this post was submitted on 25 May 2026
911 points (99.0% liked)

A Boring Dystopia

16775 readers
767 users here now

Pictures, Videos, Articles showing just how boring it is to live in a dystopic society, or with signs of a dystopic society.

Rules (Subject to Change)

--Be a Decent Human Being

--Posting news articles: include the source name and exact title from article in your post title

--If a picture is just a screenshot of an article, link the article

--If a video's content isn't clear from title, write a short summary so people know what it's about.

--Posts must have something to do with the topic

--Zero tolerance for Racism/Sexism/Ableism/etc.

--No NSFW content

--Abide by the rules of lemmy.world

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 27 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] j_overgrens@feddit.nl 24 points 1 day ago (4 children)

I am 100% on board with hating Data Centres. But for those who don't know: a unevenly distributed variable load on the grid (EV charging) is a much bigger challenge than a localised somewhat constant load on the grid (Data Centres).

Still: should we build Data Centres with the power use comparable to that of small countries? Fuck no.

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 8 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

EV charging is also not that big

  • A typical level 2 charger is 50a@240v, similar to an electric range that many people have.
  • It’s also a single digit percentage increase in a home’s typical use
  • a full transition will take two decades - surely we can adjust the grid as needed over two decades

I read an estimate that full electrification, not just EVs, was projected to increase electrical load 1%/year ….. I don’t remember the data center equivalent but it was several times that

[–] TBi@lemmy.world 3 points 20 hours ago

Yes BUT if everyone changed today the grid would break. So we can’t change!

/s

[–] DannyMac@sh.itjust.works 4 points 23 hours ago

Not to mention, I feel like this argument is based on everyone switching to EVs overnight. This could never happen unless someone has a magic lamp with genie, but I would hope the genie would address the power grid issues as part of the wish. Now a monkey's paw, on the other hand...

[–] Jason2357@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 day ago (2 children)

EVs are a highly modifyable variable load, as the vast majority personal vehicles sit idle nearly the whole day. When a fraction of those can be directed to charge based on grid needs, it becomes a net-asset for stability.

In Ontario, just the half-assed time-of-use pricing and small numbers of EVs in the fleet are likely contributing to the more more stable load over night. They used to have so much Nuclear surplus they were selling to NYC overnight at negative pricing on a regular basis.

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 3 points 22 hours ago

My smart thermostat already has a capability of letting the power company make adjustments as needed to stabilize the grid. Is it really so hard to imagine the same functionality for EV charging?

Sometimes override the thermostat, because my house needs to be comfortable for occupants. But I can plug in my EV when I get home, and it has 12 hours to charge. On a typical day it might need two hours and I have no reason to care as long as it completes by morning

[–] Omgpwnies@lemmy.world 1 points 20 hours ago

Also, home batteries and battery storage at public chargers can dampen the "shock" that the grid might face since it'll deliver power from the local storage that will then recharge at a constant rate from the grid

[–] Kushan@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

And just so we're really on the same page, just because something is a challenge doesn't mean it's a bad thing or shouldn't be done.

It's not like we didn't have the same problems with balancing the grid when people started installing electric ovens or Aircon or dishwashers or washing machines or pretty much any other heavy appliance you can think of.

In fact, did you know that if you were to install Solar and export production to the grid, that can cause the same problems? A lot of people seem to think that it's about how much power the grid can produce alone but there's a reason it's referred to as a "balance", too much input causes problems as well. Utilities need to plan energy production in advance to cope with an already variable demand, there are people who's entire job is predicting spikes and drops on consumption so they can figure out if they need to spin up or shut down entire power plants - both of which are expensive to do and any mistake will mean brownouts or worse, a collapsed grid. This isn't a new thing, it has been this way for decades.

If anything, EVs and EV chargers can be made a lot smarter than the above to actually help balance the grid.

My electric provider gives me cheap electric and a discount on my bill if I let them decide when the car charges (via controlling the car charger). I just tell them when I need the car to be fully charged by and they handle the scheduling. Do I care if the car charges at 2am instead of 9pm if it's fully charged by 7am either way? Absolutely not.

Better yet, V2X is starting to become a thing - this enables bi-directional charging for the EV. In other words, the EV itself actually helps balance the grid rather than just be a pure drag on it.

In the modern age, overall grid capacity is only a small part of the problem, what we need is a smarter grid. A smarter grid will cope with spikes in demand without forward planning and being cheaper overall for everyone.

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 17 points 1 day ago

Just wait until they cut off households during the heat of summer because they need more power to cool the AI silicon...

[–] 9point6@lemmy.world 70 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Electric cars free people from a finite resource controlled by a few

AI data centres are intended to hook people on a new, artificially created, resource, controlled by a few

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Pretty sure electric car batteries rely on finite resources, too. Further, I'm pretty sure all resources are finite, which is why people fight so hard to control those resources for personal gain.

[–] 9point6@lemmy.world 22 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Okay I guess finite, disposable resources, then

You can recycle batteries, you can't use petrol twice

[–] MyVeryRealName@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Then the problem isn't the centre but the control.

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 53 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Creating a slave class for the capital class is always seen as essential to the capital class which owns the majority of the country.

It's just like we can't do anything politically because it might "impact or reduce jobs" but if corporations want to do something that will net them profit and reduces jobs by the thousands, it's literally not even a question, just let them do it.

Corporations don't have the same rights as people, they clearly have more rights than people.

[–] harmbugler@piefed.social 4 points 1 day ago

Interesting to see what Hawai'i is doing combating Citizens United by reducing the powers it grants corporations.

And let's not just tax billionaires the right amount, let's tax them so much they leave.

[–] morrowind@lemmy.ml 20 points 1 day ago

I mean it literally can't handle data centers either. That's why they're running gas turbines and restarting nuclear reactors.

The advantage is it's a few spots instead of the whole country

[–] testfactor@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago (3 children)

To be fair, AI data center hate seems to be pretty bipartisan.

I suspect that the only people supporting them are simply on the take.

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 1 points 22 hours ago

It’s the out of control growth, instant need, exempting themselves from pollution and noise controls, lack of respect for existing resources ….. it’s the way and the speed datacenters for LLMs are being pushed.

Datacenters are an important part of modern society but they are also high impact on the local economy so need to be planned accordingly.

To be fair, AI data center hate seems to be pretty bipartisan.

Yet so is support for it from politicians.

I suspect that the only people supporting them are simply on the take

Bingo.

[–] Horsey@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Same with Ukraine support: Putin’s bullshit machine convinced idiots and their reps and now we’re half against Ukraine.

Any politician who can't, can be replaced by one who can. That door swings both ways.