this post was submitted on 19 May 2026
151 points (96.9% liked)

Technology

84796 readers
4301 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://piefed.world/c/tech/p/1135683/x-announces-significant-restrictions-to-free-accounts-50-posts-and-200-replies-per-day

  • Direct Messages (daily): The limit is 500 messages sent per day.
  • Posts: 50 original posts and 200 replies per day for unverified accounts. The daily update limit is further broken down into smaller limits for semi-hourly intervals.
  • Changes to account email: 4 per hour.
  • Following (daily): The technical follow limit is 400 per day. Please note that this is a technical account limit only, and there are additional rules prohibiting aggressive following behavior.
  • Following (account-based): Once an account is following 5,000 other accounts, additional follow attempts are limited by account-specific ratios.
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] thedormantotaku@lemmy.world 6 points 4 hours ago

Mastodon doesn't have these limits.

[–] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 36 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

If these restrictions are significant, please seek therapy

[–] MyVeryRealName@lemmy.world 2 points 5 hours ago

I guess it's for customer care

[–] Mwa@thelemmy.club 3 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

Good, will make people get off Xwitter.

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 12 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Does anyone actually reach those numbers? Is this a crackdown on bots?

[–] krisevol@lemmus.org 1 points 1 hour ago

Most people won't hit those numbers, and this that so should probably be paying for the service

[–] DioramaOfShit@lemmy.world 72 points 18 hours ago (3 children)

50 posts a day!? If you hit 50 posts a day they should just ban you.

[–] kbobabob@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 7 hours ago

Don't a lot of people cover live events, city hearings, court room proceedings, war zones, etc?

[–] nothingcorporate@lemmy.today 11 points 13 hours ago

The point is to make bot farms create thousands of new accounts, driving up user accounts so they can trick investors and advertisers into thinking they still have a viable business.

[–] morrowind@lemmy.ml 20 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

"significant restrictions"

I wonder if author is a twitter addict

[–] urushitan@kakera.kintsugi.moe 4 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (1 children)

https://xcancel.com/htxtafrica

At least as far as sharing every article on their site there, yes. Almost 50k tweets

[–] morrowind@lemmy.ml 3 points 12 hours ago

Eh that doesn't count. It's probably automated anyway.

[–] otter@lemmy.ca 62 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

This is enshitification, but it might be indirectly helping people who are on Twitter too much 😄

It doesn't do much to bot farms since they can keep spinning up more accounts

[–] FriendOfDeSoto@startrek.website 19 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

I would argue you cannot enshitify a service that was already shit. At this point this is more of a conshitidation.

[–] Zagorath@quokk.au 4 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Enshittification doesn't mean "making a good system bad". It's a specific process whereby the user experience of a platform is degraded in order to benefit the business partners. Then even the business partners are ripped off to benefit the platform owners.

[–] FriendOfDeSoto@startrek.website 2 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

If you want to get picky, Xwitter didn't enshitify as laid out as a concept by Cory Doctorow. The best example is probably Amazon which went from being insanely user friendly to lock in users, to supplier-friendly and increasingly less so for users, until it had squeezed and shafted both groups. That's enshitification and it doesn't apply to Xwitter. They had problems to make money before a certain somebody bought it. They've been bleeding users since the eventually Nazi saluting manbaby bought it, who then wanted to sue advertisers who refused to buy ads on his service. There was no user lock-in and then a supplier lock-in. There was just shit. All their current problems are man made. By one specific man.

[–] Darnton@piefed.zip 1 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Just because it is caused by one man doesn't mean it isn't entshittification.

[–] FriendOfDeSoto@startrek.website 1 points 7 hours ago

Yeah but it isn't here.

[–] AmbitiousProcess@piefed.social 3 points 15 hours ago

I never thought I'd like using a word more than enshittification, but conshitidation takes the cake, I think.

[–] bufalo1973@piefed.social 1 points 8 hours ago

Another wave in the making.

[–] kurmudgeon@lemmy.world 39 points 19 hours ago (3 children)

Why the fuck do people still use Twitter? Why would you pay to use social media? You're already the product, and now you're going to pay to be the fucking product? Are you stupid?

[–] radiofreebc@lemmy.world 15 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Have you met people lately?

[–] dbtng@eviltoast.org 9 points 17 hours ago

Yes I have. It was not good.

[–] mynameisbob@lemmy.ml 2 points 14 hours ago

hey now the gipity gonna save us all. It is the greatest invention ever. 🤤

[–] Iconoclast@feddit.uk -1 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

Multiple reasons, but I'd be lying if I claimed it's not partly out of spite for all the people who get hilariously angry about it. I'm also subscribed to SuperGrok.

Imagine getting angry because other people do things you don't like, even though it doesn't affect you in any way whatsoever. Stop hitting yourself.

[–] lost_faith@lemmy.ca 1 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

even though it doesn’t affect you in any way whatsoever

Nope, doesn't affect me at all... oh, wait, I can no longer afford a platter drive or ssd to expand storage, I can no longer afford ram, cpus, soon to be pcbs. Nope, doesn't affect anyone anywhere at all.

Recently bought a 1tb m.2 for a friend, it cost more than the 2tb I bought in december

[–] Iconoclast@feddit.uk 1 points 4 hours ago

Well people using twitter surely aren't to blame for that which is what I was responding to here.

People using LLMs do drive up the demand for computer components, I'll give you that, though even there it's a bit more nuanced than that.

[–] Darnton@piefed.zip 1 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

You: "I turned fascist just to spite people who gets hilariously angry about fascism".

[–] Iconoclast@feddit.uk 1 points 5 hours ago

That same logic makes you a communist then. And me a communist fascist I guess? Go figure.. Difficult to keep up with the insane troll logic you're displaying here.

[–] OldQWERTYbastard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Since 2007 or so, I haven't seen a good use case for Xitter other than situations where mass messaging is necessary. Like a utility company announcing maintenance or outages. Why do people care so much about what other people think?

My dear mother taught me that opinions are like assholes. Everybody has one and they all stink.

Wise woman.

[–] IronBird@lemmy.world 2 points 12 hours ago

this saying doesnt apply universally, what about people into butt stuff that regularly bleach their assholes you tear into that after a good bleaching/shower (and enema, if you want to be safe), it's fine

[–] FriendOfDeSoto@startrek.website 14 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Oh, man, this will affect tens of people.

[–] oyzmo@piefed.social 3 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Do real people use this? Though it was just bots and trolls...

[–] Iconoclast@feddit.uk 1 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Are trolls not real people?

[–] oyzmo@piefed.social 2 points 6 hours ago

hardly.. 😂

[–] realitista@lemmus.org 13 points 18 hours ago (3 children)

Its so hard for me to believe that there are people out there for whom this will be an issue. Who are these people and what's wrong with them?

[–] Iconoclast@feddit.uk 2 points 9 hours ago

I consider myself quite active on Lemmy yet I still only average 12 comments and half a post per day. For all I know, Lemmy could have these same limits and I'd never even find out about it.

[–] TheFogan@programming.dev 4 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

My thoughts also... who the hell posts more than 50 times a day... well that's twitter isn't probably paid for with our tax dollars anyway.

[–] urushitan@kakera.kintsugi.moe 2 points 13 hours ago

Pretty much anyone whose username ends in .eth or begins with a dollar sign or has a crypto address in their bio, but the vast majority of those people already pay for that blue checkmark anyway

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 11 points 18 hours ago

Oh, no!

Anyway...

[–] Chozo@fedia.io 9 points 18 hours ago

Oh no! The nazi bar has set a drink limit! Guess I'll just have to continue not drinking there.

[–] dmtalon@infosec.pub 8 points 18 hours ago

That means I'll end each day having only 50 posts remaining...

Even when I had an account years ago there was not a single day I posted/replied/commented/shared more than 1-3 times a day (1-3 interactions a day)

It was never my thing really so it was easy to remove from my life.

[–] Bebopalouie@lemmy.ca 7 points 18 hours ago

Who cares. Piece of shit platform.

[–] nucleative@lemmy.world 5 points 17 hours ago

The upside of Twitter's downfall has been the absence of "look what so and so said in a tweet" headlines.

[–] mechoman444@lemmy.world 3 points 15 hours ago

I'm happy to say that the only time I've ever even been on twitter was to check down times on destiny 2 servers which at the time was literally the only place they'd post stuff like that... Nobody knows why... But then again it's bungie... So...

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 5 points 18 hours ago (5 children)

Let me get this straight.....

Elon musk buys twitter for 44 BILLION dollars with the expectation that it will help be influencial towards societies general conversation.

So then he starts turning twitter into a right wing cesspool, and some users start leaving. Granted, not nearly enough. I think I read about 30% of the site has left, but thats still far too many who haven't left.

So despite his stupidity, he still has a sizeable platform. And his thought process is......"hey, you know those influencial voices we have on society? Lets limit those!"

So now they are reducing the amount of messages their users can put out into the world.

..........so what is even the goal here? Are they just doing things to stay in the news?

[–] The_Decryptor@aussie.zone 2 points 15 hours ago

It's because he's an idiot.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] warmaster@lemmy.world 4 points 17 hours ago

This is great! We need more enshittification on X!

load more comments
view more: next ›