FiskFisk33

joined 3 years ago
[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 20 points 14 hours ago

They use QMK, which really is keyboard firmware with added on mouse functionality

[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 17 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I dunno, the original Lotus esprit is still pretty cool in my book

[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 24 points 6 days ago (1 children)

This is not oniony, this is just yet another "Elon musk says"

[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 3 points 1 week ago

they're not wrong

[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 32 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (15 children)

I disagree. Leaving someone with trauma, versus leaving someone in a life or death situation is quite different I'd say.

[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 10 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 4 points 1 month ago

It's technically infinite, but the set of numbers we can express (in a reasonable timeframe), while large, is finite.

[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 2 points 1 month ago

if you get hit by a wall with infinite weight, moving at 1km/h, it has infinite energy, yet it will merely push you away

[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 8 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

i do have to point out, the plane trip itself was far worse, climate wise, than the vibe writing.

That said, yes I agree, it is of course an extra load, that could be easily avoided.

[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

You have it backwards. Larger vehicles of course have more energy, but pedestrians are too light for that to make a difference.

If you get hit by an oil tanker ship going ~1 kmh, that ship has orders of magnitude more kinetic energy than a car at highway speed, yet, unless theres a wall or something, the ship will merely push you harmlessly aside.

Its about the manner of delivery, not the vehicles energy.

Larger cars are more dangerous because they hit you higher up, where you have more vital organs.

view more: next ›