The sunk cost fallacy is when you keep sinking more money into something because of how much you have already sunk into it. It doesn’t apply when you simply make a one-off purchase and then don’t ever spend another cent.
The irony is delicious.
It absolutely is, and any subsidies for the fossil fuel industry should be stopped. Not the answer you thought you would get, is it?
It does nothing of the sort. All it does is say what is happening on a betting site.
The betting site bets on all sorts of non-American things, that doesn’t mean it’s not only for American residents.
A $250 tax cut isn’t worth the paper it’s written on.
Why would you bother “maintaining” jellyfin when you don’t use it? Just install it if you ever move away from Plex. Seems like work for nothing.
Plex just works, especially for library sharing and remote watching - something that does not work without insecure and/or messy workarounds on jellyfin.
Most devices that people watch tv and movies on in people’s houses don’t have a way to connect to Tailscale.
You thinking it’s an “obvious fallacy” is what should be irking you, cause you’re wrong lol
No, it’s not the sunk cost fallacy lol
It would have to be paid, the exact thing that jellyfin evangelists despise……while half of them happily subscribe and pay $ for a VPS just so they don’t have to subscribe to Plex while having a much worse experience 🤣
JellyFin users seem to be like Linux users.
🤣