this post was submitted on 09 Jul 2026
814 points (98.6% liked)

Gaming

7923 readers
708 users here now

!gaming is a community for gaming noobs through gaming aficionados. Unlike !games, we don’t take ourselves quite as serious. Shitposts and memes are welcome.

Our Rules:

1. Keep it civil.


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only.


2. No sexism, racism, homophobia, transphobia or any other flavor of bigotry.


I should not need to explain this one.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Try not to repost anything posted within the past month.


Beyond that, go for it. Not everyone is on every site all the time.



Logo uses joystick by liftarn

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
814
Launch already! (media.piefed.world)
submitted 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) by The_Picard_Maneuver@piefed.world to c/gaming@lemmy.world
 
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ModernRisk@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The only launcher (if it is?) I will allow is Steam. Other wise just won’t play the game or 🏴‍☠️.

[–] BionicBeaver3000@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

I tolerate both steam and heroic. I can see how a launcher is useful for centralized library management (updates and reinstallation), but I also see how it is a lot of concentrated attention and potential adspace / datamining tool.

I tolerate steam because they have good features & an okay track record, and heroic because I want to receive the free epic games but do not want to give them real estate on my pc.

[–] infinitesunrise@slrpnk.net 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Not really a thing on Linux AFAIK, but that would be an instant refund for me if it happened.

[–] Dave@lemmy.nz 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It's absolutely a thing when running Windows games on Linux. Though sometimes you can skip it with a launch option, thank god for protondb.

[–] infinitesunrise@slrpnk.net 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Oh duh that's right, sometimes I forget that I proactively swore off games like that around the time I ditched Windows, rather than they just stopped being a thing.

Boycott app launchers and kernel-level anticheat, kids!

[–] GregorGizeh@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 day ago (2 children)

One game i can sort of excuse it is stellaris, where you can configure your modlist in the launcher. That does save a ton of loading time when you tinker with your shit and need to restart a couple times.

[–] deegeese@sopuli.xyz 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Nope. The mod bundle known as Rimworld does this just fine without launcher trash, and Paradox is not one of the good ones.

[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Rimworld has no native mod manager, and TBH editing it in game is slow and clunky. You can edit the XML file, but this is true of many games.

Of course one can use RimSort, but that’s a 3rd party fan project. It’s not really fair to expect every game to have a good one.

[–] deegeese@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The point is that even Rimworld, an extremely mod heavy game, handles this just fine without forcing a publisher’s launcher on its players.

[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Well, because it was originally sold as a DRM free game.

handles this just fine

But I would dispute this. I'm working out a modlist right now, and I'd be pulling my hair out if I had to do it in game, or manually with the XML file + mod IDs.

[–] The_Picard_Maneuver@piefed.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yeah, I forgive XCOM for the same reason. Launchers are helpful for mod-heavy games.

[–] Routhinator@startrek.website 4 points 1 day ago

A launcher is still unnecessary here. The menu of the game is as much a launcher as game assets and mods do not need to be loaded at the menu, and the menu can be designed to serve this function with immersive design instead of hostile design.

Most launchers exist to inject web content so they can advertise to you without needing you to update the launcher.

[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

It’s annoying, I hate it. They’re useless bloat.

But it’s never risen to the level of “I literally will not buy/play the game over this.”

I don’t get people who say this at all. You buy this cool game you love, you’ll spend hours playing it, but you won’t enter a fake email and wait another 30 seconds at launch to play it?

Even at the peak of Origin’s woes, I never got close to that.

[–] Allero@lemmy.today 11 points 1 day ago

It's yet another program you didn't choose collecting whatever data from your computer, and yet another - very intentional - obstacle to the gaming experience. Honestly, it's less about time and more about artificial obstructions and privacy invasion everywhere.

It is particularly egregious when studios who normally side with the gamers, like CDPR, do the same thing with their games.

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

But it’s never risen to the level of “I literally will not buy/play the game over this.”

I couldn't play Mirrors Edge once, because the fucking launcher (what was it, EA?) triggered the opened-files-limit of Linux. 3D games ran fine before that.

[–] Axolotl_cpp@feddit.it 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

opened-files-limit of Linux

It has one? How much stuff did it open 😭

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

/etc/security/limits.conf. I think default is usually in the 1000s? Of simultanously opened files.

[–] Axolotl_cpp@feddit.it 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Ok wtf? What the heck is EA doing

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›