this post was submitted on 12 May 2026
29 points (100.0% liked)

Australia

5008 readers
88 users here now

A place to discuss Australia and important Australian issues.

Before you post:

If you're posting anything related to:

If you're posting Australian News (not opinion or discussion pieces) post it to Australian News

Rules

This community is run under the rules of aussie.zone. In addition to those rules:

Banner Photo

Congratulations to @Tau@aussie.zone who had the most upvoted submission to our banner photo competition

Recommended and Related Communities

Be sure to check out and subscribe to our related communities on aussie.zone:

Plus other communities for sport and major cities.

https://aussie.zone/communities

Moderation

Since Kbin doesn't show Lemmy Moderators, I'll list them here. Also note that Kbin does not distinguish moderator comments.

Additionally, we have our instance admins: @lodion@aussie.zone and @Nath@aussie.zone

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space 10 points 1 week ago

The “future improvements” should involve gradually rebuilding the line into a high-speed line: straighten out the slowest steam-age curves, replace alignments with new, faster ones, and add electrification (cascading the XPTs as spares to the Melbourne and Brisbane lines, where they’re needed for sleeper services). If you can get it to 200km/h (much faster than the current trains but slower than the current definition of “high-speed rail”) that’s the journey in under 2 hours, competitive with the busy air route. If you can get it to actual HSR speeds, it’ll be a good basis for the eventual line to Melbourne.

And all this can happen while the nation’s generation-defining high-speed-rail project is slowly thrashing out a regional commuter line to Newcastle.

[–] dan@upvote.au 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Is it going to be actual high-speed rail (>200km/h), or just something pretending to be high-speed rail?

[–] psud@aussie.zone 1 points 1 week ago

If it was it would be less than 3 hours not 4 hours

[–] No1@aussie.zone 4 points 1 week ago

Missing from the article:

You can drive it in about 3 hours (depending on traffic).

[–] psud@aussie.zone 3 points 1 week ago

Now it just needs to be faster than cars

[–] Arancello@aussie.zone 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Bringing it on to line with european capabilities of about 1955. For heaven’s sake, its a 325km trip. A train from Japan, anywhere in Europe, China, Pakistan, India could do that trip in an hour. Why does Australia try so hard to shoot itself in the foot.

[–] LemmyTryThisAgain@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Literally! 325km/4hrs = 81kmph. That is slower than the Sydney Canberra Motorway speeds. This is absurd.

[–] nbsp@programming.dev 1 points 1 week ago

noice. its not a lot of coin, but credit where its due.

could line up nicely with the xpt replacements currently in testing (improved comfort and reliability).

no its not new high speed line, we are all going to be well dead before that's up and running, iterative improvements in the mean time is not a bad thing.