FreedomAdvocate

joined 8 months ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] FreedomAdvocate -4 points 4 months ago (7 children)

I feel like one huge thing that’s been missed in here in all this outrage is that it wasn’t just “porn games” that were removed from sale - they were, from what I saw, extreme and sick ones like “rape simulators”, “incest simulators”, and pedophile sex games, where you seduce and rape young children……..

As someone against censorship in all forms I disagree with what they’ve done, but as a rational person….. if there was ever something that should be censored (or made illegal more like it), it’s probably this.

[–] FreedomAdvocate -2 points 4 months ago

There’s about to be a huge chunk of generations that won’t watch porn or masturbate because they have no sexual function whatsoever thanks to being chemically castrated voluntarily.

Maybe that was the play all along? Remove the audience so porn disappears.

[–] FreedomAdvocate 0 points 4 months ago

Did the democrats release the Epstein list and put everyone on it in jail while they were in power for 4 years after he died?

Why not?

[–] FreedomAdvocate -3 points 4 months ago (4 children)

Which section is that, the one that wants to take away women’s rights by letting males into their spaces, and who constantly award women of the year awards and women’s representative spots to males?

[–] FreedomAdvocate -3 points 4 months ago (17 children)
[–] FreedomAdvocate 2 points 4 months ago

What a ridiculous “study”. They basically just go “oh a relatively young person died of heart disease? Yeah that’s from cars polluting the air, count them”

These pollutants cause inflammation, contribute to heart and lung disease, and are linked to other health problems such as diabetes and asthma.

Would love to know who commissioned and paid for the “study”.

[–] FreedomAdvocate 4 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Well this is certainly a question I never thought I’d read on the internet.

The school systems need an overhaul.

[–] FreedomAdvocate -2 points 4 months ago

Raiding a former presidents house with orders to shoot to kill? Just fine, no problem

Raiding some former security advisors house? Absurd! Constitutional crisis!

Unbelievable.

[–] FreedomAdvocate 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Just no empathy for women, only for men.

view more: ‹ prev next ›