Now you can't even find the fucking thing when you need it. Thanks, "UX design".
this post was submitted on 05 Jun 2026
490 points (99.2% liked)
memes
21461 readers
2512 users here now
Community rules
1. Be civil
No trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour
2. No politics
This is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world
3. No recent reposts
Check for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month
4. No bots
No bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins
5. No Spam/Ads/AI Slop
No advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live. We also consider AI slop to be spam in this community and is subject to removal.
A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment
Sister communities
- !tenforward@lemmy.world : Star Trek memes, chat and shitposts
- !lemmyshitpost@lemmy.world : Lemmy Shitposts, anything and everything goes.
- !linuxmemes@lemmy.world : Linux themed memes
- !comicstrips@lemmy.world : for those who love comic stories.
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
UX, whatsat?
Also, it completely disappears after a second.
And why is it a different color on the addons page anyway??
Is that add-on good?
Now: I
I'm partial to 2006
We peaked in 2009
What was wrong with the high contrast of 1988?
It is at home in both light and dark mode
My only criticism is lack of affordance on the slider. Is the dark part the slider or the light part? Some of the newer ones have the little ridges for "traction".
The issue with 1988 is that it isn't intuitive what the background color is, and thus if the bar is up or down.
The middle years are obvious because of the 3d effect. The last one is obvious because the background is the same for both the arrows and the bar.
2012? Elder? Cmon, it wasn't that long ago... wait... no...
Definitely either 88 or 98. Large, very visible, no bullshit. I prefer 98, but would also be perfectly happy with 88. The reason I like 98 better than 88 is because 98, while not as high of contrast, is closer to if it's physically there, with shadows and stuff, and therefore visually faster recognizable as a scroll bar, it's more intuitive.
Give me 98 with the little lines of the next 3. I think it enhances noticeability quite a lot without adding a distracting amount of contrast
Agree. 98 with grip would be my ideal.
88, because it covers visually impaired better. That higher contrast pays off. But I remember you could do some color theming for the 98 version, so maybe it couldve been fixed in that regard. And I agree on the design being generally easier to understand.
We've gotta bring back frutiger aero.
I like how they added some grip between 2001 - 2009 so you would have some traction when you used then
My cursor kept slipping off them all the time anyway 😢
I hate the modern ones you need to hover above so they even display, and then it's 1 pixel wide and a shade of grey that's about 2% darker than white.
Less functional and 500 lines of js garbage.
Some suck, sure, but some work well. The ones on MacOS are good IMO, and some android ones (while others absolutely suck).
It's a few lines of css, no JS required.
.my-div:hover {
overflow-x: scroll;
}
And the look and feel of the scrollbar is generally determined by the browser/OS. Unless someone does a custom scrollbar implementation, but that is exceedingly rare. So that thin rounded gray bar is a browser/OS design, again, without any JS.
I don't know about scrollbars specifically, but apparently a lot of windows 11 is written in react
It’s the start menu that’s written in react.
Ew
what
I love how 1998 looks. It is clean and servers the purpose. 2001-2009 feel over designed, 1988 and 2012 not sure whether the dark part is the scroller or the light part lol.
And then they got thinner every year while screens got wider..
But our eyes cant see more than a few pixels wide anyways!
An endangered species
1988 still the best one, somehow
agreed. no embellishment, just design that makes the functionality obvious.
Yeah, and then talentless hacks kept fucking with it for almost 40 years just for the sake of fucking with it. Enshittification marches on.
1998 was truly the best time. When all OS widgets looked the same. And could be used in apps, and everything had a consistent look. Yeah you could override this in your app. But fuck people who did that. Everything looked so nice and uniform and you knew what to expect from a widget and its look and behavior. Get off my lawn.
imho the clustered version of the scroll bar buttons (like in Amiga Workbench 2.0+, Macintosh OS, macOS, KDE) make way more sense to me (minimal mouse movement to change scroll direction) than this spread out layout.
OS X Lion apparently forgot to add the scroll bar entirely
Hope somebody got fired for that epic blunder
System 1 my beloved
2009, pls.
But I guess with the end caps from 2006.
By 2026 AI does the scrolling for you, a feature made mandatory (all scrollbars removed) in 2028 😭
And pauses for 30 seconds over each ad.
More profitable to deliver ads seamlessly without pausing but shown continuously all the while scrolling. 100% profits!🤑💸
From next year the government will be allowed to scroll for you if they deem it in the interest of national security
'98 to '09 was the sweet spot. Textures make the page slider easier to spot and use.
I miss that glass aesthetic from 2001
Seems like it’s coming back
1998 was in my formative years with computers, so I will always be partial to it. Xfce can get pretty close.
Honestly I’m partial to it as well. Possibly for the same reasons, but also because the bar and buttons are clearly defined and have good contrast. The later designs begin to fade out until now the scroll bar is just a thin line, which is sometimes hidden, so you don’t see it unless you’re looking for it.
|
2020
2009 was peak