this post was submitted on 20 May 2026
712 points (99.0% liked)

Games

48521 readers
2122 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Rules

1. Submissions have to be related to games

Video games, tabletop, or otherwise. Posts not related to games will be deleted.

This community is focused on games, of all kinds. Any news item or discussion should be related to gaming in some way.

2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

No bigotry, hardline stance. Try not to get too heated when entering into a discussion or debate.

We are here to talk and discuss about one of our passions, not fight or be exposed to hate. Posts or responses that are hateful will be deleted to keep the atmosphere good. If repeatedly violated, not only will the comment be deleted but a ban will be handed out as well. We judge each case individually.

3. No excessive self-promotion

Try to keep it to 10% self-promotion / 90% other stuff in your post history.

This is to prevent people from posting for the sole purpose of promoting their own website or social media account.

4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

This community is mostly for discussion and news. Remember to search for the thing you're submitting before posting to see if it's already been posted.

We want to keep the quality of posts high. Therefore, memes, funny videos, low-effort posts and reposts are not allowed. We prohibit giveaways because we cannot be sure that the person holding the giveaway will actually do what they promise.

5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

Make sure to mark your stuff or it may be removed.

No one wants to be spoiled. Therefore, always mark spoilers. Similarly mark NSFW, in case anyone is browsing in a public space or at work.

6. No linking to piracy

Don't share it here, there are other places to find it. Discussion of piracy is fine.

We don't want us moderators or the admins of lemmy.world to get in trouble for linking to piracy. Therefore, any link to piracy will be removed. Discussion of it is of course allowed.

Authorized Regular Threads

Related communities

PM a mod to add your own

Video games

Generic

Help and suggestions

By platform

By type

By games

Language specific

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Authorities brought 20 police cars, five SWAT officers, and drones to her house

https://www.twitch.tv/grammacrackers/clip/CharmingSolidNoodleKevinTurtle-CCpMMy7EX_W4v7_S

update: Found this video from local news https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OGeb3cuqLxE

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 17 points 1 hour ago

Just here to point out that it's not normal for a military response to some rando calling in a hit on someone's house.

A normal response is a check by a single police car with two officers. One to knock on the door and ask questions. The other to remain with the vehicle to call in any issues.

This is a police state.

[–] Mulligrubs@lemmy.world 1 points 25 minutes ago* (last edited 21 minutes ago)

Another side benefit to The Drug War, the gift that keeps on giving.

Hundreds of thousands of people are sitting in jails and prisons right now for using. Over three hundred thousand on any given day.

https://www.prisonpolicy.org/graphs/pie2026_drugs.html

This holdover from the Nixon era gets a little worse every year. Why do we have TWENTY cars available for any random prank caller?

Are we safe yet?

[–] SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world 14 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Your title leaves out the part about her being swatted. Who knows what the scammer told the police.

[–] Crozekiel@lemmy.zip 9 points 2 hours ago

The news story linked said that the scammer told the police she was shot and killed.

[–] kamen@lemmy.world 11 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Very good use of the US taxpayers' money.

/s if not obvious

[–] But_my_mom_says_im_cool@lemmy.world 2 points 47 minutes ago

This keeps the military spending going. You sell last years models to the cops and you can use taxpayer money to buy new toys while people starve

[–] flop_leash_973@lemmy.world 75 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (1 children)

Takes a special kind of asshole to swat a little old lady for trying to host a wholesome gaming stream for a good cause.

[–] chuckleslord@lemmy.world 61 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

The fact that swating still happens just proves how much of a joke policing is in general. The fact that you can get a bunch of gun-wielding adrenaline junkies to show up somewhere, frothing at the mouth for violence, in the most spurious of ways is a damning indictment for the whole institution.

[–] SabinStargem@lemmy.today 3 points 59 minutes ago

I still believe that "defund the police", is the correct choice. The whole damn thing has to go.

[–] end_stage_ligma@lemmy.world 21 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Yet they won't do a damn thing if someone is actually assaulting you.

[–] 1984@lemmy.today 5 points 1 hour ago

Probably shoot you and the aggressor since keeping themselves safe is the priority in their training.

[–] rustydrd@sh.itjust.works 66 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (3 children)

Kudos to granny for being so positive about it and acknowledging that the cops have to follow up on the calls they receive, but if some anonymous tipster can bring down a SWAT team on some grandma's house without any kind of check being triggered, that might indicate that there are some problems about how these issues are being handled. Other people may get out of this with much worse than a funny story to tell when two dozen cops decide to visit their house at night.

[–] Duamerthrax@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago

They need to respond, but they need to end the whole "Killology" mindset that American cops are trained into.

[–] JcbAzPx@lemmy.world 24 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

People have already died from swatting. Faster and cheaper than hiring an assassin.

[–] 1984@lemmy.today 3 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

Once I read they threw a flashbang through the window and it landed in a baby bed with a baby inside, and went off.

Things we don't want to know...

[–] Skyrmir@lemmy.world 6 points 3 hours ago

From the point of contact, or including time to find a good one? A good assassin can be very quick.

I'll give ya cheaper though. Good work costs good money.

[–] SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

Yah, send a car around first to at least glance, maybe try calling them too.

[–] biggerbogboy@sh.itjust.works 44 points 6 hours ago

And these police organisations keep spouting “but we need more funds, to protect the community”

No, you fucking dont, you’re wasting your resources by attempting to uphold your strict quotas rather than actually serve and protect the community.

[–] zeroConnection@programming.dev 14 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (2 children)

TLDW; Also, fuck YouTube ads. Can I read about this somewhere?

[–] deltapi@lemmy.world 4 points 2 hours ago

Get revanced. Works on stock devices, no root needed.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 6 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Tell me about it. Wish this wasn't considered a legitimate source of news. But that would require a mainstream outlet to cover it.

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 10 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Even a blogger. I like to read. I don't waste my time with videos that I can't reliably skim to get to the real information and skip over garbage.

[–] Mulligrubs@lemmy.world 1 points 16 minutes ago

Videos take 10x longer and often aren't worth it

[–] blindbunny@lemmy.ml 29 points 6 hours ago (2 children)
[–] JennaR8r@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 hours ago

Assigned Cop At Birth

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] atrielienz@lemmy.world 17 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

Just curious about why she was raided. What did the warrant say?

[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 42 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

Turns out, it's relatively easy to convince the police to bring in a swat team to someone's house, and the police are so chomping at the bit to get out the big boy toys that they don't even question the validity of the call.

They might say it's a hostage situation, or gunplay, whatever it takes to make action happen without any real question.

[–] Hettyc_Tracyn@lemmy.zip 11 points 4 hours ago (3 children)

Well, if they send someone to look, and it is an actual bad situation, then response time is delayed…

Of course, as soon as it is seen to be a false call, the person who did the call should be arrested as that’s illegal

[–] luciferofastora@feddit.org 3 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

Of course, as soon as it is seen to be a false call, the person who did the call should be arrested as that’s illegal

Proving beyond reasonable doubt that they weren't genuinely concerned can be tough, and mistakenly calling the police (or emergency services in general) shouldn't generally be punished or people will hesitate to call for help when they need it.

But you're right: there should be some recourse to abuse, if not criminal then civil. Of course, a lawsuit is a lot of work and possibly money you would pay up front, and there's no guarantee that you'd actually see much money if the perpetrator is a basement-dwelling neet whose meagre pocket money is immediately spent on Gacha games, trading cards or those weird plastic figures with oversized heads that some people go crazy over.

So maybe the state / police should instead pay compensation to the victim and, if it seems like a case of abuse, bring their own suit to potentially recover those damages from the caller. That would reduce the damage of mistakes, protect well-meaning callers from retribution and thus shift the cost for this security from the individual to the collective. It also allows an option to shift it back onto malicious individuals.

Of course, the police response could be more measured too, and the whole thing is contingent on the justice of the judicial system, but the latter part is true of any system and the former applies to many things the police do anyway.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] atrielienz@lemmy.world 23 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

I didn't watch the video (I never do, I want to read). So I assumed there was a warrant, when in fact there does not appear to have been time for that.

Police received a report of an active shooter with one shooting casualty. That is what prompted the response and that's all I wanted to know.

The fact that the response happened isn't something I personally think should be left up to the police (they shouldn't be allowed to decide which calls are valid). The fact that this was obviously an overreaction on the part of the police (that so many cops showed up) is still ridiculous in my view.

What I really want is for there to be an investigation into who made the report and preferably for the book to be thrown at them.

I don't disagree with you that this was a ridiculous display of force. But your answer didn't answer my question.

[–] DrMorose@lemmy.world 6 points 4 hours ago

For exigent circumstances like an active shooter or hostage situation they do not need a warrant to roll up. That is what makes these kind of issues so concerning. SWATTING has been going on since streaming became more main stay for any reason or no reason at all. Anyone can do it and repercussions on the caller are almost none existent so it is seen as a "fun" way to cause mayhem.

[–] mechoman444@lemmy.world 11 points 4 hours ago (3 children)

You ever watch Police academy? You remember Tackleberry? That's basically the United States police.

[–] HiTekRedNek@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

Oh Eugene...

[–] Digestive_Biscuit@feddit.uk 1 points 2 hours ago

That made me laugh. Big gun virgin.

[–] atrielienz@lemmy.world 3 points 3 hours ago

This also does nothing to answer my question. I share your opinion up to a point, but I think you missed something here. I was simply looking for factual information about the event.

[–] jaybone@lemmy.zip 23 points 6 hours ago

Just a few days ago there was a meme of her going around. Guess some asshole saw it.

load more comments
view more: next ›