this post was submitted on 16 May 2026
465 points (99.4% liked)

Technology

84733 readers
3642 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] JigglySackles@lemmy.world 5 points 18 hours ago

Good. Fuck em. Wish they'd lose even more and more frequently. Along with every other asshole company out there screwing us all.

[–] TransNeko@lemmy.world 5 points 19 hours ago

a company complaining about losing 36b while not paying a living wage is as pathetic as a rich guy bitching about dropping 2 pennies while handing his valet a 5 cent tip after raping the valet's 5 year old daughter.

[–] Tetragrade@leminal.space 7 points 21 hours ago

These greedy fucking CEOs are trashing production on purpose. Take the company off them for efficiency's sake.

[–] FauxLiving@lemmy.world 53 points 1 day ago

In the words of Mario:

[–] zeroConnection@programming.dev 82 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Professor Kwon Seok-joon at Sungkyunkwan University previously estimated that the 18-day walkout alone would cause 10 trillion to 17 trillion won ($17 billion) in direct losses, while JPMorgan has projected total losses of up to 43 trillion won ($28 billion) when factoring in labor costs and extended production disruption.

Nice☺️ Let them suffer even more!

Samsung sent a letter to the union today following the collapse of talks earlier this week, proposing that both sides resume talks without preconditions on Saturday, but union head Choi Seung-ho rejected the overture, telling Korean media that negotiations could take place after June 7, the scheduled end date of the strike.

You had years to make things right, cunts, so you can suffer through 18 days of losses at the very least.

If you weren't such horrible greedy abominations, you could have just given the 28 billion in bonuses. Fucking greedy cunts should pay hundred fold now.

[–] go_go_gadget@lemmy.world 6 points 21 hours ago

It's pretty simple. They can pay workers what they deserve or:

  1. Workers strike until the company is bankrupt.
  2. Workers or other investors buy up factory at a discount
  3. Same workers come back and get the wages they deserve under new company
[–] SigHunter@discuss.tchncs.de 202 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

Ohh, poor corporation, if only there was a way to not make that happen. Oh wait, there is, just pay them good money

[–] osanna@lemmy.vg 111 points 2 days ago (3 children)

you have to wonder how much it would cost to pay their workers a real wage versus taking a $2B!!! a day loss from strikes.

[–] okwhateverdude@lemmy.world 73 points 2 days ago

It is the principle of the matter. They'd rather cut off their own nose to spite their face.

[–] ExcessShiv@lemmy.dbzer0.com 29 points 2 days ago (5 children)

2B/day is temporary one-off cost...higher salary is continuous recurring expense.

[–] nooneescapesthelaw@mander.xyz 1 points 21 hours ago

It's not higher salary that's a big deal, it's the bonus

For reference sk hynix employees are expecting to get 900k next year

[–] Nindelofocho@lemmy.world 31 points 2 days ago (1 children)

More strikes are likely to happen in the future if they dont conceed and even if there are strikes, underpaying your employees can lead to them leaving for better opportunities and you will likely have to replace them at higher cost, lower experience or both.

[–] ExcessShiv@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Of course, but inertia in peoples routines and daily life is also immense. They have definitely made some extensive cost/benefit and risk analysis on this scenario.

[–] Mountainaire@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

Definitely.

[–] SabinStargem@lemmy.today 8 points 1 day ago

Considering that each chaebol owns many industries, that money goes right back into the pockets of Samsung. The chaebols effectively include company stores, with their own versions of KFC, Wendy's, Krogers, Wal-Mart, 7-11, and so forth.

It is that never-ending greed of the rich, that makes them dissatisfied with merely getting most of the money. I suspect that even if they got everything, the executives would demand the flesh of the workers - because 100% isn't enough, it must be MORE.

[–] osanna@lemmy.vg 6 points 2 days ago

yes, but people can always strike again for longer and more often.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TemplaerDude@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 day ago

Holy shit you greedy fucking bastard, would you please spare a thought for the poor shareholders??

[–] TwinTitans@lemmy.world 34 points 1 day ago

Pay your workers. Share the success.

[–] fubarx@lemmy.world 90 points 2 days ago (7 children)

https://www.techspot.com/news/112343-samsung-chip-workers-reject-340000-bonus-sk-hynix.html

For context, Samsung offered the workers a one-time $340K bonus. Workers refused, since their competitor SK-Hynix has annual employee profit-sharing. SK employees are getting $477K bonuses this year, and $900K next year. The 18 day strike will cost Samsung around $250K loss per employee. This likely won't be the last strike.

The disputes are over profits from HBM memory used in AI servers. Expect memory prices to keep going up.

[–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 8 points 21 hours ago

One-time payouts are for suckers. It's not just a payout, it's also agreeing to a new contract.

Never blame workers for demanding more, even if the amount seems high to you. It's not the workers who are fucking us over, it never is. It's the billionaires, the company owners, the top management.

Solidarity!

[–] crystalmerchant@lemmy.world 12 points 2 days ago (3 children)
[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 30 points 2 days ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (1 children)

Quick read of the article and it only shows “$” and not ₩. So I assume that means USD.

That’s a big payout, and it shows how much we’re getting gouged for memory prices.

E: it’s ₩. Jessica found a better article.

[–] Jessica@discuss.tchncs.de 35 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

OP's article sucks. It is all in Won according to this article from Tom's hardware

https://www.tomshardware.com/tech-industry/samsungs-last-ditch-union-talks-collapse-eight-days-before-planned-18-day-chip-factory-strike

Professor Song Heon-jae of the University of Seoul puts the figure higher, projecting losses of approximately 1 trillion won ($700 million) per day from factory shutdowns, Seoul Economic Daily reported on April 26.

So Samsung offered like $225 USD for a one time bonus to these employees. No wonder they're striking

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Ah, that makes more sense. $225 is minimal for a “bonus” payout. Thanks for finding a better source.

[–] Jessica@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Why would a company in Korea be paying Koreans in American currency?

[–] Zagorath@quokk.au 3 points 1 day ago

It wouldn’t, but translating to the currency of the reader is very commonplace.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Th4tGuyII@fedia.io 76 points 2 days ago (1 children)

According to the Seoul Economic Daily, daily losses could approach 3 trillion won ($2 billion) if fabrication lines are paused entirely. Professor Kwon Seok-joon at Sungkyunkwan University previously estimated that the 18-day walkout alone would cause 10 trillion to 17 trillion won ($17 billion) in direct losses, while JPMorgan has projected total losses of up to 43 trillion won ($28 billion) when factoring in labor costs and extended production disruption.

Wow. What a huge amount of money to lose just because you won't pay your highly skilled workers more.

As @osanna@lemmy.vg said, you really have to wonder how much it would cost Samsung to pay their workers more if they're willing to tank a potentially $20-40 billion loss instead of giving the union what they're asking for.

[–] Flower@sh.itjust.works 60 points 2 days ago (2 children)

At that point, it's purely ideology and contempt for anyone beneath them.

[–] Th4tGuyII@fedia.io 11 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Probably - because the amount of money they're about to lose was probably less than what actually negotiating with the union would've cost them

[–] MagicShel@lemmy.zip 21 points 2 days ago (1 children)

How many people do your think they employ? Because I performed seconds of painstaking research and came up with 80k, so I divided $40B by 80k employees and I get $500k/worker.

They could afford to give everyone a 25k raise and it would be 20 years before it cost them a dime.

That doesn't seem like a smart business decision.

[–] Th4tGuyII@fedia.io 15 points 2 days ago

By that calculation, even on the lower end of only losing $20 billion that'd still be 10 years before it'd cost them anymore than this rancid business decision did.

They're so determined to not negotiate with the union that they'd rather throw away the shareholder's money than give it to workers... And that's just this scheduled strike. If talks fail again, I bet you there will be more to come.

Samsung might have a difficult time explaining that one at their shareholder presentation next year.

[–] Flower@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 days ago

It's in practice a class based society with the big families at the top like ancient nobility. Seems they're having a little "let them eat cake" moment.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Jimbo@pawb.social 45 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Wild that when it comes to a strike, it's always cheaper to just concede and companies never do. Ever.

[–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 8 points 2 days ago

Not cheaper in the long term always. Unfortunately it might still be cheaper for them to let it ride out.

[–] bunnydog@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 day ago

Wow so what does this mean for foxconn? Will they rise in chip manufacturing? This is gonna probably change regions of better chip makers as foxconn was the lead in the market. Now apple is working on a ai chip for their next release. Not good Samsung as you were the lead for new better chips I wonder where you gonna go for the next chip manufacturing.

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)

How could daily losses hit $2B when their company-wide yearly revenue is $25B

[–] MrShankles@reddthat.com 4 points 1 day ago

Seems like the strike could cause "break-even" revenue in 12.5 days

[–] Bullerfar@lemmy.world 12 points 2 days ago (5 children)

Samsung should start making their own OS or google will probably kill their phone brand over time.

[–] twisted@sh.itjust.works 15 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Looks like they are doing it themselves.

[–] Bullerfar@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

True. I am leaving their platform. It's just sad, since they made excellent products.

[–] hexagonwin@lemmy.today 6 points 1 day ago

they attempted twice and fucked up both lol

[–] woelkchen@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago (7 children)
load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›