Well, the bar has been set pretty low.
Asklemmy
A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions
If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!
- Open-ended question
- Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
- Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
- Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
- An actual topic of discussion
Looking for support?
Looking for a community?
- Lemmyverse: community search
- sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
- !lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities
~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~
“well that explains it” would probably be a common reaction
also 75% of your first paragraph is parenthetical

I feel like we would know before any story broke.
his or her
There’s a less awkward word for this, y’know?
(checks American voting patterns)
Unfortunately, that word would be "his".
Yeah, it’d be less awkward if op just assumed there’s no possibility of a woman being elected president in America. 
I have a feeling that at least some high ranking government officials, worldwide, are probably already doing this
unfortunately
All this so-called-AI generated policy meat still needs to go through the sausage grinder in both houses, filled with humans. So I think the scandal wouldn't be as great.
Depends on how good the AI was, surely? An LLM would be shocking, but something actually designed for policy work might be worthwhile.
We don't have enough structured data in this domain to be able to use anything other than LLMs. At least, not in the timeframe of OP's hypothetical.
It’s likely to be an LLM, because current benchmarks show that LLMs have made significant improvements, they can even solve some of Erdős’s problems or help solve them to some extent. By 2028, LLMs could do more or better understand the problems.
However, it will also depend on what kind of policies that LLM influenced, because if they were negative policies, there will be public backlash. On the other hand, if they were positive policies, there will be debates about whether politicians should use LLMs to choose the best course of action, or whether some will suggest replacing human politicians with LLM politicians.
They would probably ignore all other prompts and give me a recipe for cookies.
I just hope that LLM isn't Grok, because that would cause its popularity to plummet, and its party would be affected as well.