Seems more efficient to express this kind of guidelines publicly, especially for words as common nowadays as "bro"
I doesn't seem like keeping the approach private would have changed much anyway, you would have reached to someone else, who would have ignored you to see if you were serious with it, then that person would have created a report similar to this one.
I didn't put you on blast, I provided context of previous events, including the ban reversals.
We are probably going to disagree here, but messaging people about using a word as common as "bro" today and threatening them from a ban if they reiterate doesn't really seem kind or gentle.
Messages sent to users from mods threatening them from being banned should be allowed to be made public, as bans should be related to a rule, and rules should be public.
I've been on the other side of power tripping, on a movies community no less, so wouldn't be so categoric about "stand up for the mod".
https://lemmy.zip/post/25898384?scrollToComments=true
Tl,dr: power tripping mod perma banned me from a community I built, instance admin didn't want to intervene as it was against their admin policy. It took me months to rebuild that community elsewhere, and that's probably why I'm very cautious with power tripping mods since then.
Being a mod on Piefed/Lemmy requires more transparency than on other platforms due to the transparency of the mod actions and the federated nature of the platform.
Users here have choices between several versions of the same community, they will usually avoid the ones where the mods are enforcing what they perceive as arbitrary decisions.
Harassment is never a good thing, but mods are also accountable for their actions.
If you have doubts about how your rules or actions will be perceived, feel free to ask on !fedigrow@lemmy.zip where other mods can discuss it with you.