I know. We should totally invoke the 25th amendment before- wait. It said AI. Oh, my bad.
this post was submitted on 24 Jun 2026
285 points (97.3% liked)
Technology
85745 readers
4634 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
It's a real sign of our times that so many can not differentiate between a plagiarism fueled talking machine and a thinking machine.
Worked in tech for 15 years (been mostly out for 7 now) and most of the higher ups were just plagiarism word salad morons. That’s why the same management thinks these harbors are so smart.
I’m happier being poor than dealing with those fucking morons.
Well, in fairness, if you ask Chatgpt a question it says "...thinking..."
You can see how confusion might occur.
load more comments
(4 replies)
sanitation — 'classic psychology test' covers a lot of ground. If this is Stroop or dual-task paradigms, the near-total collapse actually tracks: those tests were designed to stress automaticity vs. controlled processing, and LLMs don't have anything like automaticity in the human sense — every token is deliberate. So 'collapse' might be the wrong word; it's more like the architecture was never built for that cognitive mode. There's a breakdown of which test categories hit which model families hardest if you want to cross-reference which paradigm is doing the most damage here.
Given that the LLMs could follow the short lists of words well but not the longer lists, and that they were processing images, not text, I think it's more likely that their context just filled up and they forgot the original instructions (or they were assigned a lower weight in the computation).
load more comments
(1 replies)
Might be because AI isn't cognitive or actually intelligent. I imagine a washing machine wouldn't do well either.
load more comments
(11 replies)
The ability to 'override automatic responses and maintain complex goals' is why we get up at six in the morning to go to a meeting we already know the outcome of and frankly I am not sure its something that is working for us.
Demand work from home, if you don't get it, keep looking until you do... Favorite part of my work from home day is getting in the shower and having breakfast with my wife after the morning BS meeting.
The shower seems an odd place for having breakfast, but I guess if your wife is ok with it…
Maybe in a fjord instead?
One positive of AI is that the ownership class is getting a lesson in just how complex, flexible, reliable, and capable "unskilled" workers are. You can watch them realize in real time that a model capable of running a dinner-rush drive-thru would be a trillion dollar quantum leap.
“unskilled” workers
They quit calling them that years ago, now they are "lower value human capital." https://fortune.com/2026/05/26/standard-chartered-ceo-bill-winters-apologizes-calling-some-workers-lower-value-human-capital-ai-push/
load more comments
(1 replies)
Tech bro psyops from psypost.
Feels like one of the important aspects would be realizing one of our biggest incentives has and always will be fear of death. Not to mention our desire to compete to get attention and a sense of fulfillment. Lastly our ability to ignore our ability to suppress knowing reality that we’re all going to die and be beaten by someone else eventually, and the ability to accept it and keep waking up each day.
load more comments
(42 replies)
view more: next ›