this post was submitted on 08 May 2026
484 points (99.2% liked)

Technology

84668 readers
4407 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] kazerniel@lemmy.world 10 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

ugh I host my domains with them, but probably high time I switched away :/

edit: and done! switched to a local host :)

[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago

oh wait..that shitty service that thousands of people complained about is doing something even worse?!

well I'll just boycott them when it's convenient...

[–] vratajin@piefed.social 142 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Less money for middle class and more money for investors owning Nvidia, OpenAI, Anthropic.
Make no mistake about what's happening, that's wealth transfer from the bottom to the top.

[–] maegul@lemmy.ml 49 points 1 week ago (5 children)

And with how this particular AI technology only works by consuming all of the internet’s and our libraries’ data … it’s not just a transfer, it’s pretty much theft.

[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 1 points 6 days ago

Funny, this is the same cloudflare that harasses me every time I open a new tab on certain websites to check that I'm not a bot...

How ironic...

[–] CorrectAlias@piefed.blahaj.zone 19 points 1 week ago

"works" is a bit too strong

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 5 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Not even investors. Majority shareholders/BoD.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] baggachipz@sh.itjust.works 126 points 1 week ago (2 children)

we have to be intentional in how we architect our company for the agentic AI era in order to supercharge the value we deliver to our customers

🤮

The MBAs have won.

[–] billwashere@lemmy.world 63 points 1 week ago (4 children)

JFC, this marketing speak makes me wanna slap someone. I’m not sure how you can so many words and so little.

[–] criss_cross@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago (2 children)

AI is shockingly good at doing just that.

I guarantee a human did not write this.

[–] morriscox@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] systemglitch@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago (2 children)

So little what? SO LITTLE WHAT???

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] badgermurphy@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

What did they win? If that works, they were right and deserved to get their way. If it doesn't, thousands more jobs will disappear as they figure out how they ended up in this metaphorical smoking crater.

If you like spoilers, its going to be the latter.

[–] Scrollone@feddit.it 94 points 1 week ago (18 children)

Every company that fires people for AI is going to regret it so much in the long run...

[–] OwOarchist@pawb.social 66 points 1 week ago

They've already had a spate of serious, unprecedented outages affecting half the internet.

So I guess that means the only place to go from there is to double down, eh?

[–] CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 33 points 1 week ago

the long run...

But....line go up for next quarter right?

load more comments (15 replies)
[–] testaccount789@sh.itjust.works 93 points 1 week ago (5 children)

Employees across the company from engineering to HR to finance to marketing run thousands of AI agent sessions each day to get their work done

Meanwhile the employees:

[–] benjirenji@slrpnk.net 1 points 6 days ago

... or to get all these cupcake recipes. If all that matters not to get fired is active agents...

[–] billwashere@lemmy.world 72 points 1 week ago (3 children)

This is like measuring a carpenter’s work output by how much they use their hammer, not how much gets actually built. I hope every company that does this sorta bullshit goes belly up.

[–] binarytobis@lemmy.world 34 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Using their hammer would be the tools they use to actually code. This is more like measuring a carpenter’s work by how often they get advice from the workers at Home Depot.

[–] dan@upvote.au 9 points 1 week ago

If the company is only measuring token usage and not actual output, it's more like measuring a carpenter's work based on how many hammers they buy.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] black_flag@lemmy.dbzer0.com 21 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It strikes me that it's probably because of all the visibity it offers them into what people are doing and drives them to interact with the chatbot instead of each other. Not everything is about having productive workers. A lot of it is about finding people who are compliant suck ups who won't question the boss no matter what and eliminating anyone with a half a brain cell and an ounce of class solidarity.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] BlackCat@piefed.social 41 points 1 week ago (2 children)

"we have to be intentional in how we architect our company for the agentic AI era in order to supercharge the value we deliver to our customers"

God, I hate corpo-speak so much.

[–] benjirenji@slrpnk.net 2 points 6 days ago

Sounds to me they will be charging more for their services. Or do I need to purposely misunderstand the statement to be useless?

[–] Ophrys@lemmy.dbzer0.com 17 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I recently had to listen to our glorious CEO (who totally isn't a nepo failson) about the company being bought out (so yeah I'm getting fired within 2 years for sure) and it was just him furiously jacking off, thinking he sounded smart with all of his ivy corpo speak.

At a certain point I was like "you know, maybe violence IS the answer"

[–] fubarx@lemmy.world 41 points 1 week ago (5 children)

A bit ironic they offer a service to keep away AI bots from scanning websites, but say AI use is making them so productive they have to lay people off.

So AI bad or good? Getting whiplashed here.

[–] luciferofastora@feddit.org 19 points 1 week ago

keep away AI bots from scanning websites

Specifically: Scrapers operated by individuals rather than big, important companies. On one hand, this significantly cuts down on the volume of scraping. On the other, it restricts control of the AI market to a select class of people who are important enough to get by the bot protection.

The root problem, obviously, is that the "AI market" is generally directed at that select class.

AI bad or good?

AI good. Non-rich people bad.

[–] vodka@feddit.org 9 points 1 week ago

The main selling point of that feature is to charge for access to scraping websites.

They don't care that your website gets scraped, they care about getting paid when someone does it.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] pinball_wizard@lemmy.zip 26 points 1 week ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

That tracks. Cloudflare was probably overdue to make a good solid run at grabbing defeat out of the jaws of success.

Edit: Hijacking this to answer the question on some of our minds:

"What was the name of that open source alternative I was able to ignore while CloudFlare was actually doing their job?"

It's Anubis

[–] anon_8675309@lemmy.world 24 points 1 week ago

34% YoY revenue growth but that isn’t enough! We want your salary also! Raaaaawr

[–] dhcmrlchtdj__@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago

Everyone needs to stop twiddling their thumbs and organize their workplaces.

[–] SunshineJogger@feddit.org 13 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

So much greed.

No wonder most of us give a fuck about our company. Why should I care if I am nothing more than a number that is unfortunately not a robot.

Working could be to just create something good and do so in a community with like minded people. And if it earns enough money to pay everyone's comfortable life needs then that is enough.

That they constantly force growth is just the most toxic bullshit imaginable.

[–] pinball_wizard@lemmy.zip 5 points 6 days ago

Yes. We need more worker owned cooperatives.

[–] SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone 13 points 1 week ago

Ah yes, the elimination of jobs is always good for society.

[–] sirico@feddit.uk 13 points 1 week ago

Brave move after recent years

[–] Danarchy@lemmy.nz 11 points 1 week ago

Jokes on them I’ve been training ai to seize the means of production

[–] vane@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

Useless company with useless services from silicon wankers.

[–] mokey@therock.fraggle-rock.org 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The halting problem is your friend. Have one agent review the work of another agent and then have trade places in an endless loop.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›