db0

joined 2 years ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 23 hours ago

We have comms around open-weight and open sourced GenAI tech on our instance. You can start on !stable_diffusion@lemmy.dbzer0.com

[–] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Bring it up in the appropriate comms, it's out of scope for this thread

[–] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 1 day ago

Are you having a stroke?

[–] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 1 day ago (6 children)

Follow the discussions and you'll see unruffled explaining what happened

[–] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 1 day ago (3 children)

I deserved my thread locked because some other unrelated discussion?

[–] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 1 day ago (8 children)
[–] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 23 points 1 day ago

Well the good news is that your reply is still visible from our instance, so at least I get to enjoy it

[–] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 day ago (2 children)

There's some leeway to bring up the post on what triggered the mod action, in order to ground one's position on the mod action, but rehashing the whole arguments is out-of-scope for this comm

[–] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 20 points 1 day ago (10 children)

It's all good. Just grab the pop-corn and enjoy the fireworks :D

[–] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (4 children)

That refers to whether that mod action was relevant, not to rehash any subject. If I got a comment removed from a post about the Gaza genocide, it doesn't mean that YPTB can become a place to rehash the Gaza genocide

[–] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (12 children)

I don't agree with using ChatGPT to summarize people's comments. I think unruffled using ChatGPT to do it was in bad form, but it was still something done ad-hoc by one person, not an instance policy. This is a learning moment, not a betrayal.

Also let's stay on topic please, as per YPTB rules. You can bring up your criticisms in !div0@lemmy.dbzer0.com of our instance moderation in general

 

Rimu published yet another hit piece against the /0 instance and this time posted it in his own instance comms as well. One of his mods jumped in, admitted they don't know anything about anything, but nevertheless felt confident enough to state their opinion as fact and in the process insult all of us collectively, then stickied his opinion for good measure.

So I decided to reply sarcastically, at which point that mod insulted me and locked the thread, which is apparently a feature in piefed which simply hides/deletes further replies in that thread, but since it's not a feature in lemmy, it appears to function like a shadow delete.

This is what my last reply would have been.

(Yes I'm being snarky, but that "I'm so mature" bullshit just rubs me the wrong way.)

In my opinion, using mod powers to get the last insult in, is just bastard behaviour.

 
 

My comment was removed for "misinformation"

https://crazypeople.online/post/18266774

Apparently the mod likes using euphemisms for their extracting wealth from other productive members of society and really dislikes being reminded.

 

The video I linked for reference

I guess I was "sympathizing with invaders" because I said "Such an absolute waste of life, just for the vanity of one man."

Just patently ridiculous moderation...

1
It really is (piefed.cdn.blahaj.zone)
 

Cross-posted from "It really is" by @LadyButterfly@piefed.blahaj.zone in !autism@lemmy.world


1
submitted 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) by db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com to c/games@sh.itjust.works
 
 

Please take a look at the guarantee solicitations page and see if you can guarantee for some instances that you can tell are not spam

The Fediseer relies on crowdsourcing information about the fediverse, so the more of us doing this, the easier it becomes.

 

Cross-posted from "Threativore can now keep your blocklist in sync with your Fediseer censures" by @db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com in !lemmy_integrations@lemmy.dbzer0.com


The new release of Threativore adds Fediseer integration. It will allow you to keep your instance blocklist in sync with your fediseer censures. Not only that but the integration can be as fine-grained as you want, supporting collating multiple instance censures, filtering only censures with tags you want, or only censures collaborated by 1+ other instances etc.

Check out the usage manual for all the variables allowed.

For people who only want some basic protection, the default settings will by default protect you from all CSAM and bigoted instances as tagged by lemmy.dbzer0.com, lemmy.world and lemmings.world. This should provide a good initial blocklist even if you don't populate fediseer yourself Bbut you can of course mix&match according to your needs.

This integration also prevents too many changes happening at one go in your blocklist. If threativore detects too many changes about to happen, it will ask for admin approval via DM before proceeding.

This sync will run every 10 minutes, so if you're following the censures of other instances and they discover a new bad actor, you'll be almost immediately protected, thus converting a fediverse weakness (information distribution) into a strength (information collaboration).

Let me know if you wish to see any improvements.

 

Let's go for 5 and 10 at least!

view more: next ›