I would completely be fine with this app sending a hacking attempt in the direction of those glasses. If it can remotely brick those glasses, I'd be 100% fine with that. Hell, I'd install it myself
Fuck this garbage
this post was submitted on 26 May 2026
191 points (96.6% liked)
Privacy
50695 readers
786 users here now
A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.
Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.
In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.
Some Rules
- Posting a link to a website containing tracking isn't great, if contents of the website are behind a paywall maybe copy them into the post
- Don't promote proprietary software
- Try to keep things on topic
- If you have a question, please try searching for previous discussions, maybe it has already been answered
- Reposts are fine, but should have at least a couple of weeks in between so that the post can reach a new audience
- Be nice :)
Related communities
much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)
founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
... No releases?
APK now available! 🎉 github.com/getnopeek/nopeek-android/releases
Download app-debug.apk — no build needed. Works on Android 8.0+
You can build from source with Android Studio.
The link to the APK seemingly is broken so that leaves just building from source, which it has instructions for.
So... No releases.
APK now available! 🎉 github.com/getnopeek/nopeek-android/releases
Download app-debug.apk — no build needed. Works on Android 8.0+
APK now available! 🎉 github.com/getnopeek/nopeek-android/releases
Download app-debug.apk — no build needed. Works on Android 8.0+
How does it differ from Nearby Glasses, apart from detecting more AR headsets?
It looks vibe coded to me. Shitload of emojis in the readme, only three commits where all of the code was added at once via file upload, account is two days old and named specifically for this project
Good question, seems newer but rely on the same mechanism.
Someone else mentioned the less copyleft license (MIT vs. AGPL) as something to consider.
Great question! Key differences:
- NoPeek detects BOTH smart glasses AND VR headsets (Quest, Vision Pro, Pico, Vive, PSVR etc)
- Background scanning via foreground service — works when app is closed
- Distance estimation (~2m ~5m ~10m)
- Detection history saved locally
- Configurable RSSI threshold and notification cooldown
- Smart device grouping
- Sound alarm on detection
Nearby Glasses is great and inspired some of our detection approach — NoPeek builds on it with more devices and more features.
But does it hit them with DDOS attacks?
FWIW I think detecting VR with Meta Quest, Apple Vision Pro, Pico VR is quite funny. It's like ... hard NOT to detect such devices. You see a huge slab of plastic on the face of someone potentially looking in your direction and the cameras are numerous and visible.
So... for Meta Ray-Ban and Oakley Meta definitely because they are designed to look like traditional glasses and that's IMHO very wrong. For others like Snap Spectacles or TCL RayNeo it's quite obvious but still, OK makes sense.
Sadly as 404 media and others reported a lot of abuse came from wearing sneakingly such glasses then coercing people with the footage. I hope people who do abuse those tools do get prosecuted properly.
What the fuck is that README and why does it stink of slop?
I'm not qualified to tell if the code is just as sloppy, but I'm not touching that.
This needs to be taken on. I'd love an app that just notifies me whenever there's one nearby. Maybe it could play the "I'll be watching you" bit out of the police song.
APK now available! 🎉 github.com/getnopeek/nopeek-android/releases
Download app-debug.apk — no build needed. Works on Android 8.0+
why does this need to be a separate app? There are other Bluetooth apps which will notify you when it sees a device with a mac address and will record the signal strength and keep a record on a map. Just add a profile to those apps for the manufacturer mac prefix.
Feel free to suggest similar apps that are privacy friendly (no spying ads, telemetry, or other unwanted "features") and quick overview of where to enable realtime alerts for specific mac prefixes in the app to mimic this functionality. I'd be interested.
Thanks, but I couldn't find a way to set alerts for a set of addresses like the OP app scans for, only for a specific MAC address. Wouldn't be feasible to enter all possible addresses since that would be many millions of addresses for each manufacturer prefix.
If you go to Radar Alerts, set the filter to use the manufacturer. The readme in OPs GitHub page lists these manufacturers: https://github.com/getnopeek/nopeek-android#%EF%B8%8F-devices-detected
Yeah, unfortunately the By Manufacturer list is limited and doesn't for example include the Meta glasses 0x0D53. So, still isn't a feasible alternative unless more prefixes are added or the ability to add your own is added.
I see, admittedly I didn't check too closely but see what you're saying now. I've had good luck with this app for tracking other BLE devices around. FWIW the MAC address filter takes a wild card value (using *), but I'm not too familiar with how the manufacturer ID and MAC address manufacturer prefix are related, if at all. Anyway, all this to say that while the NoPeek app is focused on just smart glasses, other apps exist that have similar functionality, and are easier to install.
Pretty good idea considering this:
https://cambridgeanalytica.org/surveillance-privacy/dhs-ice-glasses-facial-recognition-2027-50722/
Americans, we live under fascist capitalism. We've got to adapt and push back.
Just a thought: politicians should not be allowed to use such apps. This right-to-privacy shit has gone too far, in the wrong direction, protecting ONLY the wrong people.
Fairness is pretty much a left-wing principle whereas excluding others from the inner group is a right-wring principle... so it makes sense.
Up-skirt photos are the one area where this gets me caught-up; Either a hypocrite or a shitty person. For the sake of consistency, I tend towards shittiness - the only real reason there's anything like an expectation of privacy in public is so shitty (powerful)people can get-away with shitty things, when really, being in-public is being on-display.
Then there's my stance on getting "caught" having sex on a park bench in a secluded forest by way of a trail-cam. I'm far from convinced that video evidence should count as evidence of an otherwise truly private, victemless, "crime" that otherwise wouldn't be. We should only be jailing public officials caught-out in conflicts of interest/corruption like-so, and almost never the camera-man.
Instead, its the opposite. We are surprisingly far into all of this deep-fake and leaked-video shit for the average person to have any qualms about saying "whether that video is real or not is none of your business", as if significant resources will be spent validating all but the highest-profile of images, but I get there are people who are generally embarassed and not just wrapped-up in their personal "sin" of having been portrayed or caught in a compromising position.
None of it upsets me so much as former strippers or adult film stars losing their jobs over shit that's years-behind them, while genuine pedos escape notice for decades. I'll say it again: society and the law are laser-focused on the wrong shit, and from the wrong-end of the turd at that.
