this post was submitted on 30 May 2026
574 points (98.8% liked)

memes

21394 readers
2881 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/Ads/AI SlopNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live. We also consider AI slop to be spam in this community and is subject to removal.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 11 points 1 hour ago (2 children)

Equal Rights == None of us fucks are allowed to drive.

[–] iocase@lemmy.zip 2 points 11 minutes ago* (last edited 11 minutes ago) (1 children)

Trains and trams and busses.

God I wish... It costs me $250 a month for my car and I own the fucking thing (if you include maintenance costs) so I drive to work twice a day, five times a week, and try to get errands done during my return commute. I might drive once or twice on the weekend, and there are about 4.4 weeks per month on average. That means I spend $5.28 every time I drive. That is WAY MORE THAN TRANSIT COSTS!! Especially if we spent the money we spend on roads and cars, instead on trams or busses

For reference I also pay for car centric stuff through my utility bills. 10-30% of my utilities might be effectively me paying for the externality of ripping up roads to replace buried infrastructure, that then needs to be paid for AGAIN using my taxes when potholes form over prior ground disturbance, and paid for AGAIN when the road fails early and needs to be ripped up to fix the subgrade.

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 1 points 4 minutes ago

Trains and trams and busses.

But who will drive them? 🤔

[–] Aneb@lemmy.world 4 points 38 minutes ago

Honestly as a bicyclist I feel cars are way to powerful for regular people. Ebikes are great, fast and small

[–] kungen@feddit.nu 4 points 46 minutes ago

There are no rights in traffic, only obligations.

[–] pomfegranate@sh.itjust.works 2 points 9 minutes ago

Driving isn't a right, it's a privilege

[–] Amnesigenic@lemmy.ml 2 points 32 minutes ago

Shouldn't be forced to drive, the US is deliberately designed to be hostile towards pedestrians in ways that the vast majority of people are unable to do anything about. A good percentage of those people also know damn well they're bad drivers and would choose anything else if they could

[–] fodor@lemmy.zip 1 points 35 minutes ago

Road rage is cultural, and it's amazing how it changes from country to country. In some places you just don't see it much, because it makes no sense.

[–] thevoidzero@lemmy.world 33 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

I don't want to drive, give me walkable cities and public transportation

[–] Diurnambule@jlai.lu 4 points 1 hour ago

Same I am forced to drive, please teleport me. At least biking is fun but you can't do 400km in 4h.

[–] Lushed_Lungfish@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 hour ago

Per the Ontario driver's handbook: Driving is a privilege, not a right.

[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 11 points 2 hours ago

Driving isn't a right.

[–] leftzero@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 hour ago

One is not incompatible with the other.

We can have equal rights, even as many rights as possible (as equal rights could include no one having any rights) and not be allowed to harm or endanger each other, or by extension the environment.

This alone takes care of practically everyone who shouldn't be allowed to drive, without giving them any less rights.

More importantly, though, the fact that you're experiencing road rage and thus driving while impaired by it means that you shouldn't be allowed to drive, because you're evidently a threat to everyone else on or about the road.

[–] GraniteM@lemmy.world 28 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

I was at my first gun show with an older friend who knew guns better than I did who I was following around to keep me from making any stupid decisions.

There's a table with a sign for "Constitutional Carry," where they don't think you should need a special license to concealed carry a handgun.

My friend walks up to these two guys at the table, and says "Hey, just so you know, I hope you guys fail."

The younger of the two kind of bristles, but the older one, a dude with a long white beard, says "Oh, why?"

My friend says "Because I worked in a gun shop for fifteen years, and I helped fill out more concealed carry applications than I can count and..." at this point she gestures around at the huge room behind us, "I wouldn't trust 95% of the people in this room with any gun at all."

And the old dude behind the table smiles and nods his head and says "Yeah, that's a fair point."

So anyway, that's the day I bought a Ruger GP-100 in 357 Magnum.

[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 22 points 4 hours ago (5 children)

So anyway, that's the day I bought a Ruger GP-100 in 357 Magnum.

1000004015

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] BackgrndNoize@lemmy.world 12 points 3 hours ago (1 children)
[–] NaibofTabr@infosec.pub 2 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Congratulations, you've just reinvented the Electoral College!

[–] blarghly@lemmy.world 3 points 2 hours ago

I mean, really, representative democracy.

[–] edinbruh@feddit.it 101 points 6 hours ago (2 children)
[–] BillyClark@piefed.social 32 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Yes, and it's especially obvious with the example of driving. Driving is a licensed activity where you have to pass a competency test before you're allowed to drive without supervision.

I've had the thought that a lot more things should be licensed with a competency test. Like, for example, I don't know... This is just off the wall and completely random, but maybe a person who runs for President of the United States should have to pass the same exam that people take as part of the process of becoming citizens. Probably the presidential candidates should take a much harder test, but that would require a lot of oversight to make sure the test isn't made to eliminate specific candidates.

[–] ramasses@social.ozymandias.club 9 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

But Trump took a cognitive test, he is good to be president. /s

[–] BillyClark@piefed.social 4 points 3 hours ago

My mother has Alzheimer's and I am always with her when she takes that test, so I end up mentally taking the test alongside her. They actually have two different tests, depending on which doctor she sees, a shorter one and a longer one, and my mother mostly gets the shorter one. There's one part where they list four (five? let's go with four) words and have you repeat them back to them. Then, they ask you some other questions, and then they ask you to recall those four words again.

Other than misremembering the exact date, which I'm guessing everybody occasionally has the wrong date in their head, that question remembering the four words after being distracted by a different question is the only part where I could ever have lost points, since I have occasionally forgotten one of the words. It's the only question that I feel a normal person has a chance of missing. It truly is a test specifically for dementia.

The fact that Trump always says the test is difficult and that he got a perfect score on it, given Trump's history lying about things like winning golf tournaments, I think is absolute proof that he does extremely poorly on the test. He very likely fails it. He brings it up all the time because he's as bad at lying as he is at everything else. Good liars know not to bring up the lie a lot. Bad liars keep repeating the lie because they're afraid you might not believe them.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 39 points 5 hours ago (2 children)
  • Everyone should have equal rights

  • To ride the bus

Boom. Solved.

[–] MintyFresh@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

As a bus driver, hard disagree! There's people who will wait at a bus stop, wait in line to board the bus, and only then will they spend 5 minutes digging through their pockets or bags for fare.

Or ask where the bus is going, expecting me to tediously list out all the places this bus goes, and when asked the very reasonable question"where are you trying to get to?" Become cagey and refuse to answer. Then ask the same vague and open ended questions.

These people should report to the nearest artillery practice range asap

[–] Hazel@piefed.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 hour ago

Those are solvable problems though, there's plenty of busses who don't accept change already. You can add ticket 'vending machines' and have better signage for this.

[–] drunkpostdisaster@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

I've seen people lose that right. Hell, I almost did.

[–] Beth@piefed.social 6 points 3 hours ago

Yesterday on the way home I thought I was going to be affluenza’d by some crazy kid in a green glittery wrapped Beamer. They were so close to my bumper and making so many jerking, erratic movements that I was too worried to merge lest they did at the same time and sent us all rolling. Traffic was dense enough that I couldn’t speed up and really couldn’t safely merge initially. They ended up driving down the middle of the two lane highway and nearly ran a few people into the ditch. At least my demise would have been on the dash cam I guess.

[–] 6244901@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 hours ago

I agree with the right side

[–] Demdaru@lemmy.world 6 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Eaaasy, buddy. No matter what did you do, next to normal consequences your driving license goes buh-buy for a year. Hit someone's car? Fine + License buhbye for a year. Hit a lamp post? Same. Hit a kid? Jail for manslaughter or whatever it's called...plus licence buhbuye for a year. If they also take your license, then that also qualifies.

Speeding ticket? Guess what. Fine plus license buhbye.

No buy backs, no slippin, fuck your status. Can't drive? Ride public. Can't afford to be so poor? Pay someone to drive you. If they hit something tho, you better start walkin'. xD

[–] judgyweevil@feddit.it 16 points 4 hours ago

You have the right to exercise your driving skills, if you have them

[–] mushroommunk@lemmy.today 47 points 6 hours ago (3 children)

Solid public transport would fix a lot of that but Ford and GM gonna Ford and GM.

People go "ooh, a trolley car!", when's the last time you heard anyone go "Ooh, a Lyft"?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] sudoMakeUser@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 hours ago

Ah yes, the right to drive a car.

[–] Zephorah@discuss.online 12 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (6 children)

Driving isn’t a right, it’s a privilege.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›