this post was submitted on 09 May 2026
147 points (88.5% liked)

Showerthoughts

42736 readers
451 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. The most popular seem to be lighthearted clever little truths, hidden in daily life.

Here are some examples to inspire your own showerthoughts:

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. No politics
    • If your topic is in a grey area, please phrase it to emphasize the fascinating aspects, not the dramatic aspects. You can do this by avoiding overly politicized terms such as "capitalism" and "communism". If you must make comparisons, you can say something is different without saying something is better/worse.
    • A good place for politics is c/politicaldiscussion
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct and the TOS

If you made it this far, showerthoughts is accepting new mods. This community is generally tame so its not a lot of work, but having a few more mods would help reports get addressed a little sooner.

Whats it like to be a mod? Reports just show up as messages in your Lemmy inbox, and if a different mod has already addressed the report, the message goes away and you never worry about it.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Since it's widely accepted that the word "literally" can be used to add emphasis, we need another word that can be used when you want to make it clear that you really mean "literally" in the original sense.

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] CanIFishHere@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 month ago (12 children)

Or just improve your vocabulary.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.cafe 3 points 1 month ago (6 children)

We had a perfectly good word, which people with decent vocabulary used properly, and then people with bad vocabulary ruined it.

Why should those who had a decent vocabulary in the first place improve theirs, instead of the people with the poor vocabulary who ruin the accepted definitions of words improve theirs?

[–] DJKJuicy@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I agree. The word "literally" was literally perfect. It was a binary descriptor. Other people's poor vocabulary ruined it, not the people who used it correctly.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
[–] ptu@sopuli.xyz 4 points 1 month ago
[–] neo2478@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 month ago

Illiteratly

[–] Brkdncr@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] jtrek@startrek.website 4 points 1 month ago

"Exactly". "Truly". "Literally, in the traditional sense not the post modern sense where it means emphatically or figuratively"

[–] njm1314@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I think we just need to be cutting off the fingers of dictionary editors one by one until they turn it back the way it should be.

[–] unmagical@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Dictionary editors don't establish what is valid in English. English communicators do.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Alvaro@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 month ago
[–] Proprietary_Blend@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

"widely accepted' by me and my douche teenage friends

[–] tdawg@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

People just put extra emphasis or say literally literally

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I quite properly literally just wish we didn't have a population that followed illiterate Kardashian misuse of the word.

[–] snooggums@piefed.world 3 points 1 month ago (2 children)

It has been used that way for hundreds of years so we can't blame it on those social parasites.

https://www.merriam-webster.com/grammar/misuse-of-literally

[–] Onomatopoeia@lemmy.cafe 3 points 1 month ago

I only rarely heard it misused before those maroons (and their ilk) popularized the misuse.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] OrteilGenou@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago
[–] DJKJuicy@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Once I found out that that the definition of literally has literally been changed to "literally, but sometimes figuratively", I've switched to objectively and subjectively when describing things, which aren't quite the same but I literally don't have a word anymore that means literally.

So instead of literally you could use objectively. I like that no one is going to use objectively as slang because it's kind of a clunky, obtuse word that doesn't literally roll off the tongue.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Steve@communick.news 3 points 1 month ago
[–] Amnesigenic@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

The correct answer is to make incorrect usage of the word "literally" socially unacceptable. Be fucking mean about it.

[–] EtAl@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

"Literally" used as an intensifier dates back to the 1700s, but the prescriptivist controversy about it is very recent. People can understand that a word can have different meanings and have different uses. Except for prescriptivists, apparently.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] pno2nr@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

While we're at it can we stop giving books and articles entitlements? I feel like being titled should be enough, I don't know why they need to be entitled.

[–] idunnololz@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

frfr /s

I will repeat literally twice to convey i mean actually literally. "No, it's literally literally green".

[–] Onomatopoeia@lemmy.cafe 2 points 1 month ago

Nah, we already have one.

Just because idiots misuse it...

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›