this post was submitted on 09 Jun 2026
740 points (99.5% liked)

Technology

85670 readers
3550 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] cannedtuna@lemmy.world 186 points 2 weeks ago (7 children)

Wild. Did they really think they could just hype this up and release something like this and not get found out?

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 88 points 2 weeks ago

That's how its done now thanks to assholes like this.

[–] gdog05@lemmy.world 63 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

It's worked for their channel so far.

[–] cannedtuna@lemmy.world 58 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (4 children)

Except they’ve misled investors, and that will get them into deep shit.

Because fuck consumers

Mislead consumers, FTC sleeps

Mislead investors…

[–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 30 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

What FTC lmao, they're a Finnish company registered in Estonia. Billionaires don't get fast tracked court cases here. They'll move to some other country long before anything happens.

[–] cannedtuna@lemmy.world 9 points 2 weeks ago

My mistake. I forgot other countries exist.

But yeah I dropped that key point I guess between finishing the article and commenting.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Frozengyro@lemmy.world 11 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Ftfy

Because fuck consumers

Mislead consumers, FTC sleeps

Mislead investors…

Also they just need to make a little donation and I'm sure they will be pardoned.

[–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 11 points 2 weeks ago

Pardoned by whom? We don't have presidential pardons in the countries they're operating out of.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] suigenerix@lemmy.world 22 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Reading the article, the investigation isn't a case of independent labs getting hold of the battery and definitively disproving Donut's claims. It's battery experts and researchers looking at the data Donut has released and saying, "these claims are extraordinary and the evidence doesn't yet convince us. Here's what we think the battery actually is." That's a very reasonable scientific position, especially when you're talking about 400 Wh/kg, 5-minute charging, and 100,000 cycles all at once.

But without independently tested samples, there are still a lot of unknowns and inferences involved. That's not to say the skeptics are wrong, but it's still arguably a case of skeptics being skeptical... reasonably so, but based on analysis of the available evidence rather than direct examination of the battery itself.

[–] ryven@lemmy.dbzer0.com 43 points 2 weeks ago (6 children)

This seems to be a smoking gun:

Researchers say the most convincing evidence came from measuring how the cell expanded during charging.

When a battery charges, ions move into the anode, causing it to expand. Graphite anodes have a unique expansion pattern because of changes in graphite’s layered structure. The Donut Lab cell showed this exact pattern.

This finding matters because sodium ions are too big to fit into graphite the way lithium ions do. According to investigators, the graphite expansion pattern clearly shows that lithium is the active ion in the battery.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 130 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Industry experts who met with CT Coatings representatives doubted their technical skills. Julian Zanau from the Fraunhofer Research Institute recalled concerns following discussions with company officials.

“The first impression I got was that these people have no idea how a battery actually works. They were talking about no rare earth metals in their batteries and therefore no lithium, and to any chemist lithium has nothing to do with rare earth minerals.”

🔥

[–] chaogomu@lemmy.world 41 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

The running theory I had seen was that they were licensing out someone else's tech, and then claiming it as their own.

And now this article shows that to be more true than I had thought.

Meanwhile, there's a company out of Taiwan doing this, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xQFVIs4leig

The guy cuts a cell in half with a pair of scissors, and as soon as the scissors are pulled away the little LED light comes back on.

[–] testaccount789@sh.itjust.works 8 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

These seem like ones tested by GreatScott 7 years ago: https://youtu.be/kJXRyWQgOY4

[–] chaogomu@lemmy.world 16 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Same company, their newest cells are based on that tech, but with 7 years of advances, so 360Wh/kg. Which is about the same as most other top end Lithium-ion batteries, just solid-state rather than a liquid electrolyte.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] AI_toothbrush@lemmy.zip 83 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

Really, how is that possible? The company making absolutely ridiculous claims that are in no way possible and are instantly a red flag for anyone whos ever touched tech with a 20 foot pole instantly sees is lying about there mystical miracle tech?

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 41 points 2 weeks ago (6 children)

The problem is there are multiple tech companies involved, all bullshitting each other. It starts with a German screening technology company claiming they can screen produce the solid state electrode, when they never made a single battery ever. if company A can develop the tech then company B can assemble the battery to do into the motorcycles in company C.

Formula E racing uses the state of the art in batteries, and for 2027 they sourced a lithium battery even though cost was no object.

Two Chinese companies claim to be making solid state batteries, put the performance is only equal to classic lithium.

Toyota got burned on this. They were promised SS batteries delivered by 2025. Never happened.

[–] mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works 12 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Donut Labs was also looking for funding from a large number of smaller investors, none of which had the knowledge or capability to really look into what was going on

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Reygle@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Critical thinking is a dying concept. Most of humanity has no concept of reality any more. There area few points of hope in the younger generation but it's not looking promising from where I'm sitting.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] kn33@lemmy.world 63 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I'm not surprised, but I am disappointed

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] HugeNerd@lemmy.ca 57 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

3D printed quantum solid state AI fusion reactors on asteroids is the future!

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

What no nanobots? What sort of product is this.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] utopiah@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Fueled by FSD SpaceX xAI. /$

I bet someone from HN is already "generating" that brilliant idea thanks to their SOTA meta-harness right now using Claude Fable. Or something.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] DannyMac@sh.itjust.works 39 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Can for once something too good to be true actually be true? :(

[–] Naz@sh.itjust.works 21 points 1 week ago

Well, the original Li-Ion batteries by John Goodenough are Goodenough

We just need a Dr. John BetterBatteryMan for solid battery tech

[–] 4am@lemmy.zip 32 points 2 weeks ago (6 children)

Dang, was just seeing a bunch of YT vids popping up about this, how it was going to be big if true.

If they are really a fraud, how did they think they wouldn’t get caught??

[–] ExcessShiv@lemmy.dbzer0.com 55 points 2 weeks ago

They didn't need to keep it secret forever, just long enough to grab more money.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 18 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

If they are really a fraud, how did they think they wouldn’t get caught??

That's how Ponzi schemes work. See this thing?

Under $50,000! All carbon fiber! Solar powered! 1,600 km range!

This thing has been vaporware since 2009, company started 20 YEARS AGO -4,000 suckers signed up.

It went chapter 11 in 2011.

Bought by a Chinese company, " company stated it would manufacture 5000 vehicles by the end of 2012".

total to date: 0.

On December 8, 2020, the company presented a driveable prototype and started accepting reservations. By December 14 the company had over 3000 refundable preorders for $100 each. Aptera released its 2021 annual report in May 2022, stating they had 103 employees and over 18,000 reservations for their solar electric vehicle. By mid 2022, the company raised a total of $40 million, planning to get to production by the end of the year.They acquired three buildings in Carlsbad, California, with a combined space of over 100,000 sq ft (9,300 m2). In November 2022 Aptera announced they have redesigned the structural components of the vehicle, and it requires more funding before they can get to production.

total to date: 0.

Aptera announced in April 2025 the company raised a total of $130 million through crowdfunding and $10 million from other investors, and the company requires an additional $60 million before it can start low-volume production.

total to date: 0.

Aptera announced in March 2026 it has raised a further $17M, and plans starting low-scale production no earlier than March 2027 pending raising a further $50 million.

It just goes on and on and no one is questioning the utter bullshit claims of range and solar charging and the lack of a single vehicle in 20 years.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aptera_Motors

But when Elizabeth Holmes did this...straight to jail.

Now in 2026, there are serious safety concerns about vehicles that look like cars but are actually motorcycles. There is a Federal bill to ban these on the table.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ImgurRefugee114@reddthat.com 13 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works 8 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

If you find out about something through YouTube ad, that’s all the proof you need that it’s a scam

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Adderbox76@lemmy.ca 22 points 1 week ago

Ah....the Theranos business plan.

[–] Kn1ghtDigital@lemmy.zip 19 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Does this mean the technology is impossible at current then? Or just that the company didn't deliver?

[–] Some_Emo_Chick@lemmy.world 21 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

There are several companies making great leaps right now. It is still far from commercially viable yet.

Which is why it seemed so far fetched for Donut to claim they had this battery without anyone knowing they were working on it. It was immediately suspicious.

[–] cogitase@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 2 weeks ago

It is still far from commercially viable yet.

Solid-state sodium is still in the laboratory stage. People assumed Donut was claiming to have developed a solid-state sodium battery due to their "no lithium" statement, but they never specifically claimed they were using sodium.

All solid-state lithium is a bit further along. Korea has pilot plants producing full-sized EV batteries that are being used for testing before they do the final scale up to production. Chinese manufacturers are also basically at the same stage. Those will likely be available in production EVs by 2030.

[–] Xanvial@lemmy.world 13 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Just this company that didn't deliver. There's still a lot of other companies doing research for solid state battery

[–] sunnie@slrpnk.net 8 points 2 weeks ago

Who will all have a harder time finding investor money and will meet with more skepticism as development proceeds.

Like all other aspects of our greedy scam culture, the possibility of this new battery chemistry and some of the remaining social trust has been monetized and traded for cash to line somebody’s pockets.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] W98BSoD@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

“There’s a problem loading the page.”

Yeah, your overly intrusive advertising.

http://archive.is/UsPCy

[–] ulkesh@piefed.social 16 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

I'm shocked, I tell you. SHOCKED!

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 10 points 2 weeks ago (6 children)

That's the electricity in action.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] AaronR@lemmy.world 15 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)
[–] SnoringEarthworm@sh.itjust.works 11 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] londos@lemmy.world 13 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Who knew donuts had holes?

[–] realitista@lemmus.org 11 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Well we all had high hopes, but if something looks too good to be true, it probably is.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MadMadBunny@lemmy.ca 7 points 2 weeks ago
load more comments
view more: next ›