But are they self sealing?
Count042
So freedom of speech shouldn't allow people to say that apartheid South Africa shouldn't exist? That Nazi Germany shouldn't be allowed to exist?
I can remember when opposing apartheid ethnostates was the correct moral opinion.
What happened?
What makes Israel different?
Or are double standards proof of anti semitism only when they're negative?
EDIT: No response needed from moral cowards that would have protected apartheid South Africa, Belgium Congo, or Nazi Germany from criticism that they should not be allowed to exist.
You probably won't read this, but things like this are EXACTLY why freedom of speech exists.
You would have condemned Nat Turner and justified slavery.
You've been denying every bit of that and been explicitly pro-israel to the point of deleting pro Palestinian comments over non-existent rules violations over in the news community.
I remember you defending the Sde Teiman torture-rape camp when the videos first came to light.
I find it impossible to believe someone, let alone a biased moderator of News, that defended Sde Teiman would find anything disturbing.
P.S. tags are fun.
A statement that makes it clear you haven't paid attention go Libya since NATO destroyed it.
Maybe they'll do a better job than NATO.
Can't get much worse.
Germanies legal definition of antisemitism includes criticism of Israel.
I'm also using this, and it works.
I'm enjoying how the obvious rebuttal to this stupid propaganda talking point is now so widespread I don't have to say it anymore.
Bibi has been the head of the government in Israel for twenty something years and ran a pretty rightwing and harsh genocidal apartheid regime.
You don't beat them by being them.
You also don't win by lying about Obama assassinating American Citizens intentionally.
https://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/07/world/middleeast/07yemen.html?hp
But, by all means, please continue lying.
You may be mistaking him for one of his children whom we've also killed.
It absolutely was targeted.
Why are you saying it wasn't?
You make up people calling for a Jewish genocide in this thread, but you still can't bring yourself to use the word Genocide for the state that set up torture rape camps that they used to rape doctors to death.
Why the double standard? Why does calling for a single state with equal rights for citizens constitute calling for a genocide, but you can't call the country that has bombed and destroyed every hospital and school while continuing to block all access to food genocidal?
Why the double standard?