4grams

joined 2 years ago
[–] 4grams@awful.systems 1 points 20 hours ago

which is a nonconformist

Thank you for this, it puts it in terms that make a lot of sense. This really helps explain a phenomenon I see so often. I know a few folks who are certainly not pro-trump, but are very anti-political. I’ve been told that I need to shut up, and things would be fine once the next election rolls around.

These folks might not like what’s happening, but they are fine conforming to it.

Maybe it’s a me problem, but I think it’s going to take a little more work than the bare minimum.

[–] 4grams@awful.systems 11 points 1 week ago

I like 'sloppers' as a term for the morons distrubing and consuming the shit that the clankers are excreting.

[–] 4grams@awful.systems 2 points 2 weeks ago

I honestly think they would put the pedal to the metal. But I also think without the cult of personality, it will fall apart real fast. Only problem is, no idea who victors in that power vacuum…

[–] 4grams@awful.systems 6 points 2 weeks ago

Underrated comment :)

[–] 4grams@awful.systems 7 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

I think I've eaten at a cracker barrel twice, both times were on a roadtrip and it was the most established place off an interstate exit, so purely convenience. I haven't the first clue what they even offer, I just assume it's all chicken fried and covered with gravy.

That there are people out there absolutely losing their mind over the logo change is one of the most confusing things I've ever seen. Who. Fucking. Cares? Goddamn, the group that likes to call everyone else a snowflake, sure is the most infantile people on earth.

That said, I'll avoid cracker barrel from here on. I really don't want to be near the sort of people who frequent that establishment. Kudos to them for so proudly self-identifying...

[–] 4grams@awful.systems 2 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

I rest my case.

[–] 4grams@awful.systems 0 points 2 weeks ago (7 children)

You come across as a “well ackchyually” dipshit. You might think you are making a point, but think this one through, is it a good one in this context? Is it even a good one at all?

[–] 4grams@awful.systems 17 points 2 weeks ago

I have noticed that some of the regular creators I watch seem to look a little AI lately. I honestly have been questioning reality a bit; that’s probably the point.

[–] 4grams@awful.systems 80 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

Fucking hilarious that this is party that starts seizing the means of production.

It was never, ever even once about states rights. It was never about fighting communism. It’s all racism, always has been.

[–] 4grams@awful.systems 44 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

My relatives who’ve been screaming about mark of the beast and shit for years sure confuse the hell Out of me when they voice support for this while wearing their maga hats.

[–] 4grams@awful.systems 3 points 3 weeks ago

I always assumed it was a lasso.

[–] 4grams@awful.systems 73 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (4 children)

I can’t help but feel like this is the most important part of the article:

The model's refusal to accept information to the contrary, meanwhile, is no doubt rooted in the safety mechanisms OpenAI was so keen to bake in, in order to protect against prompt engineering and injection attacks.

Do any of you believe that these “safety mechanisms” are there just for safety? If they can control ai, they will. This is how we got mecha-hitler, same mucking about with weights and such, not just what it was trained on.

They WILL, they already are, trying to control how ai “thinks”. This is why it’s desperately important to whatever we can to democratize ai. People have already decided that ai has all the answers, and folks like peter thiel now have the single most potent propaganda machine in history.

view more: next ›