this post was submitted on 14 Jun 2026
259 points (97.1% liked)

Technology

85463 readers
4049 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The targeted women included heads of state, first ladies, royalty, legislators, government officials, journalists, TV presenters, athletes, entertainers, and other public figures.

Investigators said users could browse material by tags including "rape," "forced," "degradation," and "slave." Those categories are a big reason why prosecutors framed the case as abuse and exploitation rather than a copyright or impersonation dispute.

all 49 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] answersplease77@lemmy.world 10 points 11 hours ago

The Epestien defenders do not care about raped women and children in real life.. cmon. 100% This happened because that website had one of their celebrity friends pics.

[–] Archimedes@sh.itjust.works 11 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

We didn't need all that Margaret Thatcher stuff anyway

[–] mechoman444@lemmy.world 6 points 10 hours ago

Speak for yourself dude.

[–] ivanafterall@lemmy.world 5 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

I thought we didn't yuck people's yums here? I'm glad I saved the series with her and Gorbachev, at least.

[–] Archimedes@sh.itjust.works 4 points 11 hours ago

I heard there's a fabled "trickle down set" featuring Ronald Reagan but it was too raunchy for the Economist.

[–] favoredponcho@lemmy.zip 9 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (1 children)

I’m just curious what law this violates. You can argue it’s weird or creepy or morally bad, and I’m not going to dispute it, but I’m just wondering how it’s against the law?

[–] kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world 2 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (2 children)
[–] winkerjadams@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 17 hours ago

Just post the real link next time. Every time you use one of those quick share links you are being tracked by Google/Facebook/etc

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TAKE_IT_DOWN_Act

[–] lastlybutfirstly@lemmy.world 5 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

This seems like it violates the first amendment. This means that it's illegal now to create a satirical image of Trump getting raped by Vance. Or vice versa.

Edit:

Come to think of it, that South Park episode with a naked AI trump is illegal.

[–] PalmTreeIsBestTree@lemmy.world 29 points 1 day ago (3 children)

How about we ban AI from making child porn please

[–] EliteCloneMike@lemmy.zip 11 points 22 hours ago

Also, ban AI from also falsely accusing people of having CSAM. Such as what Google and Meta do when it comes to innocent family photos.

[–] zarkanian@sh.itjust.works 39 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] pennomi@lemmy.world 135 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Nice, maybe we should also seize any AI sites being used to generate sexual images of minors.

Oh no wait, it’s okay if you’re a trillionaire, carry on.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 2 points 18 hours ago

especially a trillionaire that hangs out of with ms "kungfu lady", who arranges "sessions" with minors.

[–] Eldritch@piefed.world 7 points 1 day ago

Aaw damn. And here I was hoping that they had seized Twitter.

[–] inb4_FoundTheVegan@lemmy.world 104 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Good. Great. Awesome.

Yet only the rich get protection, the everyday girls and women have to see their artificial nudes on X while trying to avoid their coworkers and classmates laughing about it. Two tiered justice.

[–] kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world 9 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (1 children)

That's just not true, though. This case involves famous people, yes. But the first conviction under the TAKE IT DOWN act, which was passed in May 2025, was only passed down just two months ago in April. It involved no famous people at all. It was an Ohio man who was using AI to make pornographic images of local people in his neighborhood, adults and children, and posting them online on a CSAM promoting site.

Link to related article: https://www.10tv.com/article/news/local/columbus-man-first-convicted-take-it-down-act-pleads-guilty-cybercrimes/530-fff42eac-4089-49ce-847b-0597c8a8fe39

Enforcement under this act is just getting the ball rolling. I expect there will be much more news of it soon.

[–] brem@lemmy.world 48 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Please tell me this applies to Grok

[–] GenosseFlosse@feddit.org 7 points 1 day ago

Well let's all have grok generate the same images, share them on x and find out.

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 day ago (2 children)

"Deepfake" meaning low-effort Photoshop, generally.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 11 hours ago

Photoshop

What year do you think it is?

[–] winkerjadams@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 17 hours ago

They are full on videos. Thats not just photoshop

[–] dil@piefed.zip 21 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Ive noticed they only take down stuff for politicians not underage actors or celebs or influencers or ppl in general, but anything nsfw about politicians is swiftly taken down even on reddit

[–] WatDabney@sopuli.xyz 23 points 1 day ago

It doesn't get much more performative than that.

[–] spacegoat@lemmy.world -3 points 1 day ago

Waste of resources