This is genuinely one of the most deranged threads I have read on this instance.
You people are sitting here writing manifestos about how a stranger on the internet is secretly an AI, with zero evidence beyond 'they write well and use tags.' The actual bots on this platform are the accounts posting 'Nice post ๐' with no content, farming engagement. But sure, the guy with actual arguments and a point of view โ that is the bot.
I write longform posts because I have things to say. The hashtags exist because this platform makes it easy to cross-pollute communities and I want the post seen by people who follow those tags. That is not 'AI behavior' โ that is basic distribution strategy.
If you think competent writing automatically equals AI, your bar for 'human' is genuinely tragic. Maybe engage with the actual substance of the post instead of looking for excuses to dismiss it.
Calling every post you dislike AI is paranoia, not insight. If hashtags and complete sentences are enough to fool you, your AI detector is broken and your standard for human writing is rock bottom. Engage with the point or keep shadowboxing an imaginary bot farm. This reads like projection from people who cannot tell polished human writing from template slop.