this post was submitted on 26 May 2026
80 points (98.8% liked)

Technology

84920 readers
3495 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Sam Altman says OpenAI wants to sell intelligence like a utility

During a recent appearance at BlackRock in Washington, D.C., OpenAI's Sam Altman, shared his vision for the future of AI. At one point saying, “We see a future where intelligence is a utility, like electricity or water, and people buy it from us on a meter.”

Altman was describing a world where AI becomes a foundational infrastructure, something woven into everyday life so deeply that consumers and businesses simply “plug into” it the same way they rely on electricity, Wi-Fi or running water.

all 28 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] shittydwarf@sh.itjust.works 42 points 47 minutes ago (3 children)

They don't have intelligence, they have spicy AutoCorrect

[–] daggermoon@piefed.world 14 points 38 minutes ago (3 children)

Exactly, I see people freaking out about this tech replacing them. It's not gonna happen, not with OpenAI's tech anyway. They don't have intelligence to sell. They have LLM's that are good at tricking people who don't know better into thinking it's inteligant. LLM's can't think and they can't reason.

[–] socphoenix@lemmy.world 12 points 23 minutes ago

I think the worry of large layoffs and instability while idiots try to use AI instead of people is founded even if it’ll end in disaster.

[–] kylie_kraft@lemmy.world 3 points 21 minutes ago (1 children)

my favorite part of this is that after decades of sci-fi dystopias based on fear of evil AI overlords that destroy the Earth, in reality we're creating a dystopia where we destroy the Earth to build a bunch of shitty plagiarism bots and treat them like they're AI overlords.

[–] Banana@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 minutes ago

I'm not worried about this tech replacing people, I'm worried about the fact that people are actively losing neural elasticity from using LLMs to think for them.

[–] Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 24 minutes ago

It’s so useless for niche topics it’s not even funny… which is the only thing I’d ever want actual AI for in the first place.

[–] zd9@lemmy.world 1 points 1 minute ago

so... even if it's not complete AGI, it's still extremely helpful for many industries, and extremely disruptive. There are long ways to go with it, but even these intermediate products are massive.

Having said that, it's also in a bubble or the peak of the hype cycle. That doesn't mean it's nothing though. It will cause massive upheaval.

[–] teft@piefed.social 30 points 46 minutes ago

So they stole the data to create these abominations and now they want to sell it back to everyone. Does no one see the fucking hypocrisy?

[–] baronvonj@piefed.social 53 points 1 hour ago

they're pretty up front about it. They want to gatekeep knowledge so they can monetize it and control the labor.

[–] pennomi@lemmy.world 16 points 36 minutes ago (1 children)

Impossible. It doesn’t require any local infrastructure, so there’s no inherent lock-in like you see with utilities.

Utterly delusional CEO.

[–] terranoid@lemmy.cafe 1 points 4 minutes ago

Except water. I bet this is some weird way of arguing they are a utility so have a right to utility infrastructure and how water is distributed.

Less "we are a utility" and more "we need all your utilities, all your clean water, all your power, and we want to decide how it's used"

[–] nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 34 minutes ago

It's wild how almost everything in the world is comic book evil from like a really poorly written comic.

[–] Jhex@lemmy.world 4 points 19 minutes ago* (last edited 19 minutes ago)

You'd have to have intelligence to sell first... you dollar store con man

[–] Reygle@lemmy.world 4 points 14 minutes ago

This man is in the top 10 of my "I hope they get Luigi'd" list

[–] Th4tGuyII@fedia.io 3 points 19 minutes ago (1 children)

Great. Sabotage the collective intelligence of humanity so they can sell it back to us. Seems like either the bubble pops or we do.

[–] zd9@lemmy.world 2 points 9 minutes ago

Classsic "Nestle water stealing in Africa" strategy

[–] etherphon@piefed.world 9 points 53 minutes ago

Are you sure you have enough to spare Sam? Har har har.

[–] MrErr@piefed.world 5 points 30 minutes ago

Someone else is going to giveaway free intelligence, only so they can collect our data. It has happened before.

[–] TheFogan@programming.dev 3 points 18 minutes ago

Honestly my thoughts on how I'd actually use AI... versus OpenAI's are exactly the opposite. Honestly I could see a world where a lot of people get an on site LLM server. Plug it in etc... I could actually see that as useful, IE keep it air gapped, and then you can train it off of your e-mails, your house etc..., not trust everything to some outside company. From what I'm gathering from the chinese open source models that sounds very viable.

Of course the ultimate annoyance is, the datacenter surge is actually taking compute out of regular price ranges.

Actually annoyingly makes me think of the point in time that electricity itself was at this crossroads, where eddison wanted every house to have a DC generator, while Tesla was pushing for AC transmission to send current from centralized locations

[–] disorderly@lemmy.world 1 points 36 seconds ago

Bro you can't even run a publicly traded company. Don't even say the word "utility". Fuck outta here.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 5 points 36 minutes ago

“Critics”

Honestly, it’s rather remarkable how far up his own ass Altman is. In any other context, he’d be considered an expert contortionist.

[–] DarkCloud@lemmy.world 1 points 2 minutes ago* (last edited 55 seconds ago)

It's VERY aggravating to use.

"No I said DON'T include this information I've told you three times no."

"Did I ask for your speculation/discussion?"

"No, I said CITE ONLINE SOURCES, not just make them up!"

"NONE OF YOUR EXTERNAL LINKS WORK!!"

...half an hour later you realise the first answer is probably the best you're going to get, and you'll still need to fact check it before using it.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 1 points 10 minutes ago

If you’re gonna be dumb you better ~~be tough~~ have a lot of tokens

[–] RaoulDook@lemmy.world 3 points 12 minutes ago (1 children)

But I don't need it, and most people also don't need it. I've never spent any money on AI and I still don't talk to any inanimate objects.

[–] terranoid@lemmy.cafe 1 points 3 minutes ago

But they need our utilities, all of them. So they want to get ahead of the game and take over that side of government now.