You're more respectful then the person you are responding to deserves.
Count042
joined 4 years ago
Biden tried and failed to secure cooperation from Sisi to ethnically cleanse them to the Sinai desert and failed.
The administrations are obviously different. This is not an example of that.
VOA is explicitly American propaganda. That is literally its public purpose and goal.
His domestic opposition is more vocally pro-war then he is, so no, this wouldn't end it.
It already has?
Every nation in this world would consider this to be material support of an enemy.
I mean shit, we were debanking people named Isis.
Just to be clear, that was literally both campaigns.
Like, the two campaigns were obviously very different. You just picked one of the areas where the DNC decided to try to out Republican the Republicans.
How is it worse? This was literally Bidens public plan. His administration was just quieter about it, though not silent, which is how we know if was their plan.
So what should be done to the country that blew up Germany's oil pipes?
And you sound like a racist.
The person you were responding to correctly pointed out the destruction of the Nordstream was done by ...well, not Russia. And the destruction of that underwater pipe ( very much like an underwater cable) was used as a propaganda point by trying to blame Russia for its destruction.
Not a hard analogy to understand.
Huh, racist and poor reading comprehension. I guess it should be obvious those two would go together.
It was either the US or Ukraine, depending on if you believe Seymour Hersh.
That single act destroyed the economy of Germany and is probably the single act most responsible for AfD doing so well now.
It would also have been the first act of war by a NATO member against another NATO member, if you believe Seymour Hersh.
It was far far more destructive then cutting an internet line, and yet everyone here seems to forgotten it because it is a problematic thing to be concerned by for thee people that want war with a nuclear power.
They're attempting to justify the unjustifiable.
They're polite and calm about it, you're correct. But those words pertain to how information is transmitted, not something that can be used to consider the morality of the information contained therein.
Do not confuse a kind way of saying horrible things as making the horrible things not horrible.