this post was submitted on 06 Jun 2025
31 points (97.0% liked)

Technology

2976 readers
524 users here now

Which posts fit here?

Anything that is at least tangentially connected to the technology, social media platforms, informational technologies and tech policy.


Post guidelines

[Opinion] prefixOpinion (op-ed) articles must use [Opinion] prefix before the title.


Rules

1. English onlyTitle and associated content has to be in English.
2. Use original linkPost URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
3. Respectful communicationAll communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. InclusivityEveryone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacksAny kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangentsStay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may applyIf something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.


Companion communities

!globalnews@lemmy.zip
!interestingshare@lemmy.zip


Icon attribution | Banner attribution


If someone is interested in moderating this community, message @brikox@lemmy.zip.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I asked teachers to tell me how AI has changed how they teach.

The response from teachers and university professors was overwhelming. In my entire career, I’ve rarely gotten so many email responses to a single article, and I have never gotten so many thoughtful and comprehensive responses.

One thing is clear: teachers are not OK.

They describe trying to grade “hybrid essays half written by students and half written by robots,” trying to teach Spanish to kids who don’t know the meaning of the words they’re trying to teach them in English, and students who use AI in the middle of conversation. They describe spending hours grading papers that took their students seconds to generate: “I've been thinking more and more about how much time I am almost certainly spending grading and writing feedback for papers that were not even written by the student,” one teacher told me. “That sure feels like bullshit.”

top 4 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Aquila@sh.itjust.works 7 points 2 days ago

It was pretty obvious during the pandemic teachers weren’t ok. It hasn’t improved since then

[–] irotsoma@lemmy.blahaj.zone -1 points 2 days ago

This sounds like the same complaints math teachers had when pocket sized books or calculators or web search or many other technologies started becoming ubiquitous. And the same answer is true, these are tools they will have in the real world. It's just as useful to learn to use tools as it is to learn to do the thing without tools. Test them without the tools available for those things they need to know from memory and with the tools for everything else. Make the tests, essays, etc. so the tools aren't able to do the entire set of work in the test.

Wasn't as big of a problem when text books helped with this like making lots of math problems that calculators couldn't solve in a dongle step. The real issue is that textbook manufacturing consolidation has made text books fairly useless, so teachers are left to craft their own lessons if they want them to be worthwhile. And they don't have time to create their own lessons from scratch because of some aspects of our education systems that are too much to go into here.

[–] gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de -5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Well i think that western society has a lot of problems, and one of the grave ones is the moralizing stance that "knowledge is good" that was taken over from christianity. In christianity, the bird represents knowledge, and in the story of the world's creation, the snake (which represents lust) walks up to the human, scares the bird sitting in the holy tree away, and that causes disaster. Ever since then, christianity has condemned lust and favoured knowledge.

We still have that attitude in our society. Children are trimmed into going to school, after that going to more school, after that going to even more school. Young people spend 18 years of their life in school. Children are told as long as they study, they're going to have good prospects on the job market. And now all of that comes crashing down when AI replaces white-collar workers. That's part of the crisis.

The solution would of course be to develop true (proper) far-sightedness and develop plans and lifestyle for the next 10000 years.

[–] Jax@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 days ago

condemned lust and favored knowledge

Well, at least in the U.S. - what you're saying is fucking dumb. If anything, the exact opposite has been shown with sex becoming more and more shared and knowledge/wisdom being attacked at every vector.

The solution would of course be to develop true (proper) far-sightedness and develop plans and lifestyle for the next 10000 years.

I must be misunderstanding something, please explain how you get to 'true far-sightedness' without knowledge? Because your words imply that you think it's lust.