this post was submitted on 13 May 2025
593 points (98.8% liked)

Technology

69999 readers
4707 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] nsrxn@scribe.disroot.org 30 points 22 hours ago (6 children)

nobody is going to want to create new content when they get paid nothing or almost nothing for doing so.

that's a lie

[–] rational_lib@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

People create content knowing others are going to get filthy rich off it and they'll get nothing in return. Except total loss of privacy.

[–] SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world 22 points 21 hours ago

so basically back to internet 1.0, sounds good actually.

[–] AI_toothbrush@lemmy.zip 6 points 20 hours ago

Old youtube was a pretty cool place and nobody got paid

[–] M1ch431@slrpnk.net 3 points 21 hours ago
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] pinball_wizard@lemmy.zip 51 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Letting Google break the law for years with illegal anti-competitive practices is now hurting everyone else's ability to earn money.

I wonder if we have the combined will to do anything about it, or if we will wait and hope the invisible hand of the market will fix it....

[–] InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago

if we will wait and hope the invisible hand of the market will fix it....

Have we lost faith in our handsome businessman? /s

[–] 01189998819991197253@infosec.pub 69 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Don't take this the wrong way, but fuck your business model. The internet was supposed to be open and be ours, and you stole it for profit.

[–] aidan@lemmy.world 33 points 1 day ago (1 children)

To be honest: you can still make your own website, and in many ways big companies are actually making it easier through open-source projects and stuff like Let's Encrypt. The web industry is remarkably open compared to what big companies do in other industries. A lot of the standards meetings and stuff you can just go to and give your opinion. Or ignore the standards and fork it yourself. This alarmism I fear will make people not take the actually alarming things like encryption bans or ID requirements seriously.

[–] T156@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Only for some things, though. If you host your own e-mail these days, chances are, you're going to have a very difficult time sending them anywhere without risking them being deleted, or automatically thrown into spam folders.

[–] aidan@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

True, but sadly that's because of what became a genuine user safety concern

Because, as user sfled pointed out...

The first spam email was sent in 1978

[–] pyre@lemmy.world 18 points 1 day ago (1 children)

also independent of that, fuck cloudflare

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] AllHailTheSheep@sh.itjust.works 20 points 1 day ago (1 children)

maybe their business model. trust me. they'll find a way to monetize the zero click internet too. then it's back to square one

[–] e461h@sh.itjust.works 10 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

I believe this is why tech execs and investors are so hot on pushing AI into everything. They’ll control everyone’s digital experience and you can 100% count on being force fed ads and paid propaganda. Embrace, extend, extinguish

[–] gradual@lemmings.world 5 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Yep. They have direct control over the flow of information.

Honestly, Metal Gear Solid 2 was on fucking point.

And so was 4.

[–] conditional_soup@lemm.ee 1 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (2 children)

I tried playing 2 again recently because I had the same thought, and I had to stop because my wife would not stop laughing at Rose's dialogue. God, I wish Kojima had ever met a woman.

[–] okmko@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (1 children)

And she's 100% justified. The older you get the more appearant it becomes that he's bad at writing dialogue and story. He's a tendency of using controvencies to create drama and it often falls flat, if not into eye-roll territory.

I could not stop cringing during Death Stranding. I had to fast forward the ending. I imagine Margaret Qualley being completely bewildered when they were capturing her character's twin soul melding scene.

[–] conditional_soup@lemm.ee 2 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

I don't necessarily think he's bad at writing dialogue and story, I think he's mostly just bad at writing women. As I've gotten older, I went from taking Metal Gear Solid super seriously to treating it like nuclear/techno Evil Dead

[–] okmko@lemmy.world 2 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

Yeah, we're just less experienced and have fewer expectations when we're young. We were much more impressionable then.

Guys in general are bad at portraying women, as I understand. That's on top of being bad in general for Kojima, I think. There's a funny interview with the MGS2 English translator Agness Kaku where she comments that the writing at times is high school fanfic level.

[–] gradual@lemmings.world 1 points 5 hours ago

What parts of Rose's dialogue made her laugh so much?

I could tell that it was commentary on the lonely and reserved lives that was stereotypical of gamers in the early to mid 2000s. So much of that game was meant to be directed towards the player, I wonder if it fell on deaf ears for her because she's not really the target audience.

[–] ssfckdt@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Can someone check in with the inventor of the web and ask him what the web's business model is?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] nutsack@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

i like to publish content so that bots can scrape it and serve it to people without attribution i think it's good i think ill publish some more interesting stuff right away

[–] 7rokhym@lemmy.ca 12 points 1 day ago

Everyone is too busy doomscrolling TikTok to notice.

[–] wetbeardhairs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 67 points 1 day ago (2 children)

This is all extrapolated from google's self published survey of how their users interact with their search results. Approximately 60% of users don't click anything after a search. Personally I think that is because users have found their results to be seo garbage and not worth clicking on... but that's just my opinion.

[–] Jack_Burton@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Of course they don't click anything. Google search has just become a front-end for Gemini, the answer is "served" up right at the top and most people will just take that for Gospel.

[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago

Even without Gemini, many of my searches are covered by the few word snippets from the top few results. Most of my searches are quick queries with quick answers, usually not me embarking on some huge research effort.

[–] CubeOfCheese@sopuli.xyz 40 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I've watched a lot of students do a search after I tell them to research something, look through a few of the summaries, then look at me in defeat. I have to tell them to actually click some links to try and find an answer

[–] Glitterbomb@lemmy.world 41 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I went to college for networking but the most productive class I've ever had where I learned the most about the internet was instead back in high school. This teacher would make 20 page packets with the most obscure questions like what's the weight of model number 62xRG4 (some obscure car part or something) and he told us to google it. We would spend entire classes just searching for information we would never use, but it drilled into me how to go about finding the information I need. It's been utterly invaluable. Thank you Mr Ward.

[–] cardfire@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 day ago

I love this, so much. Blue Links have been the most critical pass to my future, across my entire life.

Purple links often, too. I can't imagine surrendering the ability to sift through information with my own eyes and hands and brain.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] frog_brawler@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

I didn’t come here for heartwarming stories; yet here I am.

[–] Mubelotix@jlai.lu 108 points 1 day ago (24 children)

Yeah well maybe the web shouldn't be a business

load more comments (24 replies)
[–] Realitaetsverlust@lemmy.zip 42 points 1 day ago (5 children)

Good. Maybe we can go back to paying for our services instead of getting tracked everywhere we go.

[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 21 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

When Orwell predicted universal surveillance he never anticipated that the people themselves would install the cameras, let alone pay a subscription.

[–] gradual@lemmings.world 3 points 22 hours ago

Err... you think you're not being tracked when you spend money?

Wow.

[–] muusemuuse@lemm.ee 51 points 1 day ago (4 children)

That’s not what will happen. We will have to pay AND be tracked. They are not going to give anything up.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] hopesdead@startrek.website 23 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Are they still defending the fact they host Stormfront?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] BradleyUffner@lemmy.world 222 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The Web was much better and more useful back before it had a business model. Good riddance.

[–] Khrux@ttrpg.network 1 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

I have a surprisingly forgiving opinion on AI. There are many cases that I think it's purpose is stupid or defeats the point but it has the potential to cause such a large break to employability and capitalism in general that it has it's upsides.

People are right to take issue with the fact that it is causing people to lose their jobs or be unemployable by no fault of their own, but underlying that issue is the fact that society shouldn't function on the employment being necessary (which I am aware is an opinion).

Even in its absurd energy and water usage, this is largely an issue with how we currently get our energy and water. Having our technocrats suddenly more invested in new and better forms of energy, even just for powering AI has the potential to be a path to better clean energy options.

AI is fundamentally a neutral tool, but as much as it may be sued for evil, it may accelerate flawed economic and environmental systems to a breaking point where a redesign of those structures will be required, which could be the greatest opportunity to implement better structures that we've had since the industrial revolution.

[–] BradleyUffner@lemmy.world 3 points 18 hours ago

I generally agree. My focus was on the "business model" side, where people act like the web exists only to serve business interests. The Web will be just fine, possibly even better, if some of these companies monetizing everything were to fail.

[–] kibiz0r@midwest.social 129 points 1 day ago (9 children)

For a glorious second, the entire world was able to communicate as one.

Then we catalogued every accessible reservoir of culture and knowledge, mined them bare, and refilled them with slop.

A global collective consciousness, hollowed out, replaced with static. No signal. Only noise.

[–] gradual@lemmings.world 2 points 21 hours ago

You know, lemmy feels a lot like the old internet at least in the quality of its users and discussion.

The only problem is the censorship, but that should be ironed out over time as the abusive mods get their communities replaced with better ones.

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›