CTDummy

joined 3 weeks ago
[–] CTDummy@piefed.social 21 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Not sure I agree with some of the assertion made there but regardless thanks for the reply. I look forward to checking it out.

[–] CTDummy@piefed.social 12 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (5 children)

Looks interesting, was AI used in any of this?

[–] CTDummy@piefed.social 3 points 1 week ago

It should be

It is somewhat but it may need to be revised.

Section 93ZAA of the Crimes Act, which took effect in August, makes it an offence to publicly incite hatred towards another person or group on the grounds of race.

Spot on with the rest though. These shit heels are specialised at weaselling their foot into doors.

[–] CTDummy@piefed.social 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

No argument here. Even if they didn’t; the moment they realise it was a rally of dudes clad in all black with their faces covered spouting bs; they should have issued move on orders. Yep, it violates the inciting racial hatred act. It’s worth pointing out that maybe it “slipped passed them” but my doubting that aside, incompetence is not a defence; as any cop will tell you.

The commissioner said he would review that decision and added he did not know the protest was taking place due to an internal "communication error", and that he had failed to brief the government.

ABC.

[–] CTDummy@piefed.social 11 points 1 week ago (5 children)

Yeah whoever approved this needs to be sacked. Pro Palestine protests get scrutinised but literal nazis get approved. Get fucked.