AnchoriteMagus

Unless he's fleeing DC a couple steps ahead of a mob with torches and pitchforks, he ain't worried enough.

It does not.

Anything that transmits a signal can be found, just get that out of the way immediately. The only way to be 100% untraceable is to never transmit.

Mesh networks, however, are pretty safe. Triangulating the origin of a mesh transmission will just lead to the repeater node which, admittedly is a pain in the dick if they kill the repeater and the network goes dark, but it doesn't lead directly back to a person, just a box they stuck on a cell tower or up on a hill somewhere.

Yup. You definitely have no idea how treaties or international relations work.

I get that it's scary that the US is doing it, but this is far from the first time world leaders have blustered about wanting territory that wasn't theirs.

The international community didn't support preemptive action even when 50,000 troops were massed on Ukrainian borders, they're not going to do it when a single US combat asset hasn't moved towards Greenland yet, and not a single policy decision has been enacted.

Edit- don't get me wrong, if we start blockading Greenland, massing naval and amphibious forces, or building up ground units on the base in Greenland, then absolutely bomb the shit out of them, but the international community will never support action before that. It's ludicrous to think they would.

........because the last window of opportunity for anticipatory self-defense has been repeatedly ruled by the international community to not extend that far?

Troops massing at borders is precisely the situation that the last window of opportunity is referring to.

I'm starting to think you don't actually know the statutes involved or their previous legal cases, because if you did you'd know your "argument" is completely worthless.

They're shooting them in the face with birdshot. It's very small and is much less likely to penetrate into body cavities or break bone, but causes extensive soft tissue damage. This is intended to maim people.

I don't know about now, but when my parents were in school it was definitely very common. There is still no law against corporal punishment in private schools in the US, and only 33 out of 50 states have laws against it in their public schools.

Whine harder, techboy.

He sees his future financial ruin rushing towards him like a freight train, and he's starting to panic.

When CEOs beg you to be nicer to their products, you know they're in trouble.

He admitted the emergency exit was locked. When they unlocked it after the fire, there were patrons bodies piled up in front of it.

His negligence absolutely contributed to those people's deaths.

Anyone who can so readily throw out the principle of anticipatory self defense knows that isn't a "last window of opportunity" scenario.

Why do you want Denmark to break the law so badly?

There's a vast difference in killing someone in combat 20 years ago and shooting a widowed mother of 3 in the face during a traffic stop.

I don't honestly care if you agree with me or not, but a large portion of why progressivism / anticapitalism feels like such an unsupported cause is because so many of you are militantly opposed to the idea of personal change.

"He was a tool of the oppressor 20 years ago, so he's tainted for life!" is not how you build support.

Prove that Graham Platner murdered anyone.

Prove that he ever shot someone in the face in direct violation of his training or the law.