this post was submitted on 03 Jun 2026
402 points (100.0% liked)

Privacy

48886 readers
1013 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Hello people, my family recently bought a Renault 5 e-tech. The car itself is great, but there are some aspects that creep me out, especially the driver-facing camera. We didn't actually know that such a camera existed before we bought the car, it was only mentioned as the car was given to us.

The cameras official purpose is to see, if you are tired and paying attention to the road, by some "AI magic", I suppose. You can also let it scan your face, so that you automatically get logged into your profile.

I personally think, that that is kinda creepy, especially as there is no visual indication if the camera is currently recording and no official way to disable the camera hardware-wise. When it is being coverd, the car immediately complains about it.

When talking to friends or family about it, I got one of two reactions: equal concern, or "nice feature actually", "what about the camera on your laptop?", "you are way too paranoid", "I have noting to hide; it is only me driving being recorded".

I have also seen such cameras in other cars, BYD for example.

What do you think, is this creepy or am I too paranoid? Does anyone know where the actual data is processed, on device or on some cloud server? Do you have any experience with such cameras? I couldn't really find any information about it on the internet.

(page 3) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] quarkquasar@lemmy.world 8 points 13 hours ago

The only way I'd tolerate a camera in a vehicle with me would be if I was simply using it as a taxi, and it was driving itself and monitoring the inside.

Otherwise, nah. Any camera in a car I owned would be getting disabled and destroyed just for safe measure.

[–] spacehulk@lemmy.zip 36 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

This is being touted for safety reasons, yet there are still no guidelines and headlight brightness, headlight height, hood height of pickup trucks, etc. Regulate the vehicle exterior for actual and immediate safety benefits before trying to float this privacy infringing shit.

[–] FatVegan@leminal.space 12 points 16 hours ago

Car regulations are so much fun. Atere you crazy? Your car can't be that loud, there are several reasons for it, obviously. Oh wait, you mean a rich people car? Nevermind, those can be the loudest cars imaginable, because they need 900 hp

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] mindwanderer@feddit.org 34 points 18 hours ago (9 children)

Cars collect data about you to sell them to insurance companies. There was a study by the mozilla foundation about this and they said that there is basicly no modern car that does not do that.

The only thing you can do to avoid them is buy an old car.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] Kongar@lemmy.dbzer0.com 41 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

You’re not being paranoid - that would be a hard “no” for me. I’d keep a clunker from the 70’s alive and drive that forever.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] cyberpunk007@lemmy.ca 19 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

This is one of those great ideas which can easily be implemented offline but they make it require phoning their data collection unit. Fuck everything about that. I would have stopped and said uhhh no. I want my money back.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] bridgeenjoyer@sh.itjust.works 8 points 14 hours ago

Need to be smashing them. Call up the dealer and scream at them. Do not buy new cars.

Still can't believe we allowed this to happen. Well, I'll be repairing old cars till I die I guess.

[–] Rat_in_a_hat@lemmy.ca 30 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Check the privacy laws in your country. If in Europe, you can have the services disconnected. Looks like a Renault so sometimes cars manufactured in the EU will come built in with the ability to turn off the feature.

Car data privacy is the worst there is today and will get much worse with timd. Mozilla foundation put out a report recently

https://www.mozillafoundation.org/en/blog/privacy-nightmare-on-wheels-every-car-brand-reviewed-by-mozilla-including-ford-volkswagen-and-toyota-flunks-privacy-test/

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] FineCoatMummy@sh.itjust.works 19 points 17 hours ago

Moz's landing page about car privacy.

Depends on the car ofc, but the worst ones not only send video from inside the car to the company, they send data from outside the car! Like people walking around and stuff.

Reuters says:

Some of the recordings caught Tesla customers, opens new tab in embarrassing situations. One ex-employee described a video of a man approaching a vehicle completely naked. Also shared: crashes and road-rage incidents. One crash video in 2021 showed a Tesla driving at high speed in a residential area hitting a child riding a bike, according to another ex-employee. The child flew in one direction, the bike in another. The video spread around a Tesla office in San Mateo, California, via private one-on-one chats, “like wildfire,” the ex-employee said.

Other images were more mundane, such as pictures of dogs and funny road signs that employees made into memes by embellishing them with amusing captions or commentary, before posting them in private group chats.

“We could see inside people's garages and their private properties,” said another former employee. “Let's say that a Tesla customer had something in their garage that was distinctive, you know, people would post those kinds of things.”

Lots more troubling shit at the link. Tesla's probably close tot he worst, but most modern cars are like all the privacy clusterfuck of phones... but worse.

[–] kureta@lemmy.ml 29 points 19 hours ago

It is very creepy. Especially if there is no official way to disable the camera, so that it does not complain about the camera being disabled.

[–] ricecake@sh.itjust.works 25 points 18 hours ago (7 children)

Fatigue detection is a real thing that doesn't use the type of AI that people think of when they hear that word today most often. It's not language based but instead it's able to recognize faces and posture, tell where your attention is focused, and recognize signs of fatigue like head drop, eyes closing, and attention drifting from the road.
It, along with other attention based driver safety features, are real and effective and can be done on device with a computer with less power than a modern cellphone.

It is, however, at least a little creepy. It's made a lot more so by it not being disclosed upfront with disclosures and full user awareness. It should be explained by both the website, the car manual, the salesperson and the car itself exactly what it's doing and where any video data is being sent. It's probably processing the video locally and at most sending telemetry about which driver just sat down and such, but 1) you might not want that 2) unless they actually tell you that you don't know.

It's not paranoia to want an explanation and appropriate assurances, or for it to be in your control. You don't need to assume it's the worst case for that to be true. It's probably a real safety feature with a couple of quality of life features taped on so people can see it do something, since you don't really see a passive safety feature. But without actual communication you don't actually know that.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] aldo@lemmy.ml 28 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

It’s creepy even if it has a legitimate purpose. There’s a move to make this kind of tech mandatory in all cars, with the purported aim of stopping drunk driving. https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/federal-surveillance-tech-becomes-mandatory-161321992.html

[–] bridgeenjoyer@sh.itjust.works 7 points 14 hours ago

Surveillance is always under the guise of "protect the children" from the same government who rapes and kills children with 0 repercussions.

[–] EncryptKeeper@lemmy.world 17 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

These will be required in all cars sold in the US as soon as next year and close to zero people are talking about.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Professorozone@lemmy.world 7 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

I'm guessing there's a microphone as well? Most cars have then now.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›