this post was submitted on 04 Jun 2026
862 points (94.3% liked)

Selfhosted

59778 readers
838 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

  7. No low-effort posts. This is subjective and will largely be determined by the community member reports.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Please don't expect the community to give you answers to your questions which you then delete right afterwards. Those of us who put time into answering your questions are not doing so just to serve your personal needs, we are here to help build a community knowledge base that others can search and reference.

This has become a chronic issue with Lemmy and its starting to feel like it's a waste of time to answer questions.

(page 3) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] queerlilhayseed@piefed.blahaj.zone 13 points 5 days ago (10 children)

I have mixed feelings on post deletion. On the one hand, historical technical forum conversations are an incredibly valuable resource, and /c/selfhosted is a technical community. The value comes from having a history in context, and deleting part of the context damages the whole and makes the whole corpus less useful overall. It also allows incorrect or outdated information to fester when there isn't a strong historical context that can be referenced.

On the other hand, people are right to be concerned about leaving large tracts of text available on the open internet, where it can be scraped, profiled, and possibly de-anonymized. I am very sympathetic to those who delete out of concerns for their own privacy, and I don't know what a good solution is.

Maybe a compromise would be (on user "delete") to leave the contents of a post intact, but simply delete the username from the post, and the post from the user's history? Deletion on the fediverse is a bit of a sham anyway, and it would leave valuable discussions intact for other users.

[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 7 points 5 days ago

If you post something to a federated platform, it is literally never deleted. There is no privacy to be gained from deleting posts from the fediverse.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] Senal@programming.dev 10 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (4 children)

I imagine this is a controversial opinion....but isn't the idiomatic solution to this to either:

petition the mods to get this rule added and enforced

or

To start a community that enforces this rule and let it compete with this one.

Isn't that the whole idea of federation?

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] go_go_gadget@lemmy.world 9 points 5 days ago

Holy stackoverflow effect batman!

[–] Trilogy3452@lemmy.world 6 points 4 days ago (1 children)

It'd be helpful to put some links to known good resources for common questions in the e.g. about page.

Also are you suggesting we don't ask or don't ask and then delete?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›