this post was submitted on 02 Jul 2026
486 points (99.4% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

40598 readers
3529 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 2) 31 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] cannedtuna@lemmy.world 19 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

As everyone else has said, that’s clean as fuck.

I see ya’ll put the room numbers on the front of the patch panel instead of the cable labels. What kind of facility is this in if you don’t mind me asking? Is this a hospital?

[–] victorz@lemmy.world 96 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

That cable management looks pretty clean tho

[–] rounding_error@lemmy.today 73 points 19 hours ago (3 children)

They have cable management rules to prevent chaos from happening, which will if given the opportunity

[–] peripheralneuropathy@lemmy.world 27 points 14 hours ago (4 children)
[–] PattyMcB@lemmy.world 12 points 13 hours ago

I've cleaned one of those out once. Went from 10base-T to 100base-T in the building.

Fuck I'm old

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 9 hours ago

Looks like that one room from Legends of the Hidden Temple lol

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] icelimit@lemmy.ml 13 points 15 hours ago

That's some decent cabling

[–] devaly@ani.social 37 points 19 hours ago (4 children)

Too late OP, now I know where you live

[–] altphoto@lemmy.today 1 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

Is this all we are? Just a bunch of nerds...some of who like to be naked and do naughty stuff...? Just out to figure out where the others live? 😞😕.

Recently I was able to identify where a porno was shot.... down in Brazil! WTF. I didn't tell anyone where. One day in the distant future I might be able to travel there so I too can claim fame. But why do we do it? We do we try to dox people?

[–] PattyMcB@lemmy.world 4 points 13 hours ago

For teh lulz. DUHH

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] kablez@lemmy.world 7 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

If I were in the middle of something and that laptop did that to me, it would now be a two piece laptop.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] tormeh@discuss.tchncs.de 25 points 19 hours ago (4 children)

I don't like Windows, but at the point where the laptop updates automatically hasn't it been bugging you about the update for hours or even days? I generally file complaints about bad update timings in the "fucked around and found out" folder

[–] rounding_error@lemmy.today 46 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)

Honestly I don’t even remember, this was a long time ago, but if I recall the shitass Dell computer I was given had an SSD that repeatedly disconnected and required a forced reboot. Updates were managed automatically by the org so I don’t think I was ever prompted to update during my short time there. When I powered the shitter on Windows decided it was apparently a good time to update.

[–] mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca 15 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

nope. it can just come out of nowhere sometimes.

[–] Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 16 hours ago

Not in the EU region lol

[–] Takapapatapaka@tarte.nuage-libre.fr 19 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (3 children)

I mean, shouldn't you be able to refuse updates anyway ? Like if there is something you don't like or that will break your workflow in the update, shouldn't you be able to accept the risks and keep the old version indefinitely ?

Edit : a word was missing.

[–] spitfire@lemmy.world 2 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

No, because devices need to be compliant, there needs to be an unskipable deadline. Otherwise everyone would just defer.

[–] Takapapatapaka@tarte.nuage-libre.fr 1 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

Do they really imperatively need to be compliant ? (i genuinely don't know, but it seems weird to me, it feels like i can just postpone updates indefinitely on linux)

Or is this that it's way better to be compliant, so companies need to enforce it on their computers (but individuals may not have this need) ?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] mumblerfish@lemmy.world 4 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Companies lock out the computer because it is lacking updates rather than have it working. Apple broke ssh on all their macs with an update for three months or so. Managed to postpone it for a while until the called and said I have to update or be locked out. Luckily I had postponed it for so long that the next update arrived just like a week later.

[–] Takapapatapaka@tarte.nuage-libre.fr 1 points 8 hours ago (3 children)

When you say "companies", do you mean Apple/Microsoft or the company you're working for/with ?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] CompactFlax@discuss.tchncs.de 14 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

No, not on a business owned device. The updates should give warnings, of course. Some companies don’t seem to know how to supply those warnings before mandating the install, for some reason.

[–] Zarobi@aussie.zone 6 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

The admins are not InTune with the latest technology

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Jesus_666@lemmy.world 5 points 16 hours ago

My company uses a third-party deployment platform that gives you dialog with a 60 minute countdown and a button to start immediately. And I think the deployment dialog can't pop up if you're not on the computer. Because nobody likes nonsense like five minute countdowns that can start while the screen is locked.

[–] OwOarchist@pawb.social 11 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Still, though, I prefer an OS where I can fuck around in that regard and not find out.

[–] Anivia@feddit.org 4 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

It really is a situation where you can't make everyone happy. If you don't force users to update eventually you get situations like WannaCry, where millions of PCs get hit by ransomware exploiting a vulnerability that was patched two months ago

[–] OwOarchist@pawb.social 3 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

It really is a situation where you can’t make everyone happy.

Well, you could make a lot more people happy by making the update process less invasive.

It's particularly egregious that Windows not only needs to restart to apply updates (sometimes multiple times), but that these update restarts take much longer than normal restarts. Even if a Linux distro did force you to update, it still wouldn't be as problematic, because Linux can update in the background, without interrupting you -- and if it needs a restart in order to apply those updates, the restart doesn't take any longer than restarting the computer normally. You never come across the uniquely Windows issue of "I can't use my computer at all for the next 45 minutes because it's updating."

If the Windows update process wasn't so invasive and debilitating, people might not put it off so much. (Also, if people could trust that Windows updates would actually make their computer better, rather than worse... When you use forced updates to arbitrarily change user settings, to push spyware and bloatware, to shall we say strongly encourage the use of features that nobody asked for ... well, of course that makes people reluctant to update.)

[–] Sprocketfree@sh.itjust.works 2 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

This. I never got why ios or Ms can't take this route. It's insane to not just update the files on disk then reboot. I'd like to think there's a technical reason that couldn't do this but considering it's ms I'm not sure that's why.

[–] OwOarchist@pawb.social 1 points 8 hours ago

I’d like to think there’s a technical reason that couldn’t do this but considering it’s ms I’m not sure that’s why.

Probably because of their fucking dinosaur of a filesystem. NTFS was created in fucking 1993. And 33 years later, it's still not only the default filesystem for Windows, but (barring certain very niche exceptions) it's still the most modern and most advanced filesystem Windows is capable of using!

How is a company with resources like Microsoft incapable of developing and introducing a new filesystem? Or, hell, there's nothing stopping them from just adopting and supporting one of the many better open-source filesystems out there.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›