this post was submitted on 01 Jun 2026
495 points (99.6% liked)

Mildly Infuriating

46177 readers
265 users here now

Home to all things "Mildly Infuriating" Not infuriating, not enraging. Mildly Infuriating. All posts should reflect that. Please post actually infuriating posts to !actually_infuriating@lemmy.world

I want my day mildly ruined, not completely ruined. Please remember to refrain from reposting old content. If you post a post from reddit it is good practice to include a link and credit the OP. I'm not about stealing content!

It's just good to get something in this website for casual viewing whilst refreshing original content is added overtime.


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means: -No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...


7. Content should match the theme of this community.


-Content should be Mildly infuriating. If your post better fits !Actually_Infuriating put it there.

-The Community !actuallyinfuriating has been born so that's where you should post the big stuff.

...


8. Reposting of Reddit content is permitted, but attribution is not required in any way. No links to Reddit in post body


-If you would like to provide a source link, do so in the comments but not in the post body.

...

...


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Lemmy Review

2.Lemmy Be Wholesome

3.Lemmy Shitpost

4.No Stupid Questions

5.You Should Know

6.Credible Defense


Reach out to LillianVS for inclusion on the sidebar.

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

WASHINGTON — Astronomers are calling on nations to ban advertising in space that can be seen from the ground, calling it the latest threat to the dark and quiet sky.

At a briefing during the 245th Meeting of the American Astronomical Society earlier this month, the organization rolled out a statement calling for bans on “obtrusive space advertising” because of the interference it could cause for groundbased astronomy.

Obtrusive space advertising is defined in U.S. federal law as “advertising in outer space that is capable of being recognized by a human being on the surface of the Earth without the aid of a telescope or other technological device.” Such advertising is banned in federal law through prohibitions on granting launch licenses for missions carrying payloads to carry out space advertising.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 3 points 19 hours ago

~~astronomers ~~ every human being

FTFY

[–] Leviathan@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago (8 children)

If they block my stars I will go full terrorist.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] Naich@piefed.world 120 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I will not buy anything from any company that puts advertising in space. I will also make it my life's work to persuade everyone else likewise.

[–] db_null@lemmy.dbzer0.com 40 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

We're 43 people already, the remaining 95% will continue to buy it anyway because...

  1. It just tastes better
  2. It can't be that bad
  3. It's convenient
  4. I've always bought that
  5. I have nothing to hide

Pick as many as you like. More than just dissuading people, I think it's high time to sabotage and destruct.

[–] nutbutter@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 1 day ago

These are exactly the reasons why people are still not boycotting Nestlé.

[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 10 points 1 day ago (5 children)

TIL 43 people are 5% of the world population...

Also, how do you plan to sabotage space billboards?

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 day ago

Well, you wouldn't sabotage the billboard. You would sabotage their factories until it costs them more than the billboard makes them. Make it unprofitable to create them.

[–] med@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago

The same way they're planning to upload new ads.

[–] Dojan@pawb.social 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Etterra@discuss.online 6 points 1 day ago

Aliens: we come in peace

Scientists: can you help us with some of our problems? Maybe give us fusion power? Tell us about your culture?

Aliens: actually we came about the Coca-Cola.

[–] Odo@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

Anyone read Arthur C. Clarke's short story "Watch This Space" where a giant Coke logo is lit up on the moon? It was meant to be funny, not instructional. Sigh. "Torment Nexus" and all that, I suppose.

[–] sportsjorts@lemmy.zip 40 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Please God no. This timeline is fucking horrible.

[–] VanRayInd@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Is it time for molotovs yet?

[–] sportsjorts@lemmy.zip 8 points 1 day ago

I would say it’s long past time. Just waiting until ice kicks down my door and shoots my cats and puts a bag over my head with this post.

[–] Cypher45@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Oh please, y'all would talk about molotoves and guillotines everyday, yet none of you would do a thing.

[–] backalleycoyote@lemmy.today 4 points 1 day ago

Wild that you went from suggesting scalping to accusing others of incapacity for violence. When’s the last time you scalped someone, or were at least present when someone was scalped?

But seriously, don’t answer that. Admissions of arson and interpersonal violence don’t mean much anonymously online unless you bring receipts, but as anonymity isn’t actually anonymous, so dropping a Greatest Hits of crimes the state couldn’t prove at the time for clout is ill advised.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)

The day the night sky fills with billboards is the day I switch from "I really hope we as a species can get better" to "I really hope we as a species become extinct soon."

[–] brap@lemmy.world 51 points 1 day ago (1 children)

If I see your shit advertised in space I will never buy your product again.

[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago
[–] LordCrom@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

Its already at a point where I can't take a long exposure without a dozen spacex satellites and other junk zooming through my frame. Light pollution is already at a tipping point where no stars are visible in or around large cities.

Support your local amateur astronomer club. Support the dark skies association.

[–] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 34 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

This is exactly like skywriting.

Once it got popular it got really popular for advertising, then people got mad and it was an affront to God and legislators were forced to shut it down.

But also, after the novelty it stopped being effective and it just made people angry.

Now, arguably 2026’s companies care less about making people mad than any time since like the coal wars. But I still think you can’t keep posting people off forever and expect good brand outcomes. And if you can, you don’t need ads do you?

[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

the coal wars

As an aside, it just made me a little happy to know that there's at least one other person out in the world that's read a history book at some point.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] JoShmoe@ani.social 5 points 1 day ago

Imagine being born under an off-brand star.

[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 16 points 1 day ago

It's about time.

Although honestly, with this government, all this might do is give them ideas...

They should add to it though. No construction projects or any commercial activity on the near-side of the moon.

Do all other advertising next

[–] favoredponcho@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 day ago

And just like AI, everyone will agree before the technology is mature. And then someone will make a breakthrough and find it’s possible and then the government will fold without even firing a shot and suddenly you’ll see ads all over the sky even though 99% of the population doesn’t fucking want it.

[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 21 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

An older story, I know, but today was the first I heard of space-based advertising, and it made my blood boil a little.

To be clear, the infuriating part is people trying to put ads in the sky, not the astronomers fighting back, who are in fact awesome.

[–] Clent@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I don't think it goes far enough. Satellites should not be allowed to arrange or emit for any aesthetics reason, advertising or not. They should be required to do everything they can to go unseen.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Airfried@piefed.social 5 points 1 day ago

Worry not astronomers! AI space tech companies are already working hard on telescopes on moon which you can access via a monthly subscription! Hurray! /s

[–] Cascio@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago

Excerpt from "Red Dwarf: Infinity Welcomes Careful Drivers": For anyone living on Earth the result would be mindfizzlingly spectacular. One hundred and twenty-eight stars would appear to go supernova simultaneously, burning with such ferocity they would be visible even in daylight.

And the hundred and twenty-eight supernovae would spell out a message.

And this would be the message:

‘COKE ADDS LIFE!’

[–] Lazer365@feddit.nl 8 points 1 day ago

Isn’t it lovely that we live in a world where we need a law to ban such a thing? It honestly already doesn’t matter anymore because when you look up at the sky you almost see more Starlink trash than stars…

[–] Saledovil@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago

Suggestion: Deploy anti satellite 🛰 weapon, and extort other nations by threatening their satellites in order to pay off the national debt. Somebody get Donald Trump on the phone.

I'm only half joking. Kessler syndrome is probably going to happen sooner or later anyway. And I do think it would be possible to convince Trump the scheme is a good idea if you had access to him.

[–] billbasher@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It would probably work better as a weapon against companies on the ground than as what is intended. Advertise for a company and piss people off so they boycott or harm the company instead of buying stuff from them

we dont matter though, it'll impress investors and the media, that's what matters these days

we are just slaves, until we organize we have no power

[–] DagwoodIII@piefed.social 9 points 1 day ago

[off topic]

"The Man Who Sold The Moon" by Robert Heinlein. Satire of big business written long before Sputnik. Am american hustler is raising money for a Lunar rocket. One of his pitches is that if the Soviets get there first they plan on putting a big hammer and sickle across the face of the moon.

Fun read.

[–] yesman@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago (2 children)

If we ban space advertising, then only criminals will be able to advertise in space.

What we need to fight bad advertisers in space is good advertisers in space.

This could be solved if we only allowed astronauts to conceal-carry ad-copy.

(I like to use gun arguments out of context, because it emphasizes how dumb they are.)

[–] yermaw@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 day ago

Coke adds life...

[–] elvith@feddit.org 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Obtrusive space advertising is defined in U.S. federal law as “advertising in outer space that is capable of being recognized by a human being on the surface of the Earth without the aid of a telescope or other technological device.”

Too bad they have the requirement for a technological device. Else I'd be able to argue that I shouldn't get any ads from satellite TV or when using Starlink or...

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›