they just jumped to defederation anyway, the reason being...the same disinfo I just went through a lot of effort to debunk. They just called my debunking of the disinfo as "DARVO" which is just disgusting trivialization of harasser behaviour by @dgerard, but I digress.

Anyway I finished my post and once I posted it in our instance, I thought they would at least allow me simply to link to it to provide what we actually believe.

Lol, nope, instant delete and ban

Here's their charming admin casually admitting that even though we explicitly told them this is not what we're doing, they just going to disbelieve and make up their own headcanon.

Anyway, I shouldn't be surprised, dgerard has been known to spread disinfo, so this is just more of the same.

 

Cross-posted from "What ADHD relly feels like" by @ArchsageRamases@lemmy.world in !neurodivergent@discuss.online


 

Rimu published yet another hit piece against the /0 instance and this time posted it in his own instance comms as well. One of his mods jumped in, admitted they don't know anything about anything, but nevertheless felt confident enough to state their opinion as fact and in the process insult all of us collectively, then stickied his opinion for good measure.

So I decided to reply sarcastically, at which point that mod insulted me and locked the thread, which is apparently a feature in piefed which simply hides/deletes further replies in that thread, but since it's not a feature in lemmy, it appears to function like a shadow delete.

This is what my last reply would have been.

(Yes I'm being snarky, but that "I'm so mature" bullshit just rubs me the wrong way.)

In my opinion, using mod powers to get the last insult in, is just bastard behaviour.

 
 

My comment was removed for "misinformation"

https://crazypeople.online/post/18266774

Apparently the mod likes using euphemisms for their extracting wealth from other productive members of society and really dislikes being reminded.

 

The video I linked for reference

I guess I was "sympathizing with invaders" because I said "Such an absolute waste of life, just for the vanity of one man."

Just patently ridiculous moderation...

 
1
ND Memory (piefed.cdn.blahaj.zone)
 

Cross-posted from "Do you agree?" by @LadyButterfly@piefed.blahaj.zone in !autism@lemmy.world


 

It occurs to me, we need an active devops humor comm :D

1
It really is (piefed.cdn.blahaj.zone)
 

Cross-posted from "It really is" by @LadyButterfly@piefed.blahaj.zone in !autism@lemmy.world


1
submitted 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) by db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com to c/games@sh.itjust.works
 
view more: next ›