FreedomAdvocate

joined 1 year ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] FreedomAdvocate -3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

Just go sign up for any of the activist organisations that advertise it:

https://torontosun.com/opinion/columnists/kinsella-protesters-paid-to-take-part-in-pro-palestinian-demonstrations

Did you really think that the protests that are 90% pensioners holding all the same print signs and chanting the same thing, often reading from their printouts they were given, were organic?

https://crowdsondemand.com/blog/fill-the-house-proven-strategies-for-getting-a-packed-crowd-at-your-next-event-6jn7p

[–] FreedomAdvocate -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

Would be incredibly easy to make secure, as it wouldn’t even need to store the verification documents or anything personally identifiable once your account is set up.

I think if the government is actually serious about doing this they will need to do it, or outsource it to someone who will. I don’t actually think these laws will take effect in December.

This could even be done incredibly easily via myGov for example. It has everyone’s information including DOB. I could build an age verification API for that in a night with time for a good snooze.

Do you agree that it is possible without all of the porn sites getting your information now at least?

[–] FreedomAdvocate -5 points 1 year ago

I’d love to hear from the 3 downvotes on why they downvoted me here lol. Do they think that pornhub does have age verification and restricts those who haven’t verified their age?

[–] FreedomAdvocate -5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

YouTube absolutely has age restricted content, what are you talking about?

https://support.google.com/youtube/answer/2802167?hl=en

Age-restricted content

Sometimes content doesn't violate our Community Guidelines, but it may be incompatible with YouTube's Terms of Service or not appropriate for viewers under 18. In these cases, we may place an age-restriction on the video. This policy applies to videos, video descriptions, custom thumbnails, live streams, and any other YouTube product or feature.

Did you really not know this was a thing? I can’t even listen to half of the music I like on YouTube without being signed in because of age restrictions lol.

You think I’m authoritarian? You could not be more incorrect if you tried lol. I think parents should be more responsible for the content their kids consume and what they do - but I also believe that age restrictions on content should exist to prevent access when even the best of parents can’t be there to stop it. I’m one of the few people on Lemmy who actually argues FOR free speech and less censorship lol

[–] FreedomAdvocate -5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There’s no point. Someone that posts what you did isn’t going to listen and admit they were wrong, so I’m not being drawn into a shouting match :)

[–] FreedomAdvocate -4 points 1 year ago

The difference isn’t significant in this situation. You’re acting like HDDs are floppy disks lol. Their random IO is not “pretty terrible”.

[–] FreedomAdvocate -2 points 1 year ago (6 children)

By verifying with a central age verification system.

What has been thrown around, and what should hopefully be the solution, is that a government agency (as a last resort) or a independent trusted authority makes a system where you create an account and verify your age with your documents with them. Then they have public APIs for sites to hit - you give the site a unique key (preferably you would generate individual keys that are tied to your account for every site) and all that site does is hit that API going “Is the person that this key belongs to 18+?”, and the response is yes or no.

Simple, secure, private. The site you’re accessing doesn’t know who you are and doesn’t get your details. The age verification site also doesn’t necessarily know the site you were using, and this should not be logged either.

[–] FreedomAdvocate -5 points 1 year ago (8 children)

It doesn’t exist, but that is what some are suggesting and hoping is going to be made with these laws being passed. It would be a really good thing for the internet and websites/apps as a whole tbh if a system like this is made, and it’s not like it would be difficult.

The sites wouldnt need your information, they would just verify that the person attempting to access the site is authenticated as being 18+.

[–] FreedomAdvocate -2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Did you just add punctuation incorrectly in an attempt to prove your intelligence/downplay mine?

You do understand that the sentence you just wrote is grammatically incorrect, don’t you?

view more: ‹ prev next ›