EmilyIsTrans

In my experience, Wikipedia has a pervasive cultural of false balance, and it does not surprise me at all that this attitude extends to the founder of the site. Despite their many policies dictating otherwise, in my experience adjudicators often end up weighing authoritative academic sources equally with outdated or lower quality references. Looking through the talk page, it sounds like there was already an extensive RFC for the wording of the lede. Policy was already applied correctly in this case - the system worked as it was supposed to - and it's incredibly inappropriate for Wales to pull rank, reopen discussion when there has been no notable change in circumstance, and advocate for this exact kind of behaviour.

Considering you can turn off telemetry and never need to connect it to the internet after activation, I'm assuming that - like how Adobe uses cheap education licenses to on-ramp people onto their platform - this is largely intended to drive professionals towards Canva and their various other products. They take a loss on this product to become the de-facto standard image/vector/publishing application.

Still no Linux support. As someone who purchased the Affinity Suite, I'm not sure I like this shift in model. If they keep to just fencing off AI in premium and keep investing in the whole app, fine, but I don't have my hopes up.

It's still makeup

Why not just pull the data from their ftp or something downstream like openmeteo?

I personally like it. I wish it were a little more compact, but it seems to be nearly feature parable with the old one and looks a little more up to date. This seems to be a step up in accessibility, both in terms of screen reader compatibility and behaving more in line with what an average user would expect. They've apparently even gone the extra mile to ensure existing bookmarks keep working.

Having been behind a couple of these modernization efforts, no one ever likes them. People complain every time but the user testing doesn't lie. Unfortunately redesigns are necessary as technology and user expectations change and considering the fact that the old website didn't play well on mobile and was well over 10 years old (15 if you're counting from the last major redesign) I'd say this one was pretty due. The fact this redesign even kept nearly every feature and option (as far as I can tell), rolled out fairly smoothly, and hasn't gone too overboard with minimalism/lack of character, I'm willing to call the redesign good.

Yeah, someone has looked at the spreadsheet and realised that basically no one uses the desktop app I'll bet

I'm personally of the belief that you are largely the sum of your experiences, so yeah a total loss of memories would mean I am by some definition "dead". That said, you could easily argue by that same logic that the "me" of a year, month, or even minute ago is also "dead", since she lacks the experiences that makes me who I am now. I don't even dispute that that much tbh.

??? I am Australian ???

The world does not revolve around the US and the Epstein files

This is awful. One of my favorite differences between Android and iOS, as both a user AND developer is sideloading.

I mean yeah, but people also regularly steal things despite it being against the rules. Like those, wiki rules are enforced (theoretically) as a best effort.