Yes, 'sausage' is definitely used more for the description of a shape than for what out contains. It would make more sense for 'burger' to be used to describe the shape too, i.e. a synonym for the word 'patty', which makes it sound too close to 'pat', as in 'what cows leave in fields'.
The Dictionary Gatekeepers should also add the word 'sausagenous' to mean sausage-shaped, mostly because it's pleasing to say.
The claim is that people can be confused about what the product is if the meat and non-meat products are called by such universally descriptive names. I find this argument specious as all the non-meat stuff I see has some variation of ”meat-free" on the packaging in large and distinct text, so what they're suggesting is that meat-eaters are illiterate. Not sure that's the huge gotcha the lobbyists think it is, TBH.
Yes, 'sausage' is definitely used more for the description of a shape than for what out contains. It would make more sense for 'burger' to be used to describe the shape too, i.e. a synonym for the word 'patty', which makes it sound too close to 'pat', as in 'what cows leave in fields'.
The Dictionary Gatekeepers should also add the word 'sausagenous' to mean sausage-shaped, mostly because it's pleasing to say.
The claim is that people can be confused about what the product is if the meat and non-meat products are called by such universally descriptive names. I find this argument specious as all the non-meat stuff I see has some variation of ”meat-free" on the packaging in large and distinct text, so what they're suggesting is that meat-eaters are illiterate. Not sure that's the huge gotcha the lobbyists think it is, TBH.