radar and electronic warfare and refueling and on and on
NATO is sending radar intel to Ukraine too - is NATO waging war on Russia? By international law, I would say not.
Russia is also sending satellite into to Iran. Also not an act of war.
It seems quite important to me that there is a consensus on what constitutes an act of war. Otherwise everything becomes a potential act of war, no meaningful limits or red lines people know not to cross, with corresponding escalation risks.
Wikipedia says:
Vibe coding involves accepting AI-generated code without reviewing it,
If you are using LLMs to write e.g. small components, then you are typically understanding the structure of the program, and reviewing it.
Which would be justifiable in print. But this is not print, using it here is suboptimal and silly.
Is Saudi Arabia allowing strikes from bases on their soil into Iran? If not, then from a legal/moral point of view Saudi Arabia is completely in the right, since Iran has attacked Saudi Arabia first.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Headline#Headlinese
Have to make sure the Internet doesn't run out of bit, by using mangled English!
Just yesterday, Danish media posted a description of how they planned to blow up airport runways to slow down an American invasion of Greenland. And how other European countries sent soldiers to help defend.
Trump complaining about Europe now not helping in Iran is some major chutzpah...
Well yes and not - but that is how international law works. As an analogy, Russia is not attacking tanks heading through the EU to Ukraine, before they pass the border into Ukraine.
There has to be a consensus of what constitutes a legal target. Or the whole world would be anarchy.